We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
What if you were a multinational company with a possible impending infringement on a companies IP? I personally would buy quietly without causing a ramp in price, that would assist with off setting some legal costs. And some recooperation and so this maybe via a Suisse broker that invests on behalf of individuals without creating a TR1. Just an opinion.
I have just visited the Nanoco trading record on the OTC website. I agree with Screenlearner's earlier comment. Moreover, both the volume of trades and the trading frequency would be unlikely to influence the Nanoco share price. The $0.27 trade is a tiny spurious trade, and does not suggest that there is a share price hike afoot.
Similarly, the closing 11p trade on the AIM market earlier was a'bot' trade of 3 shares.
Two false dawns as far as I am concerned. It would be good to receive specific positive verifiable information to move the share price to a sustainable higher valuation. For the time being we can only trust in the recent promising statements put forward by the Nanoco board.
Screenlearner's earlier comment about how this investment could go either way made me think of Isaac Newton. He noted in 1721, after losing most of his fortune in the collapse of the South Sea bubble: " I can calculate the motions of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people".
Someone (Oracle of Omaha?) just bought 200 shares at $0.17 per share. This price is not too out of line.
I suspect it was Warren Buffet.
Sorry I obviously mean "doesn't"
Volume =2,720 price =$0.27 means Value=$ 734.4. Does sound like the sort of value someone who had real information would bother with.
OTC is up 200%.
Price now $0.27
Volume traded was 2,720.
Usual volume 650 ish.
It is a mugs game anyway. Any Future Development type Company.
Nano however is a company that is going to bounce......
Amerlogue, do you know how many shares were traded at $0.27?
Someone just bought Nanoco shares on the US OTC market for $0.27 (way above the LSE price) when the previous trade had been $0.09 (well below the LSE price). Hopefully, they know something, but I doubt that they have any inside knowledge. This is probably another instance of someone submitting a Market order in a very illiquid market.
Bot Bot
I'm not sure just considering the number of patents to calculate a possible price is anything to do with logic or the right way to calculate value. I could as well say Samsung gained £several billions from our technology and that should be ours (*3 for wilfull infringement of our patent) plus the prospect of a big purchase order from, who knows, ST micro possibly, means the company is worth at least £3-5 billion . Alternatively the purchase order may not materialize or be very small and we may get a very rubust defence from Samsung in the next few days (quite likely) and the company share price might actual drop significantly. I don't claim to know which way it will turn out but trying to predict the company's share price in the near future is a mug's game. We MAY have a clearer picturenext week.
The logic says.
QD = $70m.
Nano (3xtimes as many IP's) = $210m + retro-licensing "fine" of Samsung (under the table deal) of $290m = $500m.
$500m = $2.10 or £1.74 ish.......
Assuming logic.!
There is very little trading activity this week, and the share price remains within the trading range that has remained for a number of weeks. It could be that most investors who perceive value in Nanoco shares at the current price are, by now, fully invested.
I saw a similar pattern with City Fibre Infrastructure over two years ago. The share price was close to the year- low price, having been 60%+ higher five months previously. There was very little trading up to the time that the company was bought and the share price doubled overnight.
Should something similar occur with Nanoco, I am anticipating substantially more than a 100% increase in the share price. I would most probably (having, unfortunately, turned down 30p in February) sell for 50p-60p per share. Although others, who are far better informed than myself anticipate a higher price, I suspect that getting more than this out of Samsung, or other interested parties, would be akin to extracting blood from the proverbial stone.
RG wanted in and has not sold out (at least not yet). So, like the rest of us he is probably waiting for news of the Purchase Orders (and Samsung’s response) and holds the same frustrations that many of us do.
He may not have timed his investment to perfection but that suggests he did not had access to Any privileged information, and I am comforted that II seem to remain long. I hope it is just a matter of time until better news flows.
Your guess would be as good as anyone.
Is RG the same RG described as a former sheep farmer in the Welsh hills, who has since enjoyed a very successful investment career resulting in a net personal worth of around £200m?
This being the case, he is probably expecting to realise a profit on his Nanoco investment, and is patiently awaiting the outcome of the current developments that are still in progress.
There is still a week before Samsung’s response to the patent infringement action. Will there be an escalation in the share price in anticipation of an eventual positive outcome?
So RG is looming on the edge following his sales in other areas.
Going to be a very interesting week.
Price still held down, but buzzards are now around.
Luckily my 1,750,000 share holding is in my bag already, otherwise when the price increases from today, it would be a more costly adventure...
I hope everyone is ready and fully bagged.
No point in waiting for it to go up and then buy-in, that's a mugs game of buying on the up.