London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
https://twitter.com/harland_wolff1/status/1313430071424806913?s=21
Radders99 In relation to your 12.22 post I was just going to post this. I have tweeted to ask why this was not done by a RNS. The two key takeaways for me is that the workforce has almos trippled from 69 to 200 in under a year. Also 17 vessels have gone through the yard so far with another six due within the next four months.
My thoughts Stokey are that this info wouldn't need a regulatory RNS and therefore INFA don't need or want to go to the financial expense of issuing one.
17 vessels through the Yard isn't any new news to release as this info is widely known. 6 vessels booked in in next 4 months, although good news, I wouldn't envisage this being RNS-able unless one or some of these was a considerable size contract.
As for the workforce up to 200, I wasn't aware of this number and this is very positive, however on it's own, maybe not worthy of an RNS.
What is good to see is what seems like a bit more news flowing recently from INFA and H & W. These Tweets and Facebook posts give us a better idea of what's happening on the ground.
Hi Stokey - I saw your response - in line with previous Project Updates maybe could have been an RNS .. however my optimistic hat maybe thinks there is a more substantive one coming soon
ThisTimeNextYeer In relation to your 13.39 post having checked the H&W website I am slightly less concerned as the update is also on the website. But needs to be remembered that not everyone is on twitter or facebook.
That's true Stokey. I'm a good example of that, lol. I never really could get into Twitter and haven't used it to date.
That's why it's also good that yourself and a lot of other folk share info here. All info shared is appreciated.
Re RNS's. I know there's a cost for companies to issue these, but does anyone here know what the actual approximate costs are ? Lottie maybe , or any other financial folk here with experience or knowledge of these costs ?
Looks like the tweet has been removed........
RNS in the morning then. ;)