If you would like to ask our webinar guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund a question please submit them here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ocelot. If you don't look both ways you might get hit by a truck,no if's or buts.
your scenario posted on 24 feb saying GL was going to talk BS. Your post saying your not at a loss, and in another saying the SP will hit 2p My imaginary scenario is that you bail at your 2p exit,and never heard of again.
AAAG are too busy making imaginary scenarios . Unbelievable
Simply not interested in such "ifs", balancedviewer.
Ocelot. I'm asking if you was in business with someone personally which you already know. But nicely swerved, I guess your a politician, and if not your certainly wasted.
Haven't answered your questions, balancedviewer, because I haven't understood why you are asking me, but I will say this re:
1/ the answer will be provided by the councillors on 02/03;
2/ the question should be put to the relevant business partner.
Ocelot. You conveniently don't reply to the questions that i have asked you,it's obvious you have no answer and edit accordingly.
1/ If a councillor up for may elections which way would you vote.
2/If your business partner wasn't keeping you up to date about developments,but issued an RNS as a last resort. Answers on a postcard please.
"Those who feel Angus should be watched like a hawk are unlikely to become new investors in Angus."
That made me chuckle. The reverse of that presumably is that "it's only those who are merely prepared to take a casual glance that are likely to become investors in Angus"?
I'm also interested at this moral high ground that Ress amongst others is trying to claim for himself when he cries "but to try and lose the average man his money is just a low thing to do!! And theses people have done nothing to you neither!!" That's extremely shaky to me.
So Ress, if one is invested here but thinks the company really is not covering itself in glory or being managed at all well (as describes more than a few here), what's the moral thing to do? To keep consistently singing the company's praises regardless, in the hope that some new less informed investors will come along and be attracted into buying into a company that you believe is unfortunately suspect, so you can bail out? Or to say nothing despite your own beliefs, but in pretty much the same hope?
Neither policy sounds too morally upright to me... more like a game of "pass the parcel bomb". Probably best then that you let people express their opinions as they wish, rather than attempting to play the sanctimonious card, no?
I'm sure any new investors will be watching Angus like a hawk.
----------------
Somewhat illogical thing to say.
Those who feel Angus should be watched like a hawk are unlikely to become new investors in Angus.
ress2003, I completely agree with your points and most of those posters appear on red days, just to add fuel to the fire. I am a LTH and admit to being frustrated by the delays, however the past 12 months has been challenging in a number of ways for alot of people. I keep on reminding myself about the investor taking 10%, the recent fundraise for £1.5m @ 1.0p and the fact that Shell have signed up to take capacity. On top of this the price of the Gas has increased. Of course it would be great to have everything working on time and to schedule, however the vast majority of companies on AIM hit snags and delays. I am a LTH and believe that the value will eventually be reflected in the SP and will hold until it does and add on any weakness such as today. GLA and have a great weekend.
They knew the well wasn't going to plan for a while. Ocelot, if your business partner didn't let you know what was happening would you be pleased. I'm sure any new investors will be watching Angus like a hawk.
That was because of the rush to get the RNS out immediately.
ress. It took Angus a while to tell the partners when Brockham failed.
Yan. I'm sure new holders got spiked and watched their investment tumble. They're probably looking for an exit asap.
Something I can’t get my head around is all theses negative posts about the company being posted is why you all spend so much time on this forum??, for who’s benefit is it for?? Is it to stop people buying in??, or to persuade share holders to sell by putting doubts in there minds??, because that is what your doing!!, what I don’t get tho is this is people’s hard earned money they are investing!!, and if AAAG have a issue with the company that’s fine but to try and lose the average man his money is just a low thing to do!! And theses people have done nothing to you neither!!,
On another note have many of the people who post nothing but negativity!!, drive cars??, use planes to go aboard?? Have a TV??, laptop’s??, the lest goes on!! Yet will have a issue with a oil company at the same time!!, it beggars belief!!, and in the future I can see angs being a green company and moving away from oil gas,,
I asked in a different message the other day,, do you honestly think someone would buy up to 10% of this company for no reason or do you think GL has led him up a garden path?? Honest answers??,
Yesterday interview GL mentioned the solicitor are involved with the paper work send of things for the finance deal,, do you honest think he’s lied about that??,
And as for the share dropping I put that down to the delay in the finance deal,, am sure some brought in thinking it would be completed in February but now realise it could be end of March and moved there money else where till later March time,, and of cause all the bashing of this company isn’t going to help the share price neither!!,
Another correction ... now,
Bid 0.80p - Ask 0.85p
0.6p is in sight again!
I don’t know how any long term holder will not get infuriated with this.
gk. don't worry, the Bod will put their hand in their pockets to show good faith, so no more shares will be issued.
1/ answers to Investor Questions
2/ 02/03: Balcombe planning meeting decision
3/ 04/03: webinar
4/ soon, annual accounts for the year ending 30/09/20
My personal view is that the market as a whole is asking itself why that decidedly odd "Investor Presentation" document was released by ANGS and why its content suddenly additionally referenced a swathe of either resurrected or brand new projects, rather than focussing exclusively on the Saltfleetby self-alleged jewel in the crown, where logic would dictate the company should be putting all its efforts, resources and the cash that it hasn't got yet. I don't think this will have gone down well.
Compounding that question would be a further one - namely, why George chose right now to pay for a classic Malcy powder-puff love-in session, with him being lobbed a number of ludicrously easy soft balls to take a swing at. That won't have gone down well either.
There's a very justifiable school of thought that would say the company is attempting to puff itself up well beyond the bounds of reality - and such activities most often tend to shortly precede an effort to raise short-term cash to keep the lights on a little longer.
Not that I am entirely of that mind. Despite ANGS's still ongoing perilous lack of cash, it would be hard to believe that the BoD would have the gall to seek any short-term smaller fundraising routes so soon after the last surprise one. However, to the more casual viewer, that may well be exactly what looks like is going on.
Yan. Yes the markets are moving with there feet. I recall 1 poster saying there wouldn't be any sells under 1p. We all live, but some never learn.
The people selling now must be desperate for the money. There was ample time to sell at a higher price.
Sorry ... correction ... the bid is at 0.8p now.
The SP is tanking.
Currently, Bid 0.85p Ask 0.90p
The market did not like his presentation nor his Macy’s interview and the SP is crushing.
To be honest, I never thought we will see these SP levels again after we hit a 52-week high (1.55p) exactly a month ago.
This is unforgivable. GL has to stop the jam tomorrow talk and close the effing funding deal. No excuses, period.
I hope this is made clear to him by all investors.