Proposed Directors of Tirupati Graphite explain why they have requisitioned an GM. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
In a recent analysis...
Between 1995 and 2015, the share of intangible asset market value increased from 68% to 84%. In July, Ocean Tomo updated the IAMV Study to investigate the economic effects of the novel coronavirus. We find that COVID-19 has accelerated the trend of increasing IAMV share, with intangible assets now commanding over 90% of the S&P500 market value.
Translating onto the Oz ASX market, total asset value of $1.6 trillion, so the intangible asset share is $1.4 trillion. Ever seen what happens to a house of cards? Well its not all that bad. But it certainly is not all that good.
https://www.oceantomo.com/intangible-asset-market-value-study/
And the value of CEY. There are endless posts which calculate using tangible assets? But this is only the POTENTIAL tip of the ice berg! Are they undervaluingCEY by...a lot?
Suggest the value driven investor pay more attention to real assets, because when the SH@t hits the fan, you know what will get devalued.
best
the gnome
You are spot on Gnome .
Intangible assets are non monetary assets, that cannot be seen , touched or physically measured . The main examples being brand values , IPR and the excess acquisition price paid for a company , above that company's net asset value (which often includes intangible assets too, also known as goodwill ) so you can see how the pyramid of intangible asset values grow
The main industry which utilises their values on their balance sheets are giant IT companies , although many other industries do too ( exclude mining companies in that sweeping generalisation )
It probably won't surprise you to know who the top 2 companies are , who are battling it out to reign supreme.
Here are the top 4.
1. Microsoft ... $ 1.90 trillion
2. Apple .. . $ 1.87 trillion
3. Saudi Aramco ..$ 1.64 trillion ..
4... Amazon. $ 1.47 trillion
The surprise I got was with the brand name Coca Cola... Its brand value and other intangibles are just $ 30 billion ...yes quite high , but low in comparison considering how long the company has been around .
I see intangible assets as being like an elastic band ..in that you can stretch their values so far , but then the elastic band either springs right back and beyond where they started from , or it snaps !!
I don't like intangible assets ... I prefer assets I can see and kick !
Goldgnome ...in terms of whether Cey is being "undervalued by a lot". ..there is a key measure that I use which suggests that Cey is currently trading at " fire sale" prices ..
That is by looking at a peer review of how much premium the market is placing ( by its respective share price ) on the net book value of their assets . This allows us to compare Centamin with its peers in the mining sector on a like for like basis
We can also ignore intangible assets because like Centamin , all other mining companies in the review have negligible inangibles .
Here are the results in descending order.
1. Polymetal book value £2.3bn..Market Value £6.4 bn. Market premium 178% It's one year high was a 300% market premium
2. BHP.....market premium 150%.. 12 month high 212 %
3. Fresnillo...market premium 136 %... High of 270 %
4. Rio Tinto ..market premium 94 %.. high of 162 %.
5.. Ferrexpo ...market premium 41 % .. high of 124 %
6. Hoschild ...market premium 23 %...high of 138 %
So where does Centamin fit in this chart ?
7... Centamin.. 15 % !!!! premium .. 12 month high 90 %
.. just 15 months ago at a share price of £2.20 ish the market premium was 153 %
So to answer your question is Cey undervalued by a lot?
By my reckoning it is . and passes one of the 5 tests I make on a company before I decide on whether or not I invest.
I will share my other 4 tests in another post .
Thanks Candid and Gold for a really informative and helpful thread. Helps a relative novice like me.
I sit up and take notice when you guys post.
DaggerMal
Here are the 5 tests I make on a share before I decide on whether or not to invest ...They are aligned to my overall strategy of buying the share to the sound of the sirens and selling it to the fanfare of the trumpets ...it has proved successful in the past ..but not always , which is why I developed the 5 tests .. No doubt , you will have your own criteria. A share first comes into my line of vision when it is trading at or close to its 12 month low. Cey came to my attention when it was trading at £1.03 (ex div).
These are the 5 tests I performed before making the investment .
1. Is the share being shorted ...takes 2 minutes to find this out. .go to short tracker.co UK and check it out. I did , no shorts were in place. This is a key consideration..companies like World Quant, JP Morgan and Citadel etc don't short unless they believe they have the odds heavily stacked in their favour of making money , because if they get it wrong they can lose more than they invested
2. Is the company financially sound ..lots of tests here ..strong balance sheet , high ROI , peer comparison market premium on current share price , cash v debt , balance between dividends and future growth , and their impact on market premium . Cey is very profitable but 30% of its assets are in cash , which carry no market premium . Although the good thing is that they now plan to use it .
3. Why is the share at a 12 month low , are the reasons structural , market related , management competence , or exceptional such as Covid ..or a mixture
4. Conduct third party research. .(this includes joining chat boards like LSE and advfn, where people post lots of links to very pertinent topics ) What topics are being discussed that could be relevant ..do they provide any insights...this board certainly has !
5. Future prospects ...conduct tried and tested SWOT exercise as far as information held within the public domain allows.. Assess the potential for value adding activities like mergers, alliances , acquisition opportunities etc
Can I obtain longer term (10 year plans) I fielded questions on this to the Centamin Board at the retail investor event. .they went unanswered
My overall aim is to test the company and current share price almost to destruction , to identify all genuine concerns . My starting point is always why the hell do I want to invest in this share
With Cey , I didn't like the balance between dividends returned to shareholders v reinvested in the business .I think that returning $ 105 million to shareholders is too high ..although from an investor viewpoint , dividends once given can't be taken back , whereas falls in share price can.
I also think Cey lacks ambition ..I don't think it realises just how well positioned it is .(.It is literally sitting on a gold mine ! ).I do believe that the current CEO is a safe pair of hands, which they need right now, but I don't think he is the right man to take them to the next level
Ok I am do
Cheers Dagger we all have to start somewhere. ??
Yes, Thanks CI
One of the remarkable figures (and there are a few there!) is the premium for Rio. Blowing up sacred caves, blowing out the project in Mongolia, no resolution at Resolution...and so on
remarkable stuff
best
the gnome
hi Candid,
the situation with the share price is direst result of the spoofing by Andrew Pardey and Youssef El Raghy both promoted way above their mine management capabilities, complacency to the long term erm folly of their behaviour sheer arrogance in many respects towards share holders and the advice of more experienced mining professionals
Although they were both aware in 2015 of "The writing on the wall"but chose to deny it and carried on glossing over the true facts for another five years until the writing (Or crack could be denied no more)
From 2015 Kees Dekker
Management has put a gloss over this in their latest 5-year production plan, artificially holding down the strip ratio and assuming continuation of underground mining at a very high level, without having the mineral reserves to sustain this.
Should this 5-year plan be implemented, the life of the operation will be curtailed to only these five years, unless there is a major increase in the gold price.
The table below illustrates that open-pit ore is uneconomical at current mined grade at the required strip ratio and a price of US$1,200/oz. The current good financial performance of Sukari can almost fully be attributed to underground mining.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/3695246-centamin-get-out-while-going-is-good
Updated 2018 The financial performance of Centamin is highly leveraged to the gold price
with NPV5 changing by 5.5% for every percentage point change in the gold price.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4229201-kees-dekker-reviews-centamin-plc-analysis
https://seekingalpha.com/author/kees-dekker#regular_articles
Martin Horgan certainly has his work cut at Sukari and if he can get that back on an even course I think he will have achieved a far more than any of his predecessors and proven himself to be a safe pair of hands for the long term future.
We don't need any more baloney or pie in the sky,, just good honest stable and reliable production at Sukari for the time being, the rest can wait for now.