The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Candy already has accepted the 7% rate and MTL have already paid off the loan as far as they are concerned, Edwards is basically being given his 7% and if he wants 15% he will have to fight for it, but it looks like a lost cause for him with MTL having written legal agreements and Candy has followed those agreements and already accepted taking 7% interest.
Cracking day all in all, bring on Q2 and news on the Abra tenement.
Strange that the two parties to the loan agreement would have different interpretations of it. Did I read some months ago that Candy's reduction of the loan interest rate was dependent on RHL doing the same? No mention of that in the recent RNS but it's hard to imagine the two factions accepting different rates.
Good luck derampimg $44 mill revenue.and $24 mill cash inflow for the qtr
From the 27th March RNS - "RHL Group advisers have communicated RHL Group's belief that the higher 15% rate is applicable until repayment, which potentially amounts to an additional US$1.9m owed in interest payments to date."
This we already knew.
The most worrying part of today's RNS is the following :-" During Q1 2024 most aspects of the process plant performed adequately"
Adequately!! Why aren't the derampers jumping on this sentence?
/s
Https://metalsexploration.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/MTL-Repayment-of-Debt.pdf
"RHL Group advisers have communicated RHL Group’s belief that the higher 15% rate is applicable until repayment,
which potentially amounts to an additional US$1.9m owed in interest payments to date. The Company disputes this
figure and believes it has relevant documentation to support its position. Discussions on this matter with the RHL
Group continue and further announcements will be made in due course, as required"
It is just the smaller shareholders Edwards part of the loan interest thats in dispute, the larger shareholder Nick Candy has accepted the terms and the interest reduction to 7%, so yes its not alot, but its a written agreement that Edwards and Candy made with MTL and Candy is sticking to it, so Edwards is going to lose the argument if he was to take it any further than verbally agreeing to what he signed for, overall its small fry now, and not worth thinking about.
Isnt the extra interest 8.5% of 30% of 21 mill, so only 535,000
All very positive. Only snag is the increased interest rate debate on the 30% still has us on the hook for near enough 2 million USD. Would be good to resolve this ASAP, and hopefully plow full steam ahead into purchasing as much land as possible for future mining.
I want this share to delivery well into my pensionable years!
Hi Darientaylor, on the Q1 numbers for both companies, checking the current market caps for both companies:
CEY making 105k ounces with a average AISC of $1275 and a market cap of £1470 million.
MTL making 23k ounces with a average AISC of $1150 with a market cap of £117 million
We produce about 1/4 of the profits CEY produce but are market capped at just 1/12 th
So MTLs market cap needs to increase 3 fold to equal CEYs market valuation.
It blows my mind how cheap MTL is, but I couldnt be happier knowing the cream will always float to the top, just enjoy the ride.
Correction year Market Cap £250 mill share price 12p
Year end numbers out in about 3 weeks.looking for
revenue of $146 mill
Operating profit $62 mill
profit before tax $58 mill
Pretax P/E 3..
bargain of the year
share T/P 250p by year end
having noticed the rns and did some back of a *** packet numbers.
so produced 23k oz gold at an aisc of about $1,100 per oz , this is about one qtr the production of cey who produced 105k oz at an aisc of $1500. market cap of cey is over £1 billion, mtl is £117k if mtl continues on this level of production they it look under valued by about 50%... maybe thats too simplistic but there is substantial headroom to the upside. imho
We held onto 1540 ounces of gold produced but didn’t sell, that would have made another $3.1 million free cash flow to those results, if they had done that they could have made nearly $25 million in just 1 quarter, from a gold price more than $250 dollars lower than todays.
On that basis going forward 2024 is set to exceed $100 million profit, the numbers are amazing, and from 1 mine, Darren Bowden (Mr understatement) already has the second mine in hand and has expressed in recent interviews he wants multiple mines, multiple incomes and a £2 billion market cap, who knows what’s achievable from a man who consistently under promises and over delivers.