London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I am obviously for increasing shareholder value and would prefer buybacks to a dividend to achieve that, however, it won't do it in the short term....and I am confused as to why now in the middle of a possible takeover bid with an all share offer...we are reducing shares and possibly increasing them with the bid...any chance of some clarification anyone?
Feels like an earn out for someone, a way of realising value for the owners..... less so the small shareholders ....
2½p is not a share price with any gravitas. It's a penny stock punters' share price. So I expect we will see a share consoludation at some point. And perhaps leave TMG to drown in its debt; there may be opportnities later.
Why is nobody commenting on the revisied offer to the mission?
It was a late rns so most will have missed it. Expect some feedback tomorrow.
What's to be said...wait and see is all...
Well for starters they have upped the offer price fairly considerably, approx. 20% more so plenty to discuss if you think it is a good deal for BBSN or not? The market doesn't think this will happen eitherway as neither share has had any reaction whatsoever which is a little strange.
Well, will anyone really know if it is a good deal or not until after it is actually done? I definitely don't...
Yes, I think we can look at the offer and say whether we think BBSN or Mission shareholders are getting the better deal from this increased offer based on current company performance. Why not?
Agree with Nimrod....
It will be 3 years down the line before one can look back and say that any particular acquisition was a good deal or a Pup.
Obviously finance / price / currency all play a part in that assessment, however it largely depends on how well the present management expand their team, and up their game to drive a business that is 5 times the size of their current operation.
I am all for the "More Grist to the Mill" line of argument, but that only holds for so long, until you reach the point of having to build a new Mill!.
There is also a big question as to what will happen to the Mission Operational Management, as it is they who hold the customer relationships at present. Will the Mission Management be retained, or do they go in the first few months after completion.
As relatively small shareholders it is not our place to want to see the operational plans for integrating such an acquisition, and so to a large extent it is not a question of which group of shareholders is getting the better deal, but more a question of do you back the Green Brothers, and the CFO to ensure that they get this big fish onto the bank, and then know what to do with it once its landed.
I am also conscious of the fact that Lord Ashcroft has built a stake of c23% of the shares in this company, and to that extent I suspect that it might be him that is driving the agenda.... in which case one should do some research as to his track record in successfully integrating (or not), acquisitions in his other interests.
One doesn't know all of the facts, but to me, finances aside, this is no bolt-on. I just hope that our corporate eyes are not bigger than our tummy!.
(Six metaphors in one post!!)
Fishing Gardener
I don't disagree with what you are saying FG / Nimrod. Obviously it will be a few years until anyone can pass judgement on whether an acquisition was successfully integrated and a wise investment. But, that is the same for any acquisition for any other company. What we can assess right here and now is whether the price paid is a good deal for BBSN shareholders based on both companies current performance metrics. Does anyone have an opinion? I'll be honest and say I haven't yet done the math's but will do so and feedback my thoughts shortly. This is not an acquisition that BBSN can afford to go wrong if they go through with it.
My own opinion is that the offer should not have been upped...and those that are able can crunch the numbers JM but ultimately the deal or not will not be our decision as the only vote that will count for us is to vote with our feet and leave, or we can stay with the company and see what transpires...
Imo BBSN should have walked away and instead stayed nimble growing the company organically. Mission has a decent topline which I'm sure is what's ultimately attracted the bid, but with that comes a pretty horrific balance sheet - in contrast to BBSN's with its positive NAV and minimal borrowing.