Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
You don't half talk some sh*t.
"Dont know what ur seeing and deliberately misrepresenting the business case is just silly."
I've not represented any business case let alone misrepresented one. What's properly silly is saying inventing things then arguing against them.
"When I look at your graph I see over the last 12 months a zig zag pattern."
Let's ignore your language appears to be technical analysis for 5 years, you do love to focus on a very narrow time-frame, and then argue long-term holders suffer, despite the long term trend being clearly up, as in the chart I've posted repeatedly. The reason you're ignoring that is you're clearly wrong and have no comeback.
"Shanta currently isn't worth investing in unless you want small percentage gains trading on the trending zig zag and a truly epically disappointing dividend. Fact."
Just because you say Fact at the end of a sentence it doesn't make it true. It's the same demonstrably wrong nonsense repeated in a different way.
"RMM is a clear cut winner on the turnaround. 2022 will be epic. Fact."
That's clearly not a fact. The FACTS are that RMM has thusfar totally destroyed shareholders and is a clear loser. Whether the leopard can ever change its spots remains to be seen.
You basically don't have any coherent point whatsoever. It's like arguing with a child.
Last reply to you on here as it's very tedious.
If you want any further discussion, I'll start a new thread on the RMM board, if you want to continue with this nonsense, where I'll be happy to highlight the value destruction to everyone there.
But we agree on Bitcoin at least :p
Yet again everything you just posted is factually wrong.
I keep posting the graph of the SHG share price, which directly contradicts your nonsense, and you keep trying to claim black is white, with nonsense about a long downtrend.
Either you're deliberately misrepresenting things or your "research" is abysmal.
You talk about "jam tomorrow" here, despite the share price having trended upwards for years, and following on from a paragraph where you write a load of nonsense about: "projected profits from which could drive the company into the stratosphere next year and it looks to be coming together. Multibag. low risk, high reward". Which is, wonderfully ironically, a perfect example of jam tomorrow, on a share that has never delivered anything but shareholder value destruction.
Basically, if you did a tiny bit of research, you'd see that you're just gambling on buying a terrible company hoping it'll turn around.
If you think RMM is a better investment that says it all - it's a basket case.
Monkeydluffy - yes, biased towards facts and evidence, hence the graph I posted, rather than spurious buy ranges, that appear to be focusing on an irrelevantly short portion of the trading history.
You should focus your research on what you're putting all your money into! Which appears to be RMM, and has pretty much the worst possible share price graph trajectory you could imagine.
I suppose this should be no surprise though, the CEO there used to be the CEO at Shanta, before he was replaced by Eric Zurrin, as the company "decided to refocus its strategy on cost control and shareholder returns." Funnily enough the share price has risen ever since he left and the RMM share price under his leadership has been decimated.
And you call this a value trap....lol....this is the RMM graph for the past few years (it's even worse if you look back further): https://www.tradingview.com/x/07A3NoQE/
If being even more generous, here's just the past year under the new CEO:
https://www.tradingview.com/x/Q33CCPT3/
Truly epic shareholder value destruction.
So personally, I prefer the look of the supposed "value trap" of Shanta I think: https://www.tradingview.com/x/pJRy9lKr/
Am fully invested here now but did sell 25% at near 17p and bought back this week around 15.5p. Could go lower but happy to hold at these prices.
Personally I think that's all a load of b*llocks ;)
"trading share" is one of the most stupid phrases I hear periodically on social media.
Every share is a "trading share" unless you're never going to sell (in which case what's the point)!
If you take a slightly longer term view the "zig zag" looks quite good ;)
https://www.tradingview.com/x/pJRy9lKr/
??? that's your perception because you are a trader: amazing how psychologically dim some posters are. Let the investors invest.