RE: SpikeyjToday 09:45
Yes, Beretta, I am aware of at least some of the instances you mention (including the gravest). Notwithstanding, while Amit was looking to raise money at any time on the back of the CTAG fairytale - and as you yourself will be aware, this continued long after delisting - pointing out (with hard evidence) how farcical this was as an investment was surely no bad thing.
IN somewhat similar vein, I have more than once thought that the CTAG/Amit/snake oil saga was worthy of media attention. It has all the ingredients that would make for an interesting exposé, either via TV documentary or piece in one of the more serious national newspapers, if only a decent journalist could be got to pay interest. There is currently without doubt a public appetite for these sorts of things - cf. Mr. Bates vs the Post Office, which has vague similarities in terms of ordinary and quite genuine people being stitched up.
Yes, the CTAG fiasco doesn't have the billion dollar scale or the Silicon Valley glamour of a major league medtech fraud, such as Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos, which became the subject of myriad articles and more than one TV documentary. But then again, unlike CTAG, Theranos's investors weren't exactly ordinary working people... yes, Rupert Murdoch, Larry Ellison, Henry Kissinger and their like may have lost dollar amounts running into seven figures, but that won't have been life-changing for them. But for the more normal investors in CTAG, this fraud has in all too many cases been hugely damaging.
Perhaps the biggest benefit of an exposé piece would be as a cautionary tale about investing in AIM small caps, highlighting the perils of herd mentality, confirmation bias and unwittingly relying on echo chambers (where the narrative is almost entirely defined by disingenuous cheerleaders) for one's information. It'd also underline the fact that there is effectively no regulation of the AIM market... the FCA is notorious both for its inaction and its resulting impotence, and as for PIs relying on a Nomad to be their guardian of truth and rectitude? Everyone should be brought to realise that that statement is a particularly sick joke, since Nomads will sign any old BS off in exchange for their retainer fee, lunch at the Ivy and the occasional case of claret.
If more people had been aware of the above before taking their first step into the pile of stinking doodoo that is CTAG, they might well have trodden more carefully. After all, forewarned is forearmed...