Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Getting ratty now are you.
360phil, I don't care a hoot what you or anyone else thinks. If you don't like it either sell up or shut up.
Flipping auto fill re you're and your!!
BV, you're arrogance is getting tiresome.
Your total inability to accept the bod's poor performance, and unwavering worship of Lucan is at best embarrassing.
HITS, C because delays happen, nothing that you should concern about HITS/Tygra.
Probably both knowing him
BV here's a short and sweet question for you... with regard to the July 12th RNS that the company istest has now shown to be a total falsehood, in your opinion was George:-
a) being ridiculously naive (yet again)?
or
b) deliberately telling porkies?
He sold out and the SP went up, and that's just this stock. Not sure if it has ever invested prior to ANGs , don't care tbh.
I wouldn’t know..all green to me, lol.
Similarly take a look at the success rate of SV in making money to see why he is such a bitter de-ramper
hamsters, I find it amusing that HITS turns up after mentioning War and Peace to Tygra, they must be joined at the hip lol!
well look at the RNS's of ANGUS ENERGY and whats their success in meeting targets and then make your own mind up
DYOR as they say - Stockpickfree
We don't offer hand holding sessions, but I see you are doing ok at IGAS.
Tygra's (sadly) absolutely right with his view on Nomads. They don't (and quite possibly can't) check the veracity of company claims.
The example he cites from the July 12th RNS - "Anticipated production during Q3 comfortably exceeds the hedge amount as advised on 28 June 2022" - is a classic case in point. The only "get-out" in that repeated falsehood is the word "anticipated".
As we all know, just 17 days after the above RNS, George had to announce that actually the company couild not meet the Q3 hedged volumes, so had to beg Mercuria to allow them to shunt some of the Q3 hedge into Q1 and Q2 next year (a thing which will earn Mercuria a few million quid more, looking at future gas pricing).
But there's only one "either/or" take-out from the above repeated falsehood.
Either George genuinely did not know on July 12th that the two existing wells would not be in production within the next 17 days - if so, this shows him to persist in being jaw-droppingly naive and/or crushingly uninformed and/or serially incompetent...
Or he was stating something that he already knew would not be true.
Take your pick as to which is more likely - but frankly, neither possibility is particularly encouraging, to say the least.
I am new to this company and on the sidelines wondering whether it is worth a small punt. I came across it because it looked like it was going to blow from a TA perspective.
Can someone with history in this company refute my first impressions? That this is a company long on promises which never come to fruition? I mean I saw the tweet of the machinery and it was laughably unimpressive. Followed by a promise of an further update “this week.” Then silence.
Also is there a long history of highly dilutive cash raises? The warning sign of many a pump and dump?
I expect to get abuse from the true believers for casting doubts, but I’m doing so as a genuine matter of inquiry.
If someone can present a credible long case for this company I’m all ears. I have cash to invest and will do so if I can seen a plausible case for this being a serious, well managed and run company, which is about to produce a lot of gas.
With an obvious potential impact on the share price.
@BV. The filter is a wonderful thing. Just a sea of green today.
Just need a good update or RNS to settle things down, make the day blue and blow the naysayers away.
Tygra a simple reply will do, you are sounding like HITS with War and peace.
Oh, the complete nonsense was specific to the NOMAD checking the RNS for 'lies' etc, not aimed at you as a poster.
All the best mate.
Complete nonsense mate. The NOMAD is there to 'supposedly' ensure the communications are in adherence to the rules of listing on AIM. The NOMAD does not work for or have any staff working for the companies they represent. In the same way as accountants check and sign off what they are sent by companies, they have no idea what the companies are doing.
However, if people STILL believe a NOMAD is some sort of 'shareholder guardian' fighting injustice and bad company practice from dawn til dusk, why would they allow the following:
'Anticipated production during Q3 comfortably exceeds the hedge amount as advised on 28 June 2022.'
That is a LIE, and I can cut and paste countless examples of other LIES that the NOMAD has pre-read before release. The NOMAD is there to 'advise' on the wording contained in RNS releases, not verify what the company does operationally. If NOMADs operated in the best interests of shareholders, why do so many companies fail, and why do companies like UJO get away with forward selling billions of shares AFTER they state they are fully funded only to then dilute massively a few days later after some bloke with a social media account posted up a letter from a bucket shop broker clearly showing a book build for a dilution was underway?
Oh, and please don't confuse the 'big four' auditors with either competence or protection. They will happily sign off fraudulent accounts too (Tesco, Carillion et al).
If there's good news 'certain' people always know beforehand and buy in using delayed trades. If there's bad news they've already sold and THEN the RNS appears leaving shareholders nursing the double digit percentage losses. It's as it's always been and always will be, sometimes lowly PIs are allowed to hang on to their coat tails, sometimes we're left with the scraps. You're either 'lucky' or you're not and no amount of 'research' makes a blind bit of difference.
All the best
I wasn’t necessarily expecting a first gas rns but was atleast hoping for an update. Hopefully the only reason not to provide an update would be if first gas was imminent??? Another reason is that there is a more serious issue and they want to report it is resolved, not spooking the market. Clearly everything take a atleast three times as long as Angus expect it to so we just have to factor that in. Will first gas come? Yes. Eventually. The hedge requirements for H1 are increasing daily, but so is the forward gas price which is our one saving grace atm. Come on Angus! First has nominations update please! It’s going to be an exciting ride.
tygra forgive me if im wrong but i thought the nomad had to read and pass all RNS s. surely he wouldent pass them if lucan was lying