We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The massive column discrepancy never made sense to me... Come on there's a massive difference between 12 and 80 metres!
Even if they said 60M in the first RNS yesterday, I could ok, that's not much of a discrepancy, BUT missing 68Metres after an accurate seismic with an independent Analyst doesn't make sense tbh.
Bladey, That was my take from yesterday's rns, they know the have oil down there.
They have never said the drill was a failure. They are going to use a different sensor to see easiest way to get to it in my opinion. Let's wait for the next rns.
Honestly think this has been blown out of proportion.
No interview and no plan b for either company.
I think they will come out with something good.
Otherwise, you would think they would have tried to stop the bleed yesterday.
CVN haven't RNS'd anything aside from what we RNS'd.. Aside from an albeit early statement by them through an apparent interview... BUT that could've been before they realised the sensor issues
Would / Could explain the silence from the team.
Have the other 50% said anything? I can't keep up with all the posts and articles.
They maybe doing a new sweep using a different sensor to get an accurate display of what's down there...would explain the delay here.
"(Alliance News) - Advance Energy PLC on Wednesday said its Buffalo-10 well hit its primary target with data indicating that hydrocarbons are present.
However, an operator at the well warned of "imaging resolution issues".
Isle of Man-based Advance Energy is an upstream oil and gas firm focused on the southeast Asian nation Timor-Leste.
Buffalo-10's primary target was the Elang reservoir, which was intersected at a depth of around 3,338 metres. This was approximately 80 metres low to prognosis and outside the pre-drill range of expectations.
Advance Energy shares fell 84% to 0.75 pence each in London on Wednesday around midday.
The project operator, called Carnarvon Petroleum, said interpretation of the results show that a 12 metre gross oil column was encountered.
"Wireline logging results will be used to determine the reservoir properties (porosity, net to gross) and to confirm a net oil column," Advance Energy said.
"The information to date indicates that the seismic processing techniques employed on this project have not resolved the underlying seismic velocities or imaging resolution issues that are present in this field," it added."
Clearly not a lot of people know that............. yet!
That's what the Morning Star article says..." Issues with the Imaging sensor"
It would explain the massive discrepancy in results! Yes they could turnaround and say "We ran through corrected sensor and found closer to 80M as predicted from seismic and independent analysis"
still finding a few sellers but it seems to be turning.
i can imagine ! and I can imagine there have been some big buyers mopping up these sells. Opps the imaging resolution was wrong, we ran it again and there is indeed 50m of oil pay.
They could easily redrill a section at an angle IMO, but they need a valid seismic.
My take is that the oil is down there but they missed it.
Bladey, could you imagine haha
Could be an instant 5x bagger
"However, an operator at the well warned of "imaging resolution issues"
What does that mean... they made a mistake and there's a larger column?? Is that why they're taking so long to analyse the logs?
Can't find any interviews. This was posted on ADVFN though.. Pretax
------------
"Wireline logging results will be used to determine the reservoir properties (porosity, net to gross) and to confirm a net oil column," Advance Energy said.
"The information to date indicates that the seismic processing techniques employed on this project have not resolved the underlying seismic velocities or imaging resolution issues that are present in this field," it added.
-------------------------------------------------------
Sounds to me like they ain't finished yet!
hxxps://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/news/AN_1642595433945759500/advance-energy-shares-sink-after-early-data-warnings-over-buffalo-10.aspx
That would be good! Means somebody is confident of the proceeds of cash and this company has legs.
Bring it on.
More wells
More oil
More reward.
I think if we see some more volume... maybe
Still hovering between 0.60 and 0.67
We need to sustain a break of 0.7 IMHO
Whiff of an inbound RNS maybe...
Fishy....