London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Amazed the share price continues to fall when we have the answer to Covid certification. No sales and no comms, what are they doing?
Given Synovate is say 1 month old and its effectively done two, what many would call, commercial proof of concepts, plus CTEA alone secured NPH-Group in August, we should be entering rich newsflow territory.
We have no idea what CTEA is working on - a double edged sword from an sp perspective ie no exciting speculative bubble but guaranteed the market won't therefore see it coming.
DShox, I hope you are right. Interesting article in the Telegraph at the weekend featuring a family flying to Hong Kong stopped because their Covid certificate didn’t comply with the HK authorities latest code. Ctea had a great idea, hopefully someone will take notice
Lots of news over the weekend about schools and colleges being told to get all students back using mass tests in Jan and sheer lack of preparation and trained capacity. Also increasingly seeing reports of people stopped with fake immunity passports.
The fake immunity passports will be a problem. That's why Ctea Blockchain looks like a good answer to the problem
"The fake immunity passports will be a problem. That's why Ctea Blockchain looks like a good answer to the problem"
Go on, explain this to me. How is CTEA blockchain the answer to the problem?
Crizmo from CTEAs website:- "we use irrefutable blockchain technology" "Using undisputed blockchain technology, we help business ensure your workforce is truly accountable. And importantly, your people and customers can have complete confidence in the processes you use to manage and protect them."
Hopefully blockchain is secure and can’t be faked, or am I wrong? Happy to be corrected
Thanks for the expert but I've seen the website. That doesn't answer the question though, does it?
People aren't hacking the databases of other apps and changing their results. They are just using fake images/apps on their phone. How is CTEA going to stop this any more than any other company can?
Plenty of material out there to learn about Blockchain, so suggest confused individuals go and research.
Opportunity to land contracts and start improving market comms. The playing field is vast.
How do you stop fakes? With a barcode scanner? Like saying how do you stop fake tickets for concerts. Easy to say you’re going to do it - harder to actually do plus can’t imagine there’s that big of an incentive to fake say a vaccination or LFT
Crizmo...you've just talked yourself into the filter bin...I work in the Blockchain environment and unless you've got a quantum computer then the blocks of data are immutable.
Now feck off.
Crizmo's got 4 Dells wired together - he's a senior systems engineer for a £5bn cap company don't you know :)
posted?
"Imagine a world where when somebody posts there's "been no commercial sales", "no interest" because "Blockchain's too expensive", one could instantly test its accuracy."
I have never posted "been no commercial sales". If you read my post I said "Still no paying customers for CovID" which is 100% true.
I guess you're right. I can't say for certain that there has been no interest. Maybe someone enquired about CovID and then decided against buying it. I can say that no-one has bought the product though.
The third 'Quote' "Blockchain's too expensive" is another figment of your imagination. I never said that either. Here's what I said
"Blockchain is expensive. That would be my guess to the main reason as to why no-one wants CovID."
I'm not sure what your first paragraph is about
"The most opportune time to highlight the core proposition of Blockchain - it records, in the most secure manner possible, the immutable truth so that all stakeholders can record, trust and transact data and value"
That's not true. It's not the most secure manner possible. Until a blockchain is running at a certain scale, it's actually easier to compromise than a more traditional model.
So, I made one statement, about there being no interest, that I can't verify. The rest is, as you put it. The Immutable truth.
If you want to look at people posting lies. Maybe you want to look below at some statements you've made recently.
"Newcastle Health has bought COV-ID and Guy describes the value in building credibility. An insurance industry company is also using it." Lies. No-one has bought Cov-ID. NPH are trialing Onsite-ID. Not CovID
"but almost every single top rank business is quietly investing into Blockchain". Got any proof of that. I work in tech for a company worth over 5bn. We looked at blockchain and decided it's too costly. It's also slower than traditional infrastructure. It can't do as many transactions per second. I'm sure, being a blockchain expert, you already knew that though.
Some classic crizmo quotes for crizmas :)
"There's been no commercial sales" and "no interest". Wrong, refer to 25 Aug RNS
"Blockchain is too expensive" hence why there's "been no interest". Oops :)
"It's not the most secure manner possible. Until a blockchain is running at a certain scale, it's actually easier to compromise than a more traditional model." Ah, so you did say its hackable and easier than a "traditional model". 5 Dells should do it! ;)
"Newcastle Health has bought COV-ID and Guy describes the value in building credibility. An insurance industry company is also using it." Lies. No-one has bought Cov-ID. NPH are trialing Onsite-ID. Not CovID." Re-read 25 Aug RNS slower than you've ever done before and look at NPH's website for the correct answer.
This is my favourite. "I work in tech for a company worth over 5bn. We looked at blockchain and decided it's too costly. It's also slower than traditional infrastructure. It can't do as many transactions per second. I'm sure, being a blockchain expert, you already knew that though". So my view, if you put a donkey in charge. Synovate's website states its global platform is 4x faster than Visa's global platform and its low cost scalability is one of Blockchain's core value propositions.
Keep changing your message but it's all here.
BB entertainment while we wait.