George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
cb
''I’m interested in the dividend yield not how many god damn shares are in issue.''
Forward prospective yield should be about 5%.
The current investment in Lloyds shares will increase your percentage ownership of Lloyds by about 6.5% if retaining the same number of shares
O dear fakey's back with another new posting name..pmsl....how many names is that now....trying to delete the nonsense he's been posting for years....sad as f*really ....gl though....
“By that logic you would believe NatWest SP would be even higher now, if it had not repurchased £750M worth of shares and instead given that back as a special dividend?”
I agree, but Isn’t it higher though? YTD fall is way below LLOY and P/E ratio is getting on for double. NWG Div/BB split is weighted greater towards Div’s 59% vs 41%, BB, whereas LLOY’s is the polar opposite 41% vs 59%
As a retail investor, and probably a pension fund, I’m interested in the dividend yield not how many god damn shares are in issue. The buyback will only get consumed over the next few years by new internal shares anyway.
I’m no longer buying the buyback story…I’m also bye byeing the buyback topic :-)
Hopefully we see the benefits of this years buy back in 6 to 12 months
This time next year Rodney :-)
hahahahaha
I reckon a Lower opening on the FTSE 100 stocks,
A Good day for Lloyds buy back machine :-)
Belly
By that logic you would believe NatWest SP would be even higher now, if it had not repurchased £750M worth of shares and instead given that back as a special dividend?
To all the comments of "here we go again", regarding the lack of benefit form a buyback I agree. But let's take a look.
Bank Mkt Cap Buy Back Div Yield P/E Ratio YTD Performance
LLOY c£30bn £2bn 4.60% 5.77 -13%
NWG c£23bn £0.75bn 4.69% 9.63 -3%
Tell me who's split of divs/buybacks looks to be better received by the market?
Lloyd's is continually taking it up the jaxxie I'm afraid.
LTI,
I only state facts, have a look at the history of FTSE and lloyds then
Compare them with my prediction(s)/posts...
Never been pessimist in my whole life though realistic....g night all
Falk
''Waste of time, or, waste of money? or both ?''
''Buying set limit has been set....It's a matter of time before they kick off.''
''It's heart breaking to see Lloyds & FTSE are struggling
While some experts here thinks it's boom time.''
''It's heart breaking to see the at this level after all the buyback.
Have set buying limit and I hope it will kick off soon.
FTSE up ...Lloyds down''
''War in Ukraine / Inflation / Covid/ Fear/ Recession / housing market
Is on the edge........etc....The worst is yet to come.''
''Hate to be negative, sub 40p is more likely''
''The FTSE will touch sub 6500...''
''If the sp doesn't hit sub 37.5p this year then I will eat all the grass in Hydepark,''
''It will go sub 6500....The worst is yet to come.''
''I can see the Market will
Go down badly at any moment. ''
falk
''When you set your buying limits 1p, 2p or 3p below the current value
Is it doom or clever tradings? You have done it many times.''
I wouldn't set an SB order 3p or 2p below a market level, but the gap may become that on a share price rise,and i have yet to cancel the order.
How many posts of doom have I made ?
LTI,
When you set your buying limits 1p, 2p or 3p below the current value,
Is it doom or clever tradings? You have done it many times.
My buying limit is @39.5p, the sp was 41pish few days ago.
So, What is the difference between your doom and my doom?
Tbh, I am very optimistic and realistic person though the market is sitting
On the edge. On many occasions, I did call the market correctly before the big boys.
Falk
''It's ok for you to set buying limit below the current market value, but
When others do the same, you call them doomers.
Why is that ?''
What other description is there for posters predicting doom for Lloyds and the market?.
I am not predicting anything - the market determines the value of Lloyds on a daily basis, so bearing that in mind I have orders ready for if they value at a level that I am willing to take a further position at. With having very many shares I would be more than happy if the market never gave a lower valuation.
You on the other hand are loving posting doom. It would be strange if you cannot see the difference between us.
£30b m/cap - anybody who thinks they can influence market sentiment on a 2-bit investor bulletin board needs to spend more time with their Psychiatrist.
**Falk however has no shares to sell.
He is currently loving the spread of doom and gloom in the hope that he can purchase at a much lower level.**
LTI, The pot is calling the kettle...etc..
It's ok for you to set buying limit below the current market value, but
When others do the same, you call them doomers.
Why is that ?
Yes you do loser
67s
''Selling is always an option if your unhappy''
That applies to a number of people who post on here.
Falk however has no shares to sell.
He is currently loving the spread of doom and gloom in the hope that he can purchase at a much lower level.
No worries Brixton, I don't get tired of standing up to fascist scum.
Mac
No
cb
''I guarantee this share would still be the same price, or possibly even higher, if they had.''
What an absolute nonsense of a statement - the market would value the business appropriately after £2 Billion having left the business.
Oh dear Brixton, don't you ever get bored of failing to bully people? It maybe worked in high school when you were growing up in the 1950s, but I'm afraid your sad little attempts to intimidate me are wasted online.
Selling is always an option if your unhappy
**I truly think the buy backs are an entire waste of time. I truly think the buy backs are an entire waste of time. **
Waste of time, or, waste of money? or both ?
Billions of pounds has been spent for buyback.
Belly.
"I guarantee this share would still be the same price, or possibly even higher, if they had."
That might be an expensive promise but is impossible to prove. Honestly, the good thing / bad thing argument has been done to death here. People remain divided, some like yourself with quite strong conviction beliefs.
I share your frustration but the buybacks are one of the few positives for me. The other positive, its dividend, now goes out of my ISA towards my mortgage rather than being reinvested in Lloyds. I wish to hold but not increase. Paying down debt has to be prioritised at my age.
Loser God don't like you " in your own words" lol .
Mac
Tuk off off then simples
Considering there is no real way of proving empirically if they are or aren't having an affect on the SP, it just seems like an entirely pointless conversation to have repeatedly.