Listen to our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode 'Uncovering opportunities with investment trusts' with The AIC's Richard Stone here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
StrictlyZinc
"Now thatβs more like it!!"
How's the 1.2m compare to the 25m dumped by the Chairman/founder?
It's around 5% of the number dumped by him, isn't it?
Likewise, how does the 1.2m trade compare to the >7m options held by the CEO?
So if a 1.2m trade is 'big boys' have arrived, what is 25m dumped by the chairman or the 7m options held by the CEO, due to become exercisable in few months then?
u r a ****
To be honest.
If stt1 didn't spend 95% of his time posting on a stock he hates I might listen to some of his views... BUT!
Imagine being so bad at investing that you don't have any stock interests except hounding a share that you are bearish on? weird psychology.
Best not to say anything anymore. He will on twist it round to his obligatory post about the CEO and chairman/founder. Happy with the development and happy to hold regardless of what that twat has to say.
Sacked for Gross Misconduct
Leave him to fester!
If after all this time, the best argument against me is nothing better than trying to bully me into silence by posting on unrelated threads I contribute to tells me that I'm probably right in my views. If you could counter what I say with any kind of cogent, rational argument you would have by now.
The fact is the chairman/founder dumped majority of his holding in a discounted secondary placing.
The CEO has >7m options, awarded a year ago and now exercisable from a few months time.
Revenue/Order book growth has slowed significantly.
Some on here have no conviction in their investment and so pulling the wool over any gullible readers is their way of ramping the share.
Is it a coincidence that the following shares, which I also posted the company newsflow, facts and opinions on those facts, the red flags etc eventually crashed due to those red flags and posters from there also deramped TLY to pull the wool over gullible reader's eyes???.
Byot down 99.9% (now delisting), Trmr down 80%, rthm down 80%, Nano down 60%
" bully me into silence by posting on unrelated threads"
Says the man who's spent years and thousands of posts on a stock he owned for a couple of months max
" If you could counter what I say with any kind of cogent, rational argument you would have by now."
Tried, numerous times in fact. You run a mile anytime someone directly challenges your points, or completely ignore them and paste the same nonsense again to bury it.
You also constantly move the goalposts on your derampe, every time someone points out how absurd one or more of your points are, eg: stopped posting about "shares on loan" ten times a day. Stopped posting about cash position now you realise how strong it is. Stopp posting about CEO selling shares, after you realised he didn't sell any.
The list goes on
Hallsworthy
"Tried, numerous times in fact. You run a mile anytime someone directly challenges your points, or completely ignore them and paste the same nonsense again to bury it."
Have you? You've even gone quiet on TLY, where you were deramping with misleading info.
They published their fy TU, positive update.
Shares currently up 19%.
c40% held by IIs
Chairman was buying.
No placing as some suggested.
HVO:
Red flags - prove you do reply and discuss or do your usual divert away.
Red flags/bear points:
Chairman dumped majority of his holding:
The chairman dumped majority of his holding in a discounted secondary placing at 28p. Nearly 3 months ago. Where's all the significant holdings by IIs?
The chairman would know the business better than anyone else, would he?
CEO has huge >7m options
He was awarded the options last year and they start to become exercisable early next year, not long now.
Having huge options awarded results in the company being talked up. Given the options are due to be exercised in a few months, it's not surprising that they were talked up. Why give huge options to the CEO?
Revenue/order book growth has reduced significantly. There's no evidence of significant revenue/order book growth, despite the new facility.
New facility:
The new facility was largely paid for by clients, who are likely to want favourable terms in return.
Given the cash, why didn't they pay for the new facility themselves?
So starting from the 1st one, prove my facts and opinions based on those facts are wrong.
Are you still at it stt1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr_s34rH8TM
Give up the ghost pal
Https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7193888560775602176
Yes stt1, you know full well I've tried to debate your points. Like you always say, go back and read over posting history and see how many times you go silent with direct questions.
Ps what's wrong with shares on loan?
Thanks for the reminder on TLY, believe it or not some of us have better things to do than post insessently on bulletin boards but I'll up my posting on TLY now as you've asked so nicely
Canny 'Red flag' like. The share has never been more stable since he 'dumped'. lolololol
The market doesnt agree with stt1
Sold, not necessarily 'Dumped'.
You seem to be implying some sinister association.
He sold 55% of his then holdings, and can I believe aquire more through options.
He still owns a considerable quantity of shares .
3 Months ago, the Chairman suddenly sold > 50% of his holding because he believed there was still significant upside and wanted to help the IIs and their clients gain the potential.
Is that better?
If he had sold some as the sp had risen then fair enough.
However, the sp was rising on the back of lots of tips, repeated presentations and then SUDDENLY the Chairman sold > 50% of his holding at a DISCOUNT!! Even though the original placing said they were selling only 25%.
That to me, is dumping majority of his holding.
That is a red flag.
If you believe he still retains a significant number then the number he dumped was > than the number he retains. Therefore, by your definition he dumped, I mean sold, a very significant number.
Plus if the number retains, 21m, is still significant then the 7m options awarded to the CEO must also be significant.
Those are red flags in my book.
Contrary to Hallsworthy/Moniman etc the newsflow has been as per my assertions that they were talked up to sell.
The growth rate has slowed significantly. The Chairman knows the comany better than anyone else.
As to TLY.
Note Hallsworthy/Moniman/BillB have gone quiet on the TLY thread. The company announced a good TU, with Β£106m revenues. c40% IIs. Mcap Β£12m
The shares up 40%+ over the week.
No wonder the HVO posters Hallsworthy/Moniman/BillB have gone quiet.
Redx another one of moniman's ramps delisting. Follows on from 1gw_'s Byot last month.
STT1, have you ever considered selling your shares if you're that concerned? Or if you already have, why are you wasting your time on here commenting on a company you aren't invested in? To me it sounds like you live a very sad and boring life trying to brainwash others. Or you're a disgruntled ex employee? If you invested as much time on here writing nonsense and looking into other future investment ideas you'd be a millionaire by now.
I've posted the company newsflow, facts and opinions based on those facts.
If you don't like the facts that's your choice.
It's over 3 months since the chairman dumped majority of his holding.
Prior to him doing so and since Dec, there were regular tips, presentations, talking the company up.
Where's all the IIs rns showing significant buying 3 months ago?
Where's all the repeated presentations, tips gone? AGM come and gone and no TU.
Broken record and worn out stylus
Another month gone... now approaching 4 months since the Chairman dumped majority of his holding in a discounted secondary placing at 28p.
The newsflow has been as predicted.
Still no evidence to counter my bear points or red flags by rampers.
Chairman dumped majority of his holding.
---------------------------------------------------------
Still no evidence of significant buying/holdings(TR1s) by institutionS in February.
Newsflow has been as I predicted.
HVO still no evidence of significant buying/holding by InstitutionS.
Why have the HVO gang of rampers gone quiet?
Is it because TLY still c40% held by InstitutionS.
TLY up 50% over past few weeks.
43p to 7p is the last 2 years , gutted I missed that awesome stock ππππ. What a joke !
Geordie,
TLY up another 12% today as Labour and Tories set out their pitches for the NHS. NHS is always used as a political football. It can win GE for a party or break them.
How much HVO rise following their long awaited contract?
Nearly 4 months and HVO still below the price the Chairman dumped majority of his holding. He knows the company better than anyone else.