Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
@wildtiger
How does the AI know whether Acacia is going to stump up the £3m it owes or whatever else BMN hasn't told the market?
He's probably still buying HZM.
No you don't, you just buy when shares you follow hit 52 week lows and have got lucky enough times to think what you have is a well defined strategy.
Loading up before the next bit of news is very risky.
We use a number of custom built AI tools for stocks and success rate is over 80% so far. Cant really go into the details as we have a few clients paying over 6 figures per year for the infos
I'd be interested to your rationale for buying BMN at this point. You'd get better odds playing a fruit machine.
Bought another 2m shares since yesterday, thank you sellers!
Fortune wouldn't call it aim crap .
Built himself a nice new house and top school fees on the back of six years of declining share price
Lol
Get the feeling the next RNS will say closure of operations. BMN cannot survive these prices and will be broken up, sold off and delisted.
Sub 1p approaching, probably this week by the looks of things. Another piece of AIM cr*p......
Its what you left off the calculation that was dim .. but as you say .. each to their own
Dim figures, made up? Figures lifted straight from the director's report. I think you'll find the "other folk" were laughing at you Faramog, but each to their own.
No TB .. you didn't ... I just laughed privately with some other folk about your dim figures and what you missed, assumed and frankly made up ... but each to their own .. and no .. I won't be sharing ...
Keep up the entertainment though ... I am so depressed ... its all failing ... we are doomed ...
In the end .. we are past a certain point .. either CC has done enough and it flies .. or everyone looses their shirts .. go sell .. hold .. just stop whining about it
Awwww ... bless ..
meanwhile .. should not be long. Last years Q1 was 27th April (so next thur maybe)
Faramog, far from a broken record I think I taught you something last week!
faramog
Posts: 7,496
Price: 1.175
No Opinion
RE: Bottom Drawer11 Apr 2024 11:18
Well @TB .. lets see your calculation for $40 AI costs then ... because I don't recall that ever being the case
TrevorBrooking
Posts: 1,062
Price: 1.175
No Opinion
RE: Bottom Drawer11 Apr 2024 11:46
Just for further clarity Faramog, if you read the Finance Directors report in the Dec 22 stat accounts (last available) you will see that all in sustainable costs were $43.7. Yes, the business is slightly different now, but not that much so I believe $40 is a very reasonable assumption.
I’d rather listen to a broken record than the aforementioned 5 brain cell list.
You say nothing new .... it has been clear to even those with only 5 brain cells that the situation is poor and requires Vanadium pricing to rise .... you are just a broken record
Faramog, when people post misleading comments like "Are we bovvered , given the prospects get brighter all the time" I like to present a more realistic future scenario, given that potential investors may be reading this . The prospects have never been worse in my opinion. I fully accept that everyone has their own opinion but lets consider all possible outcomes!
In for a Pound. Oh the irony
Why are you here TB ? .... all you do is moan
KN
As so many have previously posted over the past 18 months, you really should be 'bovvered'.
The problem is Lithium technology is still improving rapidly (if CATL's claims are to be taken at face value).
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/catl-unveils-tener-the-world-s-first-five-year-zero-degradation-energy-storage-system-with-6-25mwh-capacity-1033251119
Knutsford, you should be "bovvered", very bovvered. V pricing is showing no signs of recovery, quite the opposite in fact. How long can the company continue to operate for before the funding runs out? What will come first, an rise in V pricing that makes production economically viable, or administration/buy out? A pure gamble with the odds stacked against you at the moment.
Been below 1p before and then rose dramatically. Are we bovvered , given the prospects get brighter all the time . The lithium battery chickens will be coming home to roost quite soon and those installations will more clearly be seen as only cheap short term but expensive long term as compared to VRFBs-i hope
KN
It is moving....down to sub 1p by the looks of it
Two trades totalling circa 30 quid at 1.0p .. talk about being walked down !!!