Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
'especially when that trouble causer possesses an IQ commensurate with his shoe size.'
To whom do you refer? You made a misplaced assumption without knowing the background to my post. At least have the gumption to apologise for it.
For context, surreyscot, who under his various guises travels from board to board attempting to ramp this share, and proclaiming anyone who doesn't do likewise is clearly 'Oilman'. I have previously suggested that I will gladly disprove him of this as I live in the neighbouring county. We can shake hands, agree to disagree, but at least he'll then know that others aside Oilman, and from other parts of the country, have a contrasting opinion on this 'company'.
He of course hasn't taken me up on that as he would rather continue as is. That's the measure of his character. I'll await your apology before gauging yours.
Ah right, so you agree that its most likely 58%? Me too. So how was my detailing that the continual stating by the company that their share of the PSC is 80% without confirming if that is 'net' (which should trigger so many other alarms) is at best disingenuous, more likely deceptive, in any way 'negative'?
Again, the facts don't suit you so you'll attempt to besmirch anyone who details them. Are you just seeking confirmation bias on this board to make you feel better?
Hi C0ckeye,
I really can’t thank you enough!
You are truly the gift that keeps on giving…..every post reconfirms your negativity which in turn amplifies my original assessment.
It’s so much more revealing than anything I could have HOPED for!!
On the matter of the 80% W.I. debate, the reason I’ve been pretty relaxed about it is that Mikey’s analysis makes sense to me.
Maybe I will look at it, but never because you want me to.
That would be a wasted effort because you place no value in my opinion.
Or anyone else’s if it sees any future for the business.
'Thanks for that most expansive response C0ckeye.
You’ve made my case for me….so much better than I ever could have myself.'
Then you'll have no problem coming back with the data on the 80% net share of the PSC then...
No Straycat, you made your case for you when you predicted a share price of £3.00 at Christmas when its £1.89 as of 31st January.
Your hope is not a method for anything, let alone investment.
Thanks for that most expansive response C0ckeye.
You’ve made my case for me….so much better than I ever could have myself.
On a more serious matter….
ayatollahblair,
I was quoting a C0ckeye post referencing you. I was using it as an example of his constant negativity.
I wasn’t impugning your opinion which only gains greater significance given your history in the region.
Apologies for the confusion.
Where did offer violence you histrionic tool? I have previously offered to meet him on the border of Hampshire and Surrey as he has continually suggested that I am either Oilman, Oilmans wife and/or based in Manchester.
Straycat, you're a perculiar one, and for one whose the son a military man, a little soft between the legs if you don't mind me saying.
You raise all these questions about the BoD and thus your investment yourself, questions as I have told you a number of times before, you are staring the answers to in the face, and yet you still deny them.
You know less about this share than 90% of those here, and for all your apparent knowledge of corporate governance before Christmas and your excitable, and numerous, proclamations of what certain share transactions meant, nothing came to pass. I wasn't surprised.
What did surprise me is, for all your assumptions and insight how flummoxed you seemed to be when I asked you how best to reach out Jaap and his incommunicado, whose integrity both you and I call into question. I would have thought someone who had such intimate corporate knowledge would have known other routes for shareholders, yet you're suggesting that my pointing out to someone to contact Celicourt, as I have, is a negative? Have you not done that yourself then?
You seem devoid of knowledge of the geopolitics of the ME and seem to believe that all protagonists there will eventually act in a way that suits your investment. That they will come to their senses and eventually think like you. If they do, can you counter my point on the HCL and explain to us why, since its initial inclusion in the Iraqi constitution 17 years ago, it hasn't then been signed.
Also, can you clearly demonstrate where in the PSC it shows GKP hold 80% *net*, and if they do why is it, that the company refuse to confirm that is the case. Once again, the key word, especially for our investments is 'net'.
I made these predictions before, and with the share price at 189p, I'll make them again. Despite the Q3 target to hit 55k, - which is almost certain to push again - the share price will not correct itself and will languish around the 250p mark. And it is this point which you seem to demand we base our positivity upon, when all else has failed?
My thoughts here are based on experience. Yours are based on hope. I understand what I'm involved in. It's time you and your positivity did too.
