The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
You actually believe your short is going to be paid out……………..How quaint🤣🤣🤣
Nothing ‘quaint’ about the ‘trailer trash’ on here
You actually think posting rubbish on here 24/7 is fulfilling?
How quaint!
Watch your inbox folks
You actually believe what the website say's? How quaint :-)
“significant shareholdings”
They’re on the Cloudtag website
There are some important differences, whispering.
(including, for instance, what and when AIM-listed UK companies vs private listed st vincent companies need to disclose to their shareholders and the wider market about company financials and significant shareholdings, including BoD share purchases and share sales.)
My understanding Spike, St Vincent Articles of Association (which the company is registered according to the website) aren’t too different from a public company still trading on UK’s AIM market.
St Vincent - Article 43 - refers to- The Directors may in their absolute discretion refuse to register or transfer any shares … in line with said article 43
You never fail to try and antagonise also mislead. It’s perhaps worth remembering shareholders rely on Amit being transparent - via the website, it’s his duty as CEO. From my observation updates have relayed the company’s status quo.
Chimers - my thoughts same as yours, I also asked HL their opinion ref it being a scam / fraudulent etc, ( I didn’t expect them to comment ) but he thought that after 6 years of nothing it would be very foolish to now put statements on company website, when he could have let sleeping dogs lie.
GLA Jayne
Where has that freaky Sheriff of the AIM disappeared to. Has he managed to mug off a few more idiots to read his crap before going into a forced hiding.
I think Winni knows what’s coming to him after spouting so much crap over the years and all in print, what a wobble.
Talking about spouting a load of tosh, that Scottish chap seems to be progressing well up a cul-de-sac👍
Re 13:07, issue is not whether or not whispering thinks such changes ‘should’ or shouldn’t be notified for transparency.
it’s whether or not such notifications/disclosures are or aren’t **legally required by the st vincent jurisdiction** (if that is still where cloudtag is registered) for this unlisted, private, overseas company.
(happy to read any relevant specific requirements anyone can cite from st vincent regulatory bodies.)
my own understanding is that the reporting & disclosure requirements for that kind of company are very different from those mandated for a public company still trading on UK’s AIM market.
JLCI, Corporate negotiations do take a long time
My Friend was involved in the sale of a British port, That took a couple of years to get the
money after the first official handshake.
thats the reason I'm in no sweat
Sorry posted some parts twice !
Further to my posts yesterday, I called HL again this morning,, their corporate dept have confirmed no further communications have been received from Ctag since mid March. I was told that these “corporate actions can take a long time “ !! Lol. Again please don’t shoot the messenger, I’m just passing on what I was told, I appreciate we were already aware of this as it’s been discussed on here in the past.
Whispering - thank you for your post yesterday
GLA Jayne
Whispering - thank you for your post yesterday
GLA Jayne
“also, although the company has previously announced it would not register share transactions between third parties, so far as i am aware there would be nothing to prevent the company from changing or suspending that policy, and so far as i am aware there be no obligation to report any such change to shareholders.”
I disagree, shareholders should be notified of any changes which were made in past updates. For transparency
“So over $275M has been spent and yet to date there is not one single peep of acknowledgment, not one single listing anywhere, not one mention that these 2 clients had then purchased 0.25 of a Billion $’s worth of commodities ?”
Which may then suggest said buyers aren’t ready to make an announcement to the market for whatever reason?
Then Amit should make this clear to shareholders instead of re-hashed updates, also said anomalies with the capital share book, which one could read as collectively being delaying tack-ticks?
(Presumably you meant) post ‘..not contacted or not paid anyone..’
Yes, not contacted!!!!
Re 09:19, it has been quite a while since an updated figure was given on cloudtag’s website for amit’s personal holding - so it would be interesting to know what the company believes the current figure to be.
so far as i am aware, there would be nothing to stop the company from purchasing shares from one shareholder, if it wished, and then selling those shares on to another investor (i.e. without having to issue new shares).
also, although the company has previously announced it would not register share transactions between third parties, so far as i am aware there would be nothing to prevent the company from changing or suspending that policy, and so far as i am aware there be no obligation to report any such change to shareholders.
(Presumably you meant) post ‘..not contacted or not paid anyone..’
which then relies on an alleged deposit which may or may not be held by an agent or held in a bank in Chicago and whose only existence has then been supported by the many Ctag notices, which have then been consistently proven to be reckless with the truth.
Consider that in both payments, the funds have been released by the clients.
The SaaP has cleared escrow & is allegedly sitting with the agent & the DaaP “had” been cleared for payment ‘’by end of week 16th October [2023]’’.
And it was NOT the client but ABH who then opted to delay, allegedly for extra %.
That these funds had allegedly been cleared, means there is no sitting requirement for NDA’s pertaining to the clients previous requests.
So over $275M has been spent and yet to date there is not one single peep of acknowledgment, not one single listing anywhere, not one mention that these 2 clients had then purchased 0.25 of a Billion $’s worth of commodities ?
Better to be silent and let people think you are a fool
rather than open your mouth and let people KNOW you are a fool
Take note of TW's council, NOW that did make me laugh
Anything is possible in this game bud. IF things do go well here, we are looking at a further shares rinse.
Not sure which mouth would be the most vulgar:
with TW you simply stand back a meter and then take note of his counsel.
With ABH you will then immediately ask for a second opinion. Both need rinsing with carbolics.
There have been a good few disruptors on this board over time. HairyGrotBox springs to mind, all came on here, supporting Amit, and perhaps trying to distract from the issue at hand. The issue at hand now, if I am not mistaken, is contacting shareholders/brokers and subsequently paying shareholders once these additional (additional) anomalies are ironed out. Perhaps that can be finally done, if not, then the (strong) argument remains, why, after all this time, has Amit/The Company/Paying agents contacted or paid anyone? It's all they have to do, after all, they have the funds, don't they?
*opens his mouth
*his mouth
*that mouth
*those teeth
*🤮
Cool story bro but I think we all know TW is in hiding (re: cloudtag) cos he'll get rinsed if he opens mouth, amirite?
Lol but i have to ask bud, were you a COPL shareholder?
Your argument (albeit a lot lot more coherent than those coming from the whine o’clock club) is very reminiscent of COPL bb’s ‘death throes’ arguments : Put simply, they ignored every one of his warnings and went even further, suggesting the man was.. well, a complete loony.
Then after the fires had extinguished such that only scant evidence was being procured, they then all amusingly squealed ‘send for Tom.. where’s Tom?’ !! [i kid you not, unbelievably this actually happened].
The prospect of Tom entering a burnt out building which some might argue, he had set on fire (figuratively) would be quite silly, on a par say with arguing with a drunkard ??
But.. perhaps though helps explain why ABH keeps sending out those nonsensical updates…. Darn. You might actually be on to something there bud.