The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I would very much like the directors to tell me why the subscription arrangement was even necessary, particularly at the current time. Overall, looks like a very odd deal.
It’s a company fighting to survive. But it has a plan.
Clearly pyebridge is only part of this. But it’s going to be an uphill battle foundling all this. The revenue needs to flow.
Placing of 162,500,000 shares at 0.2 included in the news …..
a mixed bag RNS ……
🤨
Well none today, bet it will finish that way too.
Forget kread, is hurt he bought 7p, and can't average in low last 6 months.
Tide is turning here
good to see low ps to buy off weak sellers --- and kread followers :) ha! lol
From funding RNS.
“ Drawdowns under the Investment will have a term of 24 months and attract an annual interest rate of 12% rolled up and paid at maturity.”
Not 6 months KREAD. Lying weasel
Keep tuggin on it kread..
24 months from date of the drawdown to pay the interest on the riverfort loan. Nothing to worry about for a while yet.
Kread is trading this like a right biatch. And why not, an instant 50-100% on each good news RNS..
Funding on the future plants is key to developments here.
The guys a weasel…
Mast will not get the investors you hope, they are a tin pot company. Their accounts are dismal. They rely on auction prices for a guaranteed income so no bank would touch that. They rely on the wind not blowing for income.
The only thing for sure you can rely on is the piggy wiggy snouts in the wages and administration trough.
If you was a bank what business model would mast tick to lend them money?
I said low 3's I reckon 3 to buy soon. They have already drawn down 450k @ 12% interest, they will draw another 500k to upgrade pyedie so 120k pa interest payments.
Riverfort will call in the loan soon after, sell the 8 mil assets for 1.5mil and walk away with a 500k profit.
All this within the next 6 months.
Last person out turn off the lights.
Lots of good effort from kread trying to keep the downward momentum going. Check his history. He has a hard on for Mast and LC.
When Mast release a financial package to bring Hindlip, Rochdale, Bordesley and stather lane (all construction ready or early construction) into play the sp will respond accordingly. Kread is right about 1 thing. As the company stands its liability’s are out of reach of just Pyebridge income.
Mast need financing news, a partner or JV ASAP.
What intrinsic values are folks selling at, pls explain........
And what in the last 2 Rns's is great.
Pls tell me, as mc cp soon to be a few hundred grand says different......
Now that what we like to see
max trolling :) getting us cheap shares on bid last 5 days.
mkt doing great fools selling well below intrinsic value.
profitability is what matters, and they doing bloody good job for the asset base they have in hand. Only part of the assets in flow.
some decent sells off loss sellers, right into the stronger hands.
not in much more yet, but looking interesting given the last few great RNS and developments :)
more to come as stated in last RNS.
long and strong
Agree that their news, statements and comments are very ambiguous and slanted to make them bigger than what they are.
They still promote themselves under the 30mw banner but that is their aim and still staye about growing to 300mw in a couple of yrs. They need to stop doing this as it is laughable.
No mention of fire at all so probably bordering market manipulation.
As gar as the assets go, mostly leasehold land I think 1 is freehold and few bits of machinery that would raise less than a mil at auction.
That's Mast for you.
Low 3s sooner than I stated.
If anyone wonders what sp**** means, then think of a word for light and sporadic. It's fortunate that sporadic doesn't end with ck otherwise I might have go a spora****.
it's hard to get a handle on mast at times as communication is generally sp**** and often obscure.
in a recent interview (around 6 weeks ago) pieter krugel stated mast had net assets of around £8m, presumably not taking into account the riverfort loan of £4m (a liability) which would reduce them to £4m. the loan came after year end so would not appear on the balance sheet which as stated shows negative equity.
in the rns of 27/02/2023 mast included the following:
"during the site's recent annual insurance cover policy review, the site's asset value was independently confirmed at c. gbp6.3m (on a conservative replacement cost basis). the site's fair asset value compared to its purchase price therefore highlights the significant upside that med's investment in pyebridge has established."
presumably this in part accounts for pieter krugel's interview comment, but is not supported by the annual accounts. investors could be forgiven for believing that mast is difficult to understand.
another piece of communication that i had difficulty with appeared in the recent accounts.
"these challenges included the necessity for remediation work at pyebridge following a fire incident which resulted in a temporary suspension of operations in the period 22 november 2022 to 17 february 2023."
i can't seem to find where this was communicated at the time, and would be grateful if any poster could point it out for me. i also can't understand how they can describe a 3 month suspension as temporary.
communication seems to be obscure and contradictory, and needs a huge improvement.
The company has negative equity.
Total equity: -UK£385k
This is considered a major risk. Being in negative equity means that the company's liabilities exceed its assets, meaning it owes more to creditors than it has in owned assets. While this doesn't mean the company is about to collapse, in the long-term, this is unsustainable. The company may have issues meeting financial obligations, is at risk of becoming insolvent and may have difficulty raising capital, especially more debt, if needed.
Currently, the following risks have been identified for the company:
Major Risks
Less than 1 year of cash runway based on free cash flow trend (-UK£727k free cash flow).
Share price has been highly volatile over the past 3 months (31% average weekly change).
Negative equity (-UK£385k).
Earnings have declined by 39% per year over the past 5 years.
Revenue is less than US$1m (UK£341k revenue, or US$426k).
Market cap is less than US$10m (UK£923.5k market cap, or US$1.15m).
Minor Risk
Shareholders have been diluted in the past year (21% increase in shares outstanding).
Eg love your intellectual input and especially your constructive thoughts.
Why not put some figures up to show me iam clueless.
Bet it will be 8mil asset value.......ha ha
No we don't Kread - and absolutely no reason to listen to an utterly clueless clown thats got nothing better to do than spam this board daily despite the fact he claims hes not invested
Go get a life and a better paying job so you can average down !
I can't see this going below 0.30p bid as buyers seem to come in when the actual offer is around 0.35p. At 0.30-0.40p one can usually pick up stock at just over mid price. At this level it does look cheap on the expectation of Pyebridge getting to full revenue generation in 18-24 weeks. On the other hand milestones will very much need to be seen to be delivered for the price to go significantly higher.
Blimey no berating for me and all gone quiet since the results.
Anybody agree low 3s soon.
The 11250000 they state is including 23 / 24 so in reality it's 812k
200k pa say and there wages and admin are 300k + pa
Not looking good.
Results as dismal as expected, they have a lot of work to do before a bank will touch Mast.
Hmmm very interesting no expansion or even mention of this from the 11/04/24 update
‘MED is currently in discussions with various potential debt and equity funders, including banking institutions that are interested to provide the necessary capex funding’
Sounds like somethings cooking - blockbuster update to follow shortly very possible
Looks like we will move back to .4-.45 in short time
Huge gap up on opening bell