London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Are short on this . What is the likelihood that Ocean is working for them. Pretty high I would say...
Pfft, get a grip, you mean to say a 3 week old LSE account with 111 out of 118 posts being negative on TED has an agenda for someone with a short?? Surely not? Ocean literally sticks out like a sore thumb it's comical
"Pfft, get a grip, you mean to say a 3 week old LSE account with 111 out of 118 posts being negative on TED has an agenda for someone with a short?? Surely not? Ocean literally sticks out like a sore thumb it's comical"
Indeed. And there's never been any substance to the arguments put forward.
Blue day it seems. Would be nice to get back above 80p.
on the move now. 78.80p paid.
shorters at this level are taking a big risk near-term imo.
"shorters at this level are taking a big risk near-term imo."
Agree.
This is priced to fail, but the recent update suggests it has a good chance of survival.
Even the Times has turned positive:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ted-baker-embraces-online-sales-surge-xthjn6tbr
100% agree. Ocean has an agenda and its clear as day. Whoever pays him should sack the idiot for giving the game away so easily :-)
What an utter load of b0llock$ about 'proving' something will not go into admin. These chat forum paid shorters with an agenda said the same about Cineworld when it hit 20. Hold tight to your TED shares, you'll be glad you did in a few months. Huge gap up to come. GLA.
None of you can say this won't go into administration. TED is priced to fail. hilarious comments here.
No we can't say it definitely won't go into administration, nor can you say it definitely will. If it's priced to fail that's good, as it means if it doesn't there significant upside in the sp from here. Moron
"None of you can say this won't go into administration."
There you go, I said it.
The comment adds about as much to the conversation as your suggestion that ted will go into admin. Truth is admin is possible for any company. Time will tell here, but right now the numbers are pointing in the opposite direction.
What I can say is the is a high debt loss making company with no prospect in sight for future groy. It's was in trouble well before Covid. That's a very strong basis consideration administration. And it's priced accordingly. No view opposes this.
It's really very easy to foresee a company won't go into administration in general. But in the case of ted it easier to see that it will. Good brand but they are I'm trouble with their finances. For the benefit of all I don't have any association with square point capital.
You're not really adding anything new to the conversation. We know the company is in a precarious position and my opinion is the price reflects that. The update was broadly positive in my opinion, suggesting green shoots of recovery were visible. Again, this was reflected by the jump in share price - gains which the market has mostly held onto.
Time will tell who is right. However, it's more than a little odd that you spend so much time on a company you have no interest in being part of.
" No view opposes this"
during a boom no one ever thinks a bust will ruin the party ...and during a bust people lose faith that the good times can ever return ...
it is raining and you have no hope of the sun coming back...fair enough...well move along then ...
you are beginning to sound like a broken record
this isn't going into admin - much more likely it'll get bought by someone like boo
A competitor would only buy it out of administration. It's in far too weak a shape.
77p to buy. expect a bounce from here. well lets see.
not much volume. easy for a short seller to take this down on small AT trades isn't that right ocean?
78.20p to buy. missed your chance to join the longs ocean. 77p to buy was a good op.
BIG push now ted. gives a blue finish.
To me I think of Casual Dining Group - a big business with fantastic brands like Cafe Rouge & Bella Italia - shopped by millions of customers. Now into administration. They have a good brand but we're in a bad financial spot and the market moved against them. Competitors are queuing up to buy a stake in those brands as they remain valuable. To me this is how I see Ted collapsing.
FTSE 250 flat today. finish blue would be a good result.
go on my son! 78.34p paid.
oceanpassage - explain how it's in too weak a position to get bought out? genuine request - I'm interested.
Do you work in finance? intrigued about your insight here - be good to hear.
look at all those AT buys. 78.75p paid. told you 77p was a good buy.