We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
(Cont... "It wasn't the product that caused the market to kill the price; it was the load of rubbish that Edelman wrote, which he later had to retract, that caused the market fall and Blinkx has still to recover from that. However, Edelman did have one benefit and that was for Blinkx to make sure its act was clean. It could not counter the "mud sticks" attack by Edelman but it has certainly done so since then with all the layers of security and product improvements it has now implemented in its products both pre and post and its focus on mobile. So, to the person who thinks I have made a huge loss, when did you last see Blinkx at 12p or anything like it? So put your brain between your ears and just look at the logic. Even today's price is still well above the 20p average that it was in 2008/2009. In the years from 2007 to today, Blinkx has rocked and rolled with the advertising, video market as it has evolved. What I like about them is they have the nous, the intellect and the products to go with the rolls and to come out with best of breed products. How many others have spent billions and failed in that? We are now in the "last man standing" scenario with these advertising products. The companies trading in the "pig swill" of programmatic of which there are hundreds and where CPMs are sold for peanuts will die deaths and will be killed by the "adblockers". Blinkx, on the other hand, is concentrating on "premium content" and that is where the real money will be made. So, lets wait until 17th November and see what the market says then. If Blinkx is on track, the losses are at least diminished or removed and the future looks bright then we can expect a good rise in the price. As for the insinuation I might be "Big Bear" in disguise, that would actually be in contravention of the rules of iii and just to put your mind at rest I am not but I do give him credit for having a level of understanding of what Blinkx is about which has obviously gone straight over the heads of the "dogs", flea bitten or otherwise, that reside on LSE." Well. There you have it. I was wrong and gdog's a bit of a fibber. He's made profit all the way. He apparently hasn't been in and out after all, despite me thinking I'd read earlier comments where he said he had. I was obcvciously mistaken and apologise with great sincerity.
Here's the response to my earlier post about sobeit and big bear just posted on iii. I thought it only fair to post his response here in his own words seeing as I made certain inferences about him/them. "When I have nothing better to do, I sometimes have a squint at LSE to see if there are any signs of intelligence there. Suffice it to say that when I went there today I found out that the flea bitten dog was still gnawing road kill over there. He has the temerity to claim that he and I had a barney back in 2009. If that was the case, which I don't remember, then it is clear from his vitriol that he lost big time. As for me, I never remember what he says or said because it is always so trivial due to his addled brain. I also note that somebody on LSE claims I have always been wrong about Blinkx and that I must have lost big time. Well, just to inform them, I bought into Blinkx when they were 12p to 14p after they had floated at 40p, staged to 60p and then fell like a stone in the region of 12p to 20p where they remained for nearly a year. People, like myself and Safari Norman were two early buyers of Blinkx shares starting back then because I believed in Mike Lynch, his philosophy and his products and how Blinkx was a product for its time. Now, how could I ever lose since even in the bad times Blinkx always traded above 12p and mainly around the 16p level and if I was to say how many I bought, it would bring tears to their eyes. And obviously when they went from 12p up to £2.30p, it would have been sheer greed and stupidity not to cash in on the way up and likewise to have bought on the way down after big drops since I have always been certain that the Edelman farce was a means of a "killing" by a paid for bit of rubbish. So, my average is still well covered at today's prices and I expect to make a big killing after 17th November when I believe the price will again start to reflect its true value." (Cont...)
I'd like to bet those were late-reported buys that took place earlier when the price was 3% down.
Filling orders. 22-Oct-15 12:33:23 27.25 355,565 Sell* 27.50 28.25 96.89k O 22-Oct-15 12:33:17 27.25 100,000 Sell* 27.25 28.25 27.25k O 22-Oct-15 12:33:06 27.25 255,565 Sell* 27.25 28.25 69.64kO
Fusty, Even a broken clock is right twice per day. Better average than Fullofit, by a huge margin.
gdog. Hopefully he gets it right one day or we are al shafted. Dr Shaggy. At least you have some hair left. I have pulled all mine out with frustration.
Ah, it was him who you were referring toas Fullofit. I thought it was. What makes me smile is how he keeps telling people that he's put them on filter, only to respond every time anyone says anything he doesn't agree with. Me, I wouldn't filter anyone, because most peole talk ****e anyway. Me included of course.:) Hope you're doing good gdog.
Hey Shag, You made me smile....I said to myself "dude's catching on". Yes, I call Sobeit "Fullofit" for a reason: He is absolutely, totally, completely full of sheet. He tells a good story, until you get to "know" him or dare say anything in which he finds offensive. I started out on good terms with the charlatan in 2009....until I wrote a post questioning something about blinkx. He laid into me with both barrels. Not being one to back down, we went at it, big time, for at least a few years. I don't bother with the phony any longer. BTW: We've had a number of blow-ups over certain issues. Never, not once, was he right. Not once.
