Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Looks to me (& I could be very very wrong of course) but I try looks to me like it's the suspension of an on going appeal on monetary matters (accounting or payments) relating to Labor where there the appeal is challenging the validity/accuracy of the original ruling ..... it appears to me to be a 'hold' on the appeal process whilst they await a ruling/judgement of another court on another or similar (potentially linked) matter.... I'm not sure but I don't think it will necessarily halt 'shipments' but as I said I wouldn't rely on my interpretation over much
Welcome Obs.
Is the ruling we are waiting for with the labour courts?
Great find @Cause. Thanks for sharing!
http://portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=446480&ori=1
The ruling being referred to.
I have no idea. I see that interest rate has been cut in Brazil. Maybe to do with inflation.
But for now, I am just going to sit and read the board. Too hard for me to understand all this.
Hopefully this is all independent of the ruling we are waiting for as it seems to be more to do with number crunching. Hopefully.
its mostly to deal with corruption l think,
If anyone would like to know what monitory correction in Brazil financial system is
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-349-10639-4_2
cause ask barksy to pop round and ask his mate KM
lol.
Twitter can be misleading.
I tried googling it but doesn't make me understand it any better.
https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/304662237/tst-judiciario-30-06-2020-pg-5533?ref=serp
This link has a lot of suspensions, citing the same reason.
try twitter lol
cause if my daughter was here she could translate it lol
l just cannot translate it
no l went on sao paulo courts
Can someone explain to me what these two refer to?
Aggravated and repeated:
Aggravating and recurring:
@maddog - That was the translation of the link shared by Tomcat.
I also notice another ruling made on 29th with regards to Zamin.
https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/processos/207752737/processo-n-0001254-7020155210002-do-tst
cause l have seen that one but there are others l think
Missed the top part
Aggravated and repeated: Anglo Ferrous Brazil Participacoes
Aggravating and recurring: Antonio Dorival Rocha Brandao
Aggravating and recurring: Zamin Amapa Mineracao S.A. (
IN JUDICIAL RECOVERY)
This is an appeal filed against a decision of a regional Labor Court that examined the issue related to the monetary correction index linked to labor credit (TR or IPCS-e)
well. In a decision issued on 06/27/2020, in the ADC / DF no. 58, the Minister Gilmar Mendes granted an injunction to suspend the judgment of all the processes involving the subject related to the monetary update index on the constitutionality credits. of articles 879, 7, 899, 4 of the CLT (as amended by Law No. 13,467 / 17) and 39, caput, 1, of Law 8,177 / 91
In this context, it is necessary to transcribe the entire content of that preliminary injunction: -In view of the above, I grant the request made and determine, from now on, ad referendum of the Full (art. 5, 1, of Law 9,882 c / c art. 21 of Law 9,868 ) the suspension of the judgment of all ongoing proceedings in the scope of Labor Justice that involve the application of articles arts. 879, 7, and 899, 4, of the CLT, as amended by Law, No. 13,467 / 2017, and art. 39, caput and 1, of Law 8,177 / 9-
Thus, bearing in mind that the present dispute involves the issue of monetary correction and that in cases of suspension, the STF's understanding has been in the sense of granting an interpretation of procedural obstacle to the analysis of merit (Complaint 35379 / DF, Rel. Minister Alexandre de Moraes: and pet 7,755 MD / DF, Minister Alexandre de Moraes), the immediate suspension of the processing of the appeal is necessary.
In view of the foregoing, I determine the suspension of the case until further decision of that Supreme Court in ADC / AF No. 58, and the deed must await the conclusion of the judgment in the Decree of the 7th Panel.
So has it been delayed again or am I reading it wrong?
Was this today?
Some times I see the word Zamim as well. Not sure if it is an error on spelling or a different firm?
search zamin...
I've not noticed anything related to us today. Got a link? ;-)
i can’t decide if it’s constitutional... or if it’s a result of a related ruling... ;)