Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
10th May 2024
Further to the update of 26th April, the anomalies which related to paper share certificates issued by the Company in 2018 and very early 2019 are still largely unresolved and once the Paying Agent has eventually concluded their exhaustive work, notifications will again commence in 2025. Happy New Year to all our dear Cloudtag shareholders.
The Company still remains under strict non-disclosure agreements (yes, still). All further (and there will be plenty more) updates will be published on www.cloudtag.com stating nothing more than the previous update.
We thank shareholders (those still alive) for their never-ending patience.
Nice 1 Enzo, let’s expose this fraud . Let everyone in the financial world know that this maggot is a sc um. He is operating a scam using multiple identities on lse , to create an impression that there is a real company or product. In reality nothing exists just a fraud at the end of his puny existence.
Don’t be daft, pikeyk, i can’t tell you why you believe that enzo is only pretending to be a shareholder … that’s your idea, not mine. (me, i just take his post at face value … i assume that enzo is a cloudtag shareholder who is understandably frustrated and angry at the disappearance of his money and is seeking redress.)
… looks like you are just trying to evade the question.
? what are you imagining the motive would be for someone like enzo to pretend, at this late stage of the cloudtag game? — if those deals are utterly genuine and fully completed as amit has claimed, then no posts on this chatboard will make any difference to the fabulous payouts that will soon be sent to shareholders; so why would someone pretend to be a shareholder here if they are not?
You tell me? You could also question the reason TW reported cloudtag to the FCA and AIM regulation when he clearly wasn't a cloudtag holder, what do you think his real motive was? You can be sure it wasn't for the benefit of anyone outside his little circlejerk.
? if you believe that enzo is not a cloudtag shareholder, pikeyk, then what do you think that his motive would be for pretending to be one and posting about contacting the police … what do you imagine the purpose of that would be for someone not holding cloudtag shares?
(given that this share is not trading on any marketplace, so it’s not like anyone can be looking to daytrade by ramping or deramping).
A lot of fine actors treading these boards as you well know spike.
( & same question to you would also apply re folks like 1984, petebo, *****, doug … there’s plenty of ids on here that you’ve trolled who seem pretty likely to be shareholders, without you ever making any attempt to contribute to any sensible discussion of cloudtag itself.)
? do you think enzo is not a shareholder, pikeyk? - you seem happy enough to troll him.
The key word is shareholders spike, the non invested advfn overspill that shot themselves in the foot (but somehow that's my fault?) are totally fair game
PikeyK 08:40: “to me it looks like your focus is bickering with randoms on here, blowing smoke up your own hoop and trolling other shareholders…”
lol, that from an account which was set up solely and specifically to troll other posters on this chatboard. the pikeyk ID has never done anything else.
I don’t think his personal domicile would be particularly relevant one way or the other ( … e.g. if your normal domicile is in vietnam but you murder somebody in london, it’s still gonna be the met that gets involved, not the hanoi plod!).
The bank transfers done for pre ipo were done in the UK i believe, plus he has domicile here unless im mistaken.
B3ast, i’d still have the same question; UK police would be focused on alleged crimes committed in UK jurisdiction. i’m afraid i don’t understand what kind of offence enzo is thinking may have been conducted on UK soil.
(? i am presuming, perhaps wrongly, that enzo doesn’t mean the st vincent police force, who is quite busy at the moment rescuing a cat up a tree, after which he has his lunch-break scheduled.)
Spikey I presume he reported Amit himself not the company.
Police force in which country? - e.g. bit hard to see how any of this would be any interest to the UK police force … since cloudtag is not based in UK & not operating in UK.
@Hits/Dougb worst thing is her post got 7 recommendations.
the day reality hits will be a hard one for sure
lol, ******o over here thinking a police reference number is a winning lottery ticket, be sure to pop back when he's safely behind bars there's a good lad.
