Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Got mine.
Indeed, Mr Tibbles, you are thinking along the same lines as Blackrock who are shifting out of government bonds into real estate. It's just another example of the move from public to private assets. Even our Boris is beginning to get a taste of the people's lack of confidence in government. We're dosed to the eyeballs with experimental vaccine and now we want our freedom back! It's only the start of things. The 'private bubble' won't even burst until the early part of the next decade.
There's nothing like a bit of 'shock and awe', or should that be 'Blitzkreig?', to frighten the poor underlings. I suspect the shorters are scrambling out of positions while the rest of us are too stunned to even think straight. However, I'm glad to see one poster has suddenly become 'brave' overnight.
Life's a bowl of cherries - if you're a blackbird!
Hi Mr Gnome,
I haven't read the information you kindly gave links to in detail yet, so forgive me if I have misunderstood these corporate bonds so there are obligation or penalties due if selling corporate bonds during the 10 year term?
So they are really another form of managed investment funds in a number or range of companies (which may change over time) for which those managing the funds most probably charge handsome management fee's and in return they guarantee an income at the agreed rate on profits to the investor?
Seems a nice little earner for the those managing and trading the bonds with pretty mediocre returns in comparison , albeit guaranteed to the investor?
Not that no one didn’t like it. Probably the fact it wasn’t factual info,(ex. Cey in trouble if) good to see you have reflected on your numptiness and bought.
Hi Mr Gnome, Thank you for the explanation and links, in my view with inflation and the poor rate of return I can see no point in tying up money for 10 years in UK government bond's NS&I.
Some hopeful election results
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/boris-johnson-warned-dozens-of-conservative-seats-will-fall-after-stunning-lib-dem-by-election-win/ar-AALaJUa?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531
Adrian77,
Yesterday you thought Gold was going to $1700 and CEY to 80p.
Today you buy £20ks worth at 106p + ?
No I cannot manipulate the supply and demand of centamins shares. Apologies for being Frank, you clearly didn't like it.
I've just took £20ks worth, do you have an email address I can screen shot too?
Reserved and invested back into this
Anyone received it yet? Payment should have been on the 15th?
Sotolo
Don’t take the bath, the guy is clueless and pulls statements snd prices out of the air,
He’s the type of guy who never has the bottle to buy on fear of further drops.
Should he ever buy you’ll see a drastic change in his views, Im sure he thinks on his own he can manipulate the market
It's been paid a couple of days ago.
Hi Guys,
Do we expect any more dividend announcement further this year in 2021,as we already past AGM.
Thank you
Most people's concern is a falling gold price. If it falls it will be temporary, it swings all the time. And this is a great company to invest in to hedge your gold-swinging concerns. After all, they have cash in the bank, no debt, and if the gold price is unfavourable you mine it and stockpile it until the price improves. It's that simple. ( Other miners have to sell their mined gold at poor prices to cover debt and costs - CEY dosn't). Thats why I am in.
Major European indexes declined slightly in premarket trading on Friday as investors awaited economic data, including retail sales figures from the United Kingdom and Germany's producer price index.
The FTSE 100 lost 0.04% at 7:37 am CET and the DAX was down 0.07% at the same time.
The euro decreased 0.06% against the dollar to sell for 1.19004 at 7:36 am CET and the pound fell 0.18% compared to the greenback to change hands for 1.38953 at the same time.
Breaking the News / NP
Happy Friday y’al
Adrian you say DYOR. I have, and where do you get that we reach breakeven with gold $1600-1700 and are in trouble below $1700?
AISC is currently much higher than usual $1150-$1250, plus add on $200 and still $1350-1450
This should come down a fair bit within 18months
Jefferies, in Mr Tibbs post yesterday, suggests that at $1500 gold we deserve a share price of 175p
Finally the Royalty is no more than tax for many companies and is 52.5% on PROFIT so if we were to hit breakeven as you suggest it would be immaterial.
We will have a choppy time now as gold falls, as was expected and I have been criticised for expecting, but we are very well positioned to ride it out and the mid term looks very good unless gold spends long below $1500 and doesn't rise again. Unless the tumble is below $1300 for long we should ride it out and not be in trouble form how I read the figures; which ar you using Adrian? Mostly people here have an unfounded optimism but you seem to have an unfounded pessimism. I am sure our share price will overshoot on the downside but that is different to being in trouble.
you are quite wrong, lots of positives to come if you care to wait and see!
