Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I'll defer to your politer response kaeren.
Anyway noticed the latest bioinformatics report hasn't been posted so here it is
https://twitter.com/NovacytGroup/status/1407380082990239755
Let's hope this madness ends soon depressing......Scotland result that is we scored a goal so I had a cheer, hey ho.
Novacyt onwards and upwards see you all tomorrow.
Truimph1 , might go on for forty years and they might ask us to pay the court costs and you're the first writing Teddy bear, try harder to scaremonger.
Well, Mr Market clearly not buying into the whole maximum liability of £20m, especially when in the next sentence he goes onto say that settlement is not guaranteed. After digesting, not really much substance in that RNS. We have narrowed down the nature of the dispute from literally anything to.....literally anything. Was it the colour DSHC didn't like? Did it not work as promised? Does it link with reports made late last year re difficulty using q16 without the additional bolt on products for ease of use? Timescales? These things usually go back and forth in a sort of mediation equivalent for a couple to a few months before going legal. If parties cant resolve and it sees a courtroom, this could drag for years.
Does offering up £20m mean that this was novacyt's diddle, and in fact DSHC have a case? They do kind of imply that there is some credibility to DSHC's case by offering this, unless they want this swept under the rug asap therefore offering a relatively small olive branch which if i was GM, i would offer as this sort of thing dragging on is damaging to reputation. Its a fine line between implying guilt, and wanting a timely resolution however. Quite possible, but again, we just dont know.
Blackrocks take on lending shares to shorter's etc.
https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/publication/securities-lending-viewed-through-the-sustainability-lens.pdf
Starlight.. well said!
Some examples:
Halifax 10.10: “We will not lend or deposit by way of collateral any investments in your account to a third party”
Hargreaves A25: “Investments will not be lent to a third party and we will not borrow money against your investments.”
Barclays 13.1: “ We will not engage in stock lending for any Asset in your Account.”
I hope this is helpful.
Yep. This is another tatty old piece of LSE bulletin board nonsense. It’s up there alongside “Any bid must be at or above the highest SP in the last 12 months” etc etc.
All of the major retail platforms have explicit confirmations in their T&C’s that they don’t lend shares belonging to clients.
So the idea that you should place a limit order to prevent your shares from being lent is complete nonsense, and can be safely ignored.
The majors....don't lend or sell your shares, so Halifax, Bell, HL.. all don't
Done, limit order to sell £54 :)
Q: What can you do to prevent your shares holdings from being shorted?
A: Now what can the average personal investor do to stop their own shares being shorted, as believe me your own broker, if approached, WILL sell your own shares that they hold on your behalf as a nominee account.
There are two things you can do, the first is to certificate them but this is not obviously to everyone’s advantage but the alternative solution is simple. All you do is to phone your broker and put an order in saying that you wish to place your shares for sale at, for arguments sake, double today’s price. As they are ‘on order’ they cannot be lent out by your broker and in turn you are reducing the amount of ‘free shares’ out there that can be used for shorting purposes. And don’t forget to move your limit order up when the price starts to recover, then, that way your shares can’t be shorted – not much but helps :D.
Although an individual personal investor will not normally have enough shares to halt a concerted shorting attack, if a large number of holders did this it would reduce the overall amount of shares that they could get their hands on.
"In my opinion well worth doing if not only for the knowledge that your own shares cannot and will not be used in a short attack against the very share that you own".
https://www.contracts-for-difference.com/borrowing-lending-shares.html