Today, I reported Amit to the police and obtained a police reference number. He has taken thousands of pounds from shareholders based on false information and fabricated emails. Additionally, I reported his family for their involvement and apparent enjoyment of the shareholders money at our expense. Lets bring him down and make him pay!!!!
we must be due another **** update on the website with more **** and lies i can not believe people on here are still thinking we are going to get payed out of this
"I happen to think the narrative that he's told us in consequent updates from the time rings true - he even embarrassingly (for him) admitted he's messed up on his statements regarding timescales which he didn't have to do. still very positive here."
Helx you dodged the question about a line in the sand. I therefore conclude you will be happy with endless delays. How about if I shift my Q3 suggestion to Q4 this year? Surely without any notifications/payments by then your positivity may start to waiver no?
"my focus is on ABH"
Really? to me it looks like your focus is bickering with randoms on here, blowing smoke up your own hoop and trolling other shareholders, lang may your hoop reek.
Is more pitiful than frightening. Obviously this is then just an opinion.. Reasons and evidential justification ? & allow me to explain :
She had again re-contacted me 8 weeks ago (copy & pasted onto her yesterday’s deleted thread) after a peaceful hiatus of 3 years and it was simply a “sigh” that i then let out. Her arguments as highlighted per 21:41 have always been incoherent. Mixed with her regular dyslexic inputs these then created a very tiresome effect, where it regularly takes time and effort to try & decipher her posts. IMO then and still is now, she was best ignored.
Her opening message 8 weeks ago was highlighting her new bb ID & of ‘a need for a new platform to air her story’.
Her 2nd message was then two weeks later to enquire why i had gone silent. This was the effect her previous history of incoherent posts had on me.
Pitiful indeed was the woman whose family had lost significantly due to their belief in ABH and at 1st i thought ‘quite plucky’ looking after her family interests. But after her performance (or lack of) it soon became apparent that her arguments were no longer welcomed by those seeking any sort of resolution to the ongoing ABH charades.
Pitiful is the woman who then started to troll my posts when she was politely first told that her own posts were illogical.
Pitiful is the woman who then opened yesterday’s thread which was entirely centred on trying to flame me.
I’m an auld fashioned guy and my focus is on ABH so i don’t take any prisoners. I simply gave her both blasts of the barrel, naming & shaming her, such that she then removed the thread that she had created. No apologies for the lack of remorse in calling out pitiful.
There is a time for balanced perspective and then eventually there is a time for totally focused actions. Hopefully Admin will now delete this thread such that we can all wait quietly for the next instalment of ‘your cheques are in the post’.
Whispering states "Are you really sure you want to hear (?) given your recent prolific postings, are you really open to the opinions of others, do you really want a balanced perspective?"
For the record and having long been a fan of devil's advocacy as a significantly enlightening tool, my POV is that opinions of others - and especially counter-opinions - are potentially the most useful opinions of all...
...BUT ONLY if backed up by a) reason and b) evidential justification. Otherwise they're just facile contradictory noise and don't represent "balance" in even the slightest way.
Whispering then goes on to say "Then you can be full of your own convictions to your hearts content … perhaps it’s exactly what you aim to achieve?"
Two words. Pot... kettle.
Whispering begins to sound frighteningly like toffers from the EUA board. eeek!
“fools talk, cowards are silent, wise men listen'
& it ain't too difficult to work out which we are. “
“Would be interesting to hear something more substantial than ‘i feel it in my water’…” Dougb189
Are you really sure you want to hear (?) given your recent prolific postings, are you really open to the opinions of others, do you really want a balanced perspective … No?
Re stalker - we both know that given past conversations this absolutely isn’t the case.
Though should you carry on berating folk within the manor in which you have today, then I’d imagine the filter button will be well used. Then you can be full of your own convictions to your hearts content … perhaps it’s exactly what you’re aim to achieve?
I am not a fraud, nor in Amit’s corner, though I recognise similar traits between you both.
He knows my thoughts exactly, without uncertainty!
Perhaps a walk out within them Scottish hills will enable a readjusted “wobble” to the head.
“Opinionated people are never celebrated… are they? “ [moi]
Dyslexic… perhaps - well yes - though I try not to let it hinder
Intoxicated… No.
Shame on you