Adrian 77,
From your conclusion and statement it's clear that you don't understand the existing Sukari royalty and profit share agreement that Centamin operates to in Egypt.
indeed it is far better than you might imagine when compared to some royalty terms in other countries and further more any new concessions awards in Eygpt are on even more advantageous terms, you also need to take into account the future AISC savings that Centamin will be benefiting from before much longer.
Forget the rubbish that some of the day traders post, they poo up from time to time full of bluster and then soon disappear once they realise just haw contrarian Centamin can be!
Please take the time to read back through some of the annual reports on the Centamin home page
If you like I can repost the original Sukari royalty terms if you feel it would be of help?
Mr T
10 year government bonds are assets which mature in 10 years. What happens between now and 10 years time is dictated by the investor appetite for the 10 year bonds, which are sold on various exchange/market.
https://www.australiangovernmentbonds.gov.au/how-invest
https://www.bondexchange.com.au/invest-in-bonds-with-abx/
Personally I (and an increasing number) prefer Corproate bonds, where one can pick and chose the corporation. Some are much more reliable than governments in returning a decent ROI !?
https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/au/Documents/Economics/deloitte-au-economics-corporate-bond-report-2018-030518.pdf
cheers
the gnome
Hi Mr Gnome,
What I have difficulty understanding is the way 10years bonds are bought and sold, surely the buyer of a 10 year bond is committing to hold it for that period in return for that rate of interest?
if an ordinary individual opens/buys bonds at a bank/building society or even UK National Savings Bonds they are required to tie their money up in that bond for the full agreed period to get that rate of interest, if they close the bond early they have to pay a penalty and forfeit interest.
Yet it seems 10 year bonds are being bought and sold over more like 10 days?
Is this yet another case of one rule for the ordinary investors (Plebs)and another for those that control and manipulate the markets?
No wonder the markets are so volatile when it seems the rules under which they are supposedly regulated are open to such inconsistency and blatant irregularity, or am I missing something?
Tibbs
If you stick physical cash somewhere and come back to it decades later, it will have lost most of its purchasing power. In contrast, if you stick physical gold somewhere and come back to it decades later, chances are it will have retained most or all of its purchasing power, unless you bought right at the top of a rare gold bubble like in 1980 or 2011.
However, in any given 5-year or 10-year period, it could easily lose or gain 25%+ of its purchasing power. Additionally, gold is subject to taxes when sold, and in the physical market is usually bought at a premium to spot and sold at a discount to spot, since the middlemen need to earn a profit to make a liquid market. So, it’s not great for everyday use, unless countries decide to peg their currencies to it. It’s best used as a long-term store of value. There are debit cards that can be linked to gold accounts to make it a medium of exchange, but that introduces a trusted/centralized counterparty.
Plus, it’s risky to hold a lot of gold in self-custody due to the risk of theft. Vaulting services can safely hold larger amounts of gold, but this ironically centralizes it, and over the past century, most countries went through one or more periods of gold confiscation where vaulted gold was taken from the owner. There are very few jurisdictions in the world where someone could have vaulted gold with a third party a century ago and successfully passed it to their grandchildren, for example.
Silver and platinum are similar to gold as self-custodied stores of value, but they are more of a hybrid between currencies and commodities, and as such have lower stock-to-flow ratios and more volatility. Platinum also tends to have less liquidity and bigger frictional costs when physically bought and sold.
Overall, gold is a better long-term self-custodied asset than cash. Many wealthy people retain a small amount of it for disaster insurance.
LONG TERM YOU ARE GURANTEED THAT THE VALUE OF YOUR FIAT CURRENCY WILL GO DOWN. 100 YEARS OF EXPEREINCE HAS SHOWN THAT THIS IS ITS BEHAVIOUR AND A BEHAVIOUR BY FUNDAMENTAL DESIGN. GOLD IN THE SAME LONG TERM , SHOWS THE OPPOSITE BEHAVIOUR. PROFITABLE SUSTANINABLE GOLD MINERS, GIVES EXPOSURE TO GOLD AS A LONG TERM ASSET, AND REVENUE IN THE FORM OF FREE CASH FLOW. VERY ATTRACTIVE GOLD MINERS HAVE A LONG TERM COMMITTMENT TO SHARING THE FREE CASH FLOW WITH HTEIR SHAREHOLDERS AND STAKEHOLDERS. CEY WITH ITS VERY CONSERVATIVE BAANCE SHEET, HISTORY OF DIVIDEND PAYMENTS, HISTORY OF STAKEHOLDER PAYMENTS (EGYPTIAN GOVT) IS AND WILL BE VERY ATTRACTIVE....