Ironically, there's post on there called LambriniGirl who's appeared adn predicted catastophic falls in the SP on several occasions, even predicting a falldown to 12-14p a few months ago, this when we were nearly back up to 40p. An obvious de-ramper if you ever saw one. Always claims that the 'charts' areshowing it's going this way or that (usually downwards though). She/he's was predicting big falls just before the Edelman short ended, to much derision on there, followed by incredulity when the predictions came about. I read all of the comments on there and here (don't bother with ADVN, they just hurl abuse at each other), but am now canny enough not to listen to anyone who claims to be able to read the runes or claims inside techinical expertise. I just need the SP to get back up to the 90p mark so I can make an exit from this investment nightmare. I'm prepared to lose the lot, or get my money back, but I ain't got a clue were the SP is going. I suspect no one else does. My guess is a low ball buyout, but I wouldn't base investment decisons on anything anyone else, or what someone like me says. No oner knows bugger all for certain, although some appear more convincing than others It's great fun on the AIM casino, but I do wish I could get out as quickly as possible. It's all been very stressfull. My hair is much thinner than it was 2 years ago, and would like to leave with at least some of my hair intact./.
I've been reading tha good factual posts on iii since the Edelman short first began, especially the upbeat, positive posts by sobeit. and the one's from Big Bear in the last few days. Despite all these very positive, very informative and upbeat analyses I've seen the SP collapse from125p down to what it is now. I now take them all with a very big pinch of salt. Everything predicted by sobeit has gone down the toilet in in the real world of SP prices, although he claims he's constantly well in profit and awaiting the next big rise from which he'll profit again. Several posters on there reckon he's a ramper and also take his supposed 'expertise' with a pinch of salt. His posts do seem highly knowledgable, informed and very, very convincing. The diction, language, sentence structure, expertise and 'inside' knowledge of Big Bear, who's seemingly appeared in the last few days, claiming that RhythmOne and RhythmMax is the next big thing in online advertising, bears an uncanny resemblance to Sobeit himself. Some might even think they're one and the same person, but I couldn't possibly comment. Both are predicting that everything's looking so good that the next update in November will show that things are much better than the August 23rd profit warning, and that Blinkx SP is about to take off again big style. I sincerely hope for all of us that these predictions come true, but won't feel too surprised if they're don't bear fruit. This is because I've read all Sobeit's predictions before, and seen them come to nought. He claims he's in and out profiting all the way. But if he's followed his own advice, he must have lost big time. Others have. That's why I take his prophecies with a pinch of salt. Maybe this time he/they've got it right and we'll all end up very rich. After all, people can't be wrong (or right) all the time, after all I wouldn't base any investment decisions on anything Sobeit says though, because I've seen it all before, especially leading up to the catastophic falls in SP prices. I'm pretty sure our old friend on this board, Gdog, calls Sobeit 'Fullofit' or something like that. Why he might call him that, I couldn't possibly comment.
Any info that "opens up" the world of Blinky is worthwhile. Better still somebody from Blinky advising it is starting to be profitable again.
We have had many of them before. Prefer to debate about worthwhile things. I have been guilty in the past.
Just a bit sick and tired like you said Rusty.Hope all on the board are well,just reading from afar :).
Yes, like LSE BB there are some good and seemingly knowledgeable posters on iii BB that I for one have learned from. Other Forums such as ADVFN seems to have much greater proportion of Posters that just like to score childish points against each other rather than post something of value and potential interest. So pay your money and take your choice
Bloody Hell. Thanks for that. It seem that while this board is a little devoid of posts, primarily because people are probably sick and tired of seeing the share price languishing in the doldrums other forums are very well inhabited. I have heard from posters on here about some of the posters on other boards, but I prefer to look at their posts objectively. I just hope that one day it works. And by working I mean "profitable". Don't think the lse regulators will leave the link for too long.
I was going to Rusty, but the posts were so LARGE and quiet a few of them that I thought easier for us to see them on iii I know what you mean about the Desert island! Not sure if you have access to the site but incase not here is the link http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?display=discussion;code=cotn:BLNX.L If for what ever reason you cant get to it then do let me know.
Eddie21. Do you not fancy re-posting on here. It does get quite lonely at times. A bit like a desert island.
For those of you that have not been checking the iii BB in the last couple of days, there has been some good factual posts (starting with Big Bear post part 2, posted Monday 20.27). PLUS some good counter posts to balance things out.
Have to admit I am of the same ilk that these are orders that are being filled ( like now) with a share split of 27.25 to 28.25. Plenty time to fill up as these curtail the "A" TRADES. waiting game and hope they get it right.
I reckon those are just late-reported trades from earlier in the day when the price was sat around 26.25 to 26.50 for quite some time yesterday morning. The sp was slightly up on the day at that point despite far more reported sells reported than buys. I reckon those were probably the buys that that were missing. I don't think these late-reported trades really effect the price for the following day. They're just the icebergs hidden under the surface which explain why the price is up (or down) at any given point, despite the seeming discepancies between buys and sells. I might have got the wrong end of the stick as well, so please don't take this as gospel.
I hope I'm wrong, but it's just that those four large trades, about 133k looks to me as though someone's off loading again. The bid/offer price is the same but the trade price quoted is 26.49 so that might be rounded down or up tomorrow morning, but that's still lower than today's close. I hope I've got the wrong end of the stick but this share..well...its just a mystery to me these days! Anyhow, good luck with any investment you have here.
Excuse my ignorance... but why does it not look good? Thanks for explaining your thinking.
That's some trades, not looking good for tomorrow's opening price! And...before anyone starts - don't blame me.... I was out all day! Good luck folks
Trades quickly thrown in. In black. as mid-price.
Possibly one for Pensioner Do Company directors or Chief Execs have a duty to look after the interests of all shareholders. If so and they fail in that duty, what remedy do shareholders have. Regards