All the very best to you, and it.
That's why it's called Kockeye..
One big ****festival.
"Genel received their Sept payment yesterday"
The rns is dated today 7am..... so wrong again!!
But doesnt matter as long as the payments are coming thu.
Genel received their Sept payment yesterday
SC I assume you are aware that ****eye is related to the Car Parts Salesman over on ADVFN ?
While I’m all for a dose of reality on this bb, sometimes I wonder as to the posting intentions of some of the contributors.
This a week’s worth of C0ckeye’s latest postings….no positive posts to be seen anywhere. Nor any positive sentiment.
‘ayatollah knows. If there hasn’t been a HCL before now, there’s a reason for that, and that is – there isn’t going to be one.’
‘There’s never going to be a HCL law, because the absence of one suits both parties and their sectarian scaremongering, but still, I’m not here to be popular.:)’
‘Then your investment and everyone else’s is in a lot of trouble.’
‘Because he’s a liar?’
‘Well said, AntonDec. Anyone who thinks this isn’t the way it’s going to pan out, when, or if, it eventually pans out, is off their rocker….’
‘Does the retired surreyscott and his “30 years” in the industry really have that long for his investment here to be realised? Do any of us?’
‘Anyone want to start taking odds on that?’
‘So in this much mooted scenario, the company isn’t doing that acquirer any favours. Or themselves for that matter. Or us.’
‘Thank you, Mikey. Another glaring example of how the likes of the ‘Big Bear’ know so little about the company they’re invested in. They’d rather listen to the likes of Surreyscot. lol.’
‘ElBigBear, why don’t you call the company and/or Cell Court Comms to ask them to clarify the situation? I did.’
‘The company refuses to confirm whether they have 80% interest in the PSC which would strong suggests they don’t.’
Why would anyone post incessantly about the negative aspects of investing in this share when it can only damage their own shareholding?
The less generous among us might think you were working to an entirely different agenda….
can someone translate please
No ... c 0ck off back to 3 lies
Aww . . . is baby upset
BLESS
ayatollah knows. If there hasn't been a HCL before now, there's a reason for that, and that is - there isn't going to be one.
can someone translate please
No ... c 0ck off back to 3 lies
can someone translate please
If your cooking matches your syntax d0dger, I won't excepting any of your dinner invites, that's for sure! lo
Pmsl soz... i spotted it the wrong hear... should of been here!..... c'mon wots a bit of burnt edges... it adds to the taste.... ; )
If your cooking matches your syntax d0dger, I won't excepting any of your dinner invites, that's for sure! lol
There is never going to be a HCL law, because the absence of one suits both parties and their sectarian scapegoating, but still, I'm not here to be popular. ;)
"I think it will happen once HCL is done. "
'Then your investment and everyone else's is in a lot of trouble.'
Really not ur investment then ****eye?.... oh no of course not ur not invested r u!!....just hear to keep the negativity going!... bet u dont get many dinner invites...ur a right bundle of laughs...x
"I think it will happen once HCL is done. "
Then your investment and everyone else's is in a lot of trouble.
As I said already the timing Re cancellation is a matter of good judgement . I think it will happen once HCL is done. Then KRG income is much more defined and GKP will be looking much more secure. Game of poker ATM.
Rightmove have just initiated a two month repurchase programme offering the shareholders a 5% premium against a predetermined average share price to buy back their shares.
Similarly last year RRE got so p1ssed off with their market valuation that they offered a similar deal to their shareholders for cancellation at a 20% premium.
Share buy back shouldn’t be used as a defence mechanism against that Nasty Old Market view of GKP.
Putting the bought back shares in a safe place, away from harm, instils confidence in no one.
We should be taking a much more aggressive stance, putting our belief and confidence in our own brand and buying back for cancellation using our own surplus funds to do it, ahead of dividends.
What better message to send the markets about our conviction and determination to see the true value of the proposition tested in the open market than by buying for cancellation ourselves?
No balls.
IMO.
'If Jaap Huijskes was so adamant in his Chairman's letter that any shares not required for the vesting of staff share option plans would be cancelled, then how come they're still being bought back into treasury?'
Because he's a liar?