Proposed Directors of Tirupati Graphite explain why they have requisitioned an GM. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
You just order them pending approval which is probably why BBI tweeted.
No approval, no pay for the ‘order’.
I don't know better, I do know that the government can't be seen to send kits to homes that do not have approval from it's own body that is set up to do approval ! It doesn't take inside knowledge to recognise the absolute PR nightmare that could result in.
I still think it's an entirely point as we've been told MHRA is simply a document review (i.e. tickbox) exercise.
"or...... shall I consider the anonymous BB poster who knows better.... hmmm"
Interesting... aren't you an anonymous BB poster who is proporting that he knows better as he has information from the company.
Discuss
"Colin King, CEO of Omega, commented: “We’re very pleased that the self-test usability study has completed and that
we are progressing towards our goal of MHRA approval for self-test home use. We cannot give a timescale for when
this might be achieved but we look forward to updating shareholders on further developments.”
(From the RNS on 7 September)
Self-test use requires MHRA approval. Professional POC use doesn't (as the test is CE marked and registered). The thing to remembers is that the Government is likely to order both types of tests for different parts of the five pillars.
It is highly unlikely that the Government would order self-use tests without MHRA approval, as that would open them to potential liabilities (there is no blanket liability waiver under the current coronavirus regulations). They've already ****ed up with some of the current tests and are facing legal action - they can't afford to **** up again.
Indemnity* insurers for healthcare providers - both NHS and IS - require use of approved tests. These can either be those that are CE marked and registered (i.e. the UK-RTC professional POC AbC19 test) or self-use tests that have been subject to MHRA approval (which will be the UK-RTC AbC19 self-use test).
But the key take away from this all is: sit back and stop worrying. All will fall into place in due course and we have an exciting few months ahead of us.
* please note that in relation to NHS activity, either from NHS or IS providers, the indemnity being referred to is public and employer liability, as clinical negligence** indemnity for NHS activity is covered by the NHS Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts. In relation to private clinical activity, either by NHS or IS providers, the indemnity will also relate to clinical negligence as this cover has to be privately procured.
** as healthcare providers are required to have Covid-safe processes, arguably issues arising from the use of non-approved tests could be argued to be clinical negligence.
*