London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Has anyone seen the FT article about a potential revolt? Doesn't seem overly promising. Also for us to say that it won't be until 2024 before pre-covid attendance levels are reached is potentially alarming.
I think there's very important things behind the scenes that needs clarifying/sorting. It's key to confidence. Not sure how markets are going to react on this one. Hopefully the positive articles make a difference, but it's a complete toss up atm
This is old news, especially about pre attendance levels
Fast losing any credibility.
sorry Ash but you seem like a complete "toss up". More and more deramping with each week that goes by.
Ashes when was this FT article? You seem a bit vague on the content. Bit vague on everything.
I think this is the report ashstash is on about.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.ft.com/content/fedafcec-8af6-4fcc-a631-f408065ef121&ved=2ahUKEwjmjZPXzb7wAhWF7aQKHS9XCioQvOMEegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw1L9k69vLSjO84J_NMQQ7Gk&cf=1
Make of it what you want, some articles are a bit like mootly fool and just repeats the same rubbish. However to be fair to ashstash he may of thought this is new news as it only came out the weekend.
Personally I see it as mootly fool material.
As a matter of fact of you type cineworld and financial times in the same sentence on Google its hard to find a positive report on cineworld , wonder if these are the same writers as mootlt fool
Am I also right in saying rupert murdoch is some way involved with the financial Times, who also has a large stake in disney who have a steaming service , hmmmmmmm maybe wrong
Bonkers,
It is a second coming of the same "revolt" we saw when the LTIP was actually voted on.
It passed with ease (can't mind numbers, but something like 90%).
FT and Rupert the bear have conflicting interests to Cineworld so have for this last year taken every opportunity they can and often when there was no story have made one up.
Anyone, absolutely anyone that is even remotely serious about share investment and a holder in this share for more than 5 minutes would have done their research and know latest article is a straight in the round file piece.
Not worthy of any comment.
You know what is funny about you lot? You go on as if there's rules to what shareholders should be saying. All I did was state something that I wasn't aware of, as I've not been keeping up. Ok, it may be old or irrelevant r whatever, but all this 'deramper' nonsense is just you guys getting way ahead of yourself. The sp is where it is for a reason and my opinion is that things like this play a part. As I've stated many times, I'm happy where I'm at in terms of holding and staying in for my target. However, let's not kid ourselves. We've been stagnant and there's reasons for this. If I'm wrong about news etc or not saying credible things, then so be it, but the trend isn't up atm. I've taken a literal long term few and don't think we'll reach what some people think we should be for 6-9 months perhaps.
Now most of you will simply say I'm deramping, instead of saying,' respectfully, your opinion isn't to my liking' or something like that. I didn't know that every shareholder must believe the sp will reach certain levels because of articles and opinions. That's what I've noticed with some if you. It's just as credible as what I've said, which isn't that credible according to you guys. We'll see anyway, I'm sure we will be over £1 in no time at all. Some of you lost me when you kept saying that it should be higher etc. It wil be higher when it's meant, not because of news articles and covid stats