Firering Strategic Minerals: From explorer to producer. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Well... If we close ABOVE 0.0374p then a bear-trap-reversal is confirmed. So hopefully up from here. It's been long!
GLA
But fundamentals show this is a complete bull trap of a company. Someone below can also see the board has more raises in them yet if they can get away with it. Cash currently going down as not in profit yet. ME spoke of the hope of cash positivity in previous ventures which didn't work out. They need to update with more detail on these numbers if statements like that are going to be thrown out.
What do they need to raise again for System ?
They can't go empty. Cash is going down currently which you can't refute as they are currently not cash positive.. They have an expectation or rather HOPE that they may be positive at the end of the year. The party line will be there are no current plans to raise, which can change at the drop of a hat. Running back to Peterhouse was a bit of a joke don't you think? Embarrassing really.
Well I suppose we’ll have to wait and see but we know they have drastically cut overheads and with them already billing Estadio I think you might be pleasantly surprised, I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t have come out and said they will be breakeven this calendar year if they weren’t confident ?
Perhaps Peterhouse came running to them cap in hand - who knows ? 🤷♂️
Peterhouse came to MOS cap in hand. How silly of you. MOS likely went crying to them and they are only happy to get ready fees and offer insulting discounts.
Hmmmmm System 🤔 really ?
AimInvestor1900: see post on 24 Apr 2024 18:08
"I wont be bothering with your other comments in my reply based on you being a brand new LSE account set up to post negative comments on MOS. Strange..."
Techno that is probably because you are a multi poster who went down the neutral to suddenly positive angle. Nice try.
Any persons has a right to post on this forum Mr Tr1. You are the same TR1 who admitted pretending to being an American investor to pump the share price. Why would anyone listen to you ?
AimInvestor1900: "multi poster". Totally untrue. You can look back at what I have posted since I joined LSE (a little under 6 months ago).
On the other hand pretty sure that you have been posting on LSE before or is this your first time on this website?
I won't be engaging with your silly posts from here as I will be working out how I mute people after I press the save button on this post.
Pretty sad life just to come on the chat board of a share you aren’t invested in to troll whilst sat in your bedroom with your mum downstairs ironing your pyjamas.
I’m not System but believe that a future raise is inevitable. They will need to raise again because - like all of the other raises and unless we receive evidence to the contrary - they do not yet have a profitable or viable business.
That's a reasonable point of view but is that not the point of what the capital markets are for? But combined with the fact that if a business can demonstrate future growth potential then investors support the company and that results in a higher share price?
There is no doubt in my mind that they have not exactly got it right so far (hence the historic share price) but they have done various things and some of these are still active and have potential. But in addition to this, the various activities that they have go involved with have then allowed them to get involved with the new Estadio venture and in my view if they can get that launched then in time they will have a significant stake in a profitable business. Estadio Bet is the single most interesting part of the whole company to me.
I see them as pretty well cashed up at the moment and with a lot of potential in this quarter (they suggested Bet may launch Q2) so we wont have to wait long to see if the company looks like they have got a strategy that will finally deliver some real value to the shareholders.
As a side point the market is littered with companies that do, then don't, then do, etc... and if you speak to many that have invested in these companies their view of that company will normally be linked to their individual period of holding the stock.
I am looking forward to the next few months and then I will see if things are taking shape.
City resorting to personal remarks once again. Is this really a TR1 of the company. The board must be totally embarrassed to see such behaviour.
What does being a TR1 have to do with it Scottyboy ? I am a shareholder like everyone or else ( not all are on here clearly ) when someone opens a new account just to troll the board they deserve all they get.
You did exactly the same on here. Probably had numerous aliases. Practice what you preach young man. Personally, I would expect a TR1 to have a little decorum and have certainly seen that with TR1's in other shares and indeed here with our other TR1's. I can just see ME, each time you go on the proverbial, with his head buried in his hands.
Chart needs more bid drops to obtain more than a pathetic dozen trades a day or less. And yes its the fault of the BOD antics this is where it is.
Systemicbods: LOL.
I would prefer a strong RNS update which would also have a similar impact in attracting interest!
Young man 😂 I wish ! not every TR1 is the same and if I want to call out BS or trolling on the board when I see it I will and I’ll also stick to defending ME and the BOD when I see fit.
I have posted often about how I feel the company has got things wrong but they have also got a lot right even though the SP doesn’t reflect this but that can be said of many other companies on AIM.
My hope is that the naysayers on here including you Scottyboy will give credit when it becomes due.
That is your perogative City ( I notice you evaded the bit of multiple aliases). It is only my opinion but as I mentioned in a previous post, a TR1 should conduct themselves more professionally. You call me a naysayer. I would consider myself to be extremely frustrated than a naysayer. I have given ME and MOS in general credit where it is due but, again my opinion, I feel that this company with all its changes in direction, placings after being told there won`t be any and failure to capitalise on opportunities within the ventures has left ME wide open to criticism from people who have invested their hard earned money into the business.
A TR1 holder is simply a person who has crossed a legal threshold in terms of how much of the company shares they have. The only professional behaviour required is to inform the market.
At the end of the day, they are no different to any other investor.
Scottyboy I’ll say it again - I apologised on this board for my indiscretion ( twice ) and I owned it - as for multiple aliases your wrong I have 1 account only.
The constant posts about how the BOD have failed are just wrong - the SP has failed but why have the NFT’s, Livescores, Bitso failed - they haven’t as they are still there and all fit into the Estadio jigsaw.
Granted income from NFT’s was not as expected but all the contracts are still there with Bitcoin strengthening and a massive marketing network about to be launched.
It’s all there to see and research I just don’t think people have grasped just how big a 27% stake in an online betting company in a massively growing market is !
So you have no right calling out somebody you think is doing the same thing if you are doing it yourself. This is why you personally hold no credit in here. Again only my opinion and only from what I read here. I know your echo chamber do not want you posting in here but you choose to ignore them. You really are a maverick type City. I know you always like the last word so will not reply to anymore on this and let you continue to make spectacle of yourself.
My issue was simply someone setting up a new account to slate the company who clearly isn’t invested and and has done no research. - nothing more Scottyboy.
As for “ my echo chamber “ I’ll post when I see fit not at the behest of other people.
“It’s all there to see and research I just don’t think people have grasped just how big a 27% stake in an online betting company in a massively growing market is !“
I’d take a guess at 27%!