Sorry for the rant, but best not to be herded and coralled by the FED which is hell bent on protecting its exhorbitant extraordinary privilege, and furthering a set of ill thought out ideologies and policies thereof.
Govts seem hell bent on revealing their lack of depth. In Oz we have a govt which is advocating that all of the people over 50 [now 60?] had to have AstraZeneca, while they all have Pfizer?
best
th
So, cash is useful as a medium of exchange and less-so as a store of value. It’s something we hold as working capital that we can usually expect to be reasonably stable a few years out (at least in developed countries), but not something that can be considered a long-term store of value outside of the financial system, and sometimes not even within the financial system.
Plus, the current iteration of fiat-only currencies is actually only about five decades old, as it became the norm in 1971. It’s a surprisingly recent system even though we take it for granted today.
And technically, cash does rely on a trusted/centralized third party (the government). It’s just that the trusted/centralized third party doesn’t need to be present for transactions to occur, and doesn’t need to hold it for you. As a bearer asset, cash can be self-custodied and exchanged with other people offline, with no direct counterparty.
Precious Metals: Pros and Cons
Gold and silver are the longest-running fungible stores of value, stretching back thousands of years on multiple continents.
Since gold is nearly chemically indestructible and can be re-melted and re-forged any number of times, it basically lasts forever. Unlike industrial commodities that are regularly consumed, gold has a high stock-to-flow ratio, meaning that its supply/demand characteristics are more like a currency than a commodity. Since it is extremely malleable, it is easy to work into standardized coins or bars. And it’s shiny and resistant to most forms of degradation, which makes it ideal for jewelry.
There was a History Channel documentary a while back called “Life After People” that visualized what would happen to the cities and stuff we left behind if humans suddenly vanished. It basically tracks the decay process until everything we built turns to ruins, crumbling and rusting away. One of the few things that would last hundreds of thousands of years without changing, would be our vaulted gold. The gold vault stored under the New York Fed, for example, would be filled with water and long-buried, but the gold bars would be the same after a bit of cleaning.
It’s hard to find big and accessible earth deposits of it, and it requires processing many tons of rock to get a tiny amount of gold, so only about 1.5%-2.0% gold is dug up each year as a percentage of the current amount that is estimated to exist above-ground. Gold has a 1.5%-2.0% average annual monetary inflation rate, in other words. This has historically been about the same rate as world population growth, so the amount of gold per capita has been pretty consistent over time.
A 1-ounce gold coin could buy you a top-notch outfit a century ago, and can buy you a top-notch outfit today. No more, no less. Based on estimates by the World Gold Council, there is only around one ounce of above-ground gold per person in the world.
Physical Cash: Pros and Cons (and lets not mention the Egyptian pound!)
Physical cash depreciates in value over time. Policymakers around the world target a positive inflation rate, often 2% or higher, and the amount of fiat currency in existence grows over time.
The word “fiat” means an authoritative declaration. Fiat currency is just paper or bits of information with no inherent value or supply caps, and thus is not something that usually self-organizes towards usage. It requires the government to mandate its use by force, which means by taxing other asset transactions, making taxes payable only in their government-issued currency, and in some cases implementing capital controls or banning competitor assets to their currency.
An exception to the rule that fiat currencies tend not to self-organize, would be that in various developing countries with particularly weak currencies, dollars or euros are sometimes traded in black markets or out in the open, and are considered a relatively hard form of money compared to the local alternatives.
An example of a developing market currency that historically has issues, is the Egyptian pound. Egyptians saw their cash savings lose half of its value against the dollar or euro practically overnight in November 2016, whether it was held in a bank or not. And that’s a country with 100 million people.
Over the past century, the strongest currencies, like the Swiss franc and US dollar, lost over 95% of their value. The average currency lost more than that, like around 98-99%. The worst currencies lost 100% of their value.
Even in a less extreme and more recent environment, the dollar lost about 40% of its value against official consumer price inflation since the year 2000.
The only way to counteract that is to hold cash with a bank to earn interest, and thus involve a counterparty. In particularly inflationary decades, the interest often isn’t enough to keep up with inflation. This chart shows T-bill interest rates minus the official CPI inflation rate since the 1930s; whenever it’s below zero it means T-bills (and by extension bank cash accounts that generally have similar rates) aren’t keeping up with inflation even when earning a yield.
