focusIR May 2024 Investor Webinar: Blue Whale, Kavango, Taseko Mines & CQS Natural Resources. Catch up with the webinar here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Very reassuring all the positive comments, genuine questions & helpful feedback from everyone who is seriously interested in progressing our case further. My own obvious niggling doubts have been thoroughly covered by MC & by others more knowledgeable, that whatever other shareholder's circumstances, I hope that many are able to contribute in our endeavour, however long it takes. ATB.
Thanks edgein, like I said couldn’t get on call, yes can get £550 but worried about more costs along the way. I have everything in this well over 300k and am now skint!!!!
Knw,
Well I guess its down to the scale of the loss, folks with larger holdings can afford to pay more. £550 isn't that much considering the potential for the amount of possible return. He suggested that more costs are unlikely, but if something crops up he would let the group know. Buy my impression its a one off for phase 1 before progressing to the no win no fee case. His comments on settling early and not going to court were very interesting, so folks should attend a call if possible.
Regards,
Ed.
Wasn’t able to get on the call, is there a reason the larger holders are paying more? Will this carry on with more costs Down the line and if we are successful is there a % taken off or have the fees covered everything? Sorry if this was all covered on call. Thank u too everyone who is putting in the work here for the rest of us
Stas fair enough but I was not implying that you were picking on or bullying, just saying that everyone's point of view should be listened too.
Also stas thanks for all of your input, we could not do this without guys like yourself, for example I would not have a clue to do what you guys having putting together,
Thanks again.
@duster, read my posts, no one has been picked on or bullied, what has happened is that a person’s line of questioning has been questioned.
It is a reasonable position to take, particularly in light of the past where we have had almost mirror image of alias's that have been registered years ago, never posted, then suddenly change from never posting to actually posting a lot, often with a negative or very questioning approach with subtle undertones.
Like the proverbial iron fist in a velvet glove, they often show outward support whilst always pushing forward with what eventually becomes seen as an ulterior motive, nearly always culminating in the uncovering of that motive into the ultimate negative rhetoric, followed by a disappearance of the alias until the next (registered anew, or an older non poster) suddenly appears to restart the same narrative.
I am old enough and wise enough in the ways here to err on the side of caution and disregard what these posters have to say. I can be wrong, but in my opinion, with the level of disruption we have had to endure in the past, I accept an error in my judgement is a tiny err on my side, to the risk of disruption that comes from engaging.
I actually don't think that you are just here to disrupt, everyone should be able to voice their thoughts and opinions on the relevant subject matter and not be picked on or bullied. 🤔😮
Stas I’ve been reading the board for years hoping this would come good but with everything that’s gone on since December I decided to post. I’m sure there are many shareholders out of the 400 signed up that don’t post, if you want to be part of the bb you’ve got to post at sometime. Maybe I shouldn’t have bothered
I think the host closed entry after 9.30
There are two more days of presentations you can join so won't miss out
Same here
Meeting at full capacity.. Cant join
Thanks Stas 👍
Wwal, I posted a set here the other day (28 Apr 2024 11:10) which have also been posted to MC and acknowledged.
They have. Additional questions still possible on calls too.
Just wondering if the CAG or some of our other prominent commentators (Stas) have complied a list of questions for Mr Cotter on these Zoom meetings?
My past post was obviously in error being more a statement than a question, thus with a simple punctuation mark and a small addition, I feel it can be better used to convey the correct message.
"wow isn't it amazing that someone that has apparently lost thousands, been here for over 3 years only now decides to post, as if the No win no fee was the most important thing to ever discuss. I guess the 99% drop in the share price in the past, or the massive shorting, or the resignation of several CEO's etc. none of those were important enough to comment but heh, a well qualified lawyer that might defend the shareholders being defrauded by a load of crooks, seems to be a concern to you, I wonder which side you bat for"?
Ryan, may I ask, why are you only posting now?
It's a binding order by the High Court my friend. It cannot be stopped. Mr Justice Yamauchi has made his decision. Other matters are able to be brought to Court of course but this order is binding which is why Mr Justice Yamauchi was very thorough ensuring that there was plenty of time for questions at the end of the Hearing.
And there we have it :)
Missed the word ‘tree’
Why on earth would I want to get the class action count down, I’m probably going to join myself once I’ve heard what mr cotter has to say and the more that join potentially the less I’ll have to fork out. I’ve challenged the cag on a few things that I didn’t understand and got a decent response from Rodney which I’m happy with. You’re barking up the wrong mate.
Ryan=Avavio. Simples
“RBM, not being funny but I have lost thousands in this. I don't agree with your view, If this can be stopped now and a legitimate SISP is put in place (and not by KSV) surely that is better than doing nothing and proceeding with a class action that could take years. We can still do a class action if the new SISP does not deliver to shareholders. COPL, KSV, Summit and maybe Anavio are in cohorts on this to allow summit to get the assets as cheap as possible.
BP have stated that the solicitation process was flawed, KSV didn't contact enquiries, they didn't give enough time for the process, the actual documentation they sent out was laughable, no mention of how much oil we have or its worth, its as if all the oil has disappeared. What's in the DATA room, have COPL been selective as too what's in there, who knows. All I know is this process needs to be stopped beforehand rather than letting it go through and then spending years trying to recover our money that may or may not be successful.
Kenneth Anderson stated in his closing statement on the affidavit
'The debtors own and operate SUBSTANTIAL oil and gas holdings which must be adequately exposed for a time and at a price floor that will stimulate the greatest possible interest '
'the process in this case was chilling and ineffective'
BP know what we have and I think they are being careful with what they say. Our NAV was close to £500 million without the fed deep discovery, add that on and who knows what its really worth.“
His first post….
Read this again. Ryan is here to disrupt. Calculated words to sow seeds of doubt, to get the class action numbers down. Simples
Thought I’d start a new thread. Ryan is getting paid double time at the moment, with a thread named after him.
He knows his stuff, had just surfaced recently, not part of any shareholder action yet spends his days at present like Andy Dufresne with his rock hammer, chipping away. Reasonably clever lad, yet still too obvious. Ignore him. It’s his pay masters that matter.