Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Lets hope they see a share price of 10 at the end of the year which must be doable when the App lands , just a wild guess :) which takes their investment to 20 million approx and in line with their RNS intent statement , so that 7% does not stack up in my opinion .
Of course, they're all in it for profit.
But it's not a zero-sum game. Find a business model that properly rewards artists, you find a business model that is sustainable and will also properly profit the companies who make the music available to consumers.
As you say, the question is whether they're after a long-term or short-term profit. The shortest-term profit is a quick 7% flip. Without warrants, and with what we know of N+G, that seems unlikely as I argued in my OP. If they're in it for a profit, they still achieve that by investing at these lows and riding the share price up. Whether they sell mid-term (few months) or longer term - well, that's just like any other large institutional holder. There's an overhang created by the fact they have to sell some day.
We have a market cap of circa £50-60m. We have £40m in funding for the app, plus the money to pay for the RTO. There is a reason Davis Group have the charges on their loans. It is actually quite incredible for a company with such a low Mcap to have been able to secure the funding they have to date! So I can stomach a bit of dilution and a low sp for now, but my expectations on the new app and launch plans are very high
EVRH/Melodyvr/Napster have now invested 70 million into this business model over the last 4 years , you would take a punt that the commercial investors are in on this long term investment !!!!! And i would like to believe the intent written by all the partners on the RNS and thats most wanting to build a fairer business for the industry , of course they all could be greedy, only in for profit but if that is the case they will be looking at the later/bigger picture which is long term and not in a couple of months ?
Rikki - I believe they knew exactly what they were doing. As I say, for short-term finance, this is an excellent setup. So tailored for what we need, they may well have planned all this during that suspension period.
As for N+G waiting until the end of June to convert: We don't know their plans. They have the full 12 months of the facility to convert, and can do it whenever they wish. I do know that they don't get to ring the London Stock Exchange and ask for the share price to be 2p on a certain date so that they can come in at 1.86p. Share prices are driven by supply and demand, and by lots of other factors. They will judge their entry points. Like the rest of us, they can wait hoping for a lower entry, knowing they may miss the entry as the price roars higher or the company repays the loan. Or they can convert now, knowing they may miss a lower entry later. At only 7% discount, with no indication their conversion leads to selling, I'm not too worried when they do it.
And that deep turn around will be as per the presentation , once Napster cover its costs its just a case of sharing our libraries ( NOS 5G already promoting Melody) , and the old library that is being promoted will look relevant . ok we will have to pay our fair share to the artists etc but no other costs , brilliant business model imo , Great post slowlyslowly you have captured all us LTH , good luck .
I’ve made a very similar point recently SlowlySlowly - very easy for some to jump on the decision with the negatives, but these types show lack of business experience and awareness. I hope the additional funds are to push the new app through quicker, perhaps in response to the ever-changing COVID news re live concerts. OR, maybe there are big big plans in waiting requiring the new app to be released sooner? This is not easy for those who haven’t taken profit and/or averaged down and I get the bitterness. It’s tough atm. It’s a waiting game and those who see the bigger picture will prosper. GLA
2. The effect of the CLN terms on Napster
Napster needed short-term finance to get a new app released, to integrate the two former businesses, and to integrate the Melody and Napster branded services into one offering. What were their options for such finance?
(i) Place new shares. Typically, the brokerage house would charge about 5% arrangement fee, so they'd get £7.6m by placing £8m worth of shares. AIM placings can come at a deep discount. 10% is not uncommon. The result: Existing holders get heavily diluted.
(ii) Loan. They already have loan facilities in place, but taking out additional loans would probably be at a substantial rate of interest. It also formally increases the debt / asset ratio of the company.
(iii) The CLN plan we have.
The plan we have is not unlike (i) - new shares are issued at a discount to the current price to finance the company. However the discount is only 7%, which is much better than it could have been. The new shares go not to private investors who flip their shares for a quick profit, only to keep their warrants that create a further overhang to be sold into. Rather, they go to an institutional investor who's indicated they're a long-term supporter of the business. So it's like the very best of placings - sticky hands, low discount. What's more, if the company's cashflow increases to the point where they can repay the loan sooner, they have the option to do that, so the number of shares issued at 7% dilution is only as large as they actually need it to be, rather than placing new shares now for the full amount they may need.
The plan we have is also not unlike (ii) - tranches of a loan are made, under the initial terms at no more than 3 weekly intervals. Only there's the option for the holder to convert that loan to stock at favourable terms, so the size of the company's loan facility need not stay large.
All in all - they needed short-term finance to get them from the loss-making MVR days to the sunnier days ahead offering an integrated MVR-NAPS offering to a growing range of telcos etc - the largest online music library, coupled with immersive VR bringing live music into people's homes. Given they needed that, it seems to me they've found the ideal partner and the ideal way to fund it.
The fact that, technically, this is via a financial instrument known as a "convertible loan note" should not mean we conclude we're now in a death spiral. Not all CLNs are created equal. This package, is in fact, ideally suited for Napster at this point in its deep turn-around.
OK, provocative title.
CLNs are often nicknamed "death spiral" finance. That's because the mantra "they can only sell once" no longer applies when there are CLNs issued. If "the seller" is someone converting a loan into stock to sell, as long as they have more loan, they can get more stock to sell, so any rise gets sold into.
But not all CLNs are equal. Let's look at this package. It's a one-year loan facility, to be issued in tranches (now) between now and the end of June. Nice and Green can, at any time, convert that loan into shares at 7% discount. Or they can hold and it gets repaid at maturity. Unless the company repays first at 3% premium (thus searing potential for future conversions, saving 4%). There's no interest on the loan. Arrangement fee: 5%.
1. Nice and Green's intentions.
Why did they enter this deal? 3 options.
(i) To convert the loan to stock, to sell, to make a quick 7%.
(ii) To hold the loan as cash, to maturity, to profit from the arrangement fee.
(iii) To convert the loan to stock, to hold, as a way to invest in the business.
I believe it's (iii) because of two things.
(a) Look at their website and the way they operate. They research and hand-pick which businesses to invest in carefully. They've mostly invested in pharmas, with a few tech and other sectors. There are other CLN lending firms in the City that are a lender of last resort. No need to name names, but when they rock up you know it's bad news. Lending to businesses who can't get credit is just an easy way to make a few quid. That's not the flavour of N+G, from their publicly available material. You don't need to choose businesses with care if you're going to lend for a quick flip. All you need is a liquid market. So it seems they're not here for (i).
(b) The RNS on 14th April said this: "We are a long-term supporter of the business whose interests are fully aligned to the shareholder community and are genuinely excited about the growth opportunity which Napster affords us". That's not a legal undertaking that they'll convert and hold, but we'd not expect that. It's the closest they can come in a quotation at the bottom of an RNS. It clearly states their intentions.