And for longer-term savings instruments, here is a chart of the inflation-adjusted forward annualized rate of return of buying 10-year Treasury notes that year and holding them to maturity. You can see the three decades where bondholders got massacred, because the underlying dollars were devalued. During those times, anyone who bought Treasuries and held to maturity received annualized real returns of as low as -4% or -5% during the full duration of the note.
Cut down version of an article in Alpha
Why Gold And Bitcoin Are Popular
...few asset classes are quite as controversial as gold, bitcoin, and other alternative monies.
Since they are not cashflow-producing businesses or industrial commodities with analyzable supply and demand balances, the bull/bear gap is unusually wide when it comes to valuing things like gold or bitcoin, not just in terms of price but in terms of the very purpose for their existence as investable assets.
It was illegal for Americans to own gold for about 40 years, from the mid-1930s to the mid-1970s. In some places today, it’s illegal to own bitcoin. Governments (and economists, there I go again, sorry) sometimes find them to be dangerous. How could something so useless, also be so dangerous? Useless things rarely get banned, and instead can be safely ignored as they work their way towards oblivion over time.
The Concept of Self-Custody is Rare
There are remarkably few financial assets in the world that you can hold for a long time without trusting a centralized counterparty to hold it for you.
The vast majority of assets, like stocks and bonds and cash accounts, are held by financial institutions on your behalf or rely on centralized databases listing you as an asset owner.
Real estate is the biggest asset class that you self-custody (in a manner of speaking), but it’s not portable or liquid or fungible.
Collectibles are often a self-custodied form of asset, but they’re not very fungible or liquid, meaning that each individual unit has various quirks such as date, condition, or type that make it hard to exchange for other goods or services. The same is true for gems.
That leaves physical cash, precious metals, and cryptocurrencies as the only asset classes that can be self-custodied and traded with others without a trusted/centralized third party, while also being sufficiently liquid, fungible, and portable. In other words, they are among a small number of money-like bearer assets.
If you think about it, it’s actually really hard to invent a money-like asset that derives value from itself. If you and me want to exchange fungible value in any arbitrary amount without a third party, online or offline, there are remarkably few ways to do it. Usually we don’t particularly want to do that so it’s not a problem (we’re fine with a third-party involved, like a credit card transaction), but if we think about how we would do that if we wanted to, there are surprisingly few options.
Just about any mechanism that we can exchange value with, in a way that is liquid and fungible, requires processing/verification by a centralized third party, and that third party can spy on the transaction or block the transaction. Physical cash, precious metals, and cryptocurrencies are the exceptions, where they can be both held and transacted with outside of any centralized third party custodian or verifier.
Thanks for sharing this Mr T.
Some very interesting commentary and analysis. I like what I'm hearing about Doropo, and this does look like a worthwhile diversification of production, and increase in production to 700-750k per ounce pa. I think there is a lot more work to be done in Cote Ivoire, and far more opportunities, so getting a better footing in this country is an excellent move. Governments take a lot more notice of you when you are in production.
I get a good feeling that the production base in Egypt is in good hands , and they only need an exploration win, and this will fly.
Dips in the SP inspired by the FED's rantings and misplaced ideolgies are great buying opportunities, and I am in again.
best
the Gnome
What a last 24 hours in thed fin markets, not just for gold, but for just about anything. The Oz currency plummeted 1 per cent to as low as US75.98¢ , the US dollar surged 0.8 per cent in a move that went against the expectations many strategists had pencilled in for this year.
The comments from the Fed “had a profound impact on currency markets,” said NAB’s head of FX strategy, Ray Attrill. “We’ve had our forecasts at US80¢ for the end of the [June] quarter. That’s now being seriously challenged.” (trashed?)
A sell-off in US 10-year bonds pushed the yield up 8 basis points to 1.58 per cent while inflation expectations, as measured by breakeven rates, dropped, creating a favourable setting for the US currency.
“You had this background where many traders were short the US dollar and long the euro, and what we saw last night was the Fed conceding that economic dynamics are good enough that tapering discussions have been given the green light,” said ANZ FX strategist John Bromhead.
Powell emphasised that this was an “extraordinarily unusual time”, and emphasised that forecasts for the timing of future interest rate hikes should be taken with a “big grain of salt”. In fact taking note of what 500 or so PhD economists think has got to be a red flag at the best of times. The power bequethed to these fine brethren is frightening.
IN fact all bets on the future prices of anything would have to be with a grain of salt, except, real income producing assets?