We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Bobby, the research does pan out if you dig deeper than what has been stated here by Hull and Giles, it's now a matter of accuracy, the research is after all speculation but if Hull and Giles communications with GS are accurate then it has merit. My own research wasnt as recent pr as detailed over recent events but a bit of digging today shows some overlaps in mine and Giles and Hull research. Theres definitely credibility on the research and it's now down to the company
I still don’t see the link to the research being posted?
Looked at the network on corporatewiki’s and can’t see anything overly interesting, although may be missing something.
I think news will come out soon as I have spoken to Gobind and he did say ‘first half of July’.
What market impacting news this will be....?
I’m not even going to pretend to know. It obviously wouldn’t be right for me to know and if information had been found out and the company had confirmed it, then they would have had to announce it to ensure they limited the chance of anyone falling foul of 1.3 of the market abuse regs.
Obviously quite a roller coaster today on the shareprice, everyone just needs to remember that the only news that matters is the news announced by the company.
Everything else is just conjecture from random internet peeps.
Not trying to be down on this - I’ve just seen lots of crap being discussed on here which I know to be factually incorrect and I don’t want people to lose money by thinking everyone on here is :
A) knowledgeable; and
B) playing with a straight bat.
So... I definitely wouldn’t bet against positive news soon, however, I definitely wouldn’t rely some of the messages here.
Tomorrow could be the last chance to buy in sub 3p!!! :) (one day, this message will be correct - it’s said every couple of days - hope I get a prize for being the one to correctly ‘call’ it)
I’m with Giles. Leave it on a positive “feeling” and let GS release the details when they’re ready.
Not long to wait now surely.
At least it’s easy to see what’s on your mind Giles :)
LOL sorry Bobby, just noticed that I did it AGAIN. Probably says more about me than you :)
Funny!
I’m still hopeful - even a broken watch it right twice a day..
Like I said I decided to leave it to GS to explain.
Hi Giles, thanks for the feedback. I guess what many want to know is what is the link referenced to Lido to substantiate the views posted earlier by Hull. Where can this be found? Thanks
Care to share the Lido link Giles?
Thanks
Very very odd day.......it should all come out in the wash I suppose
@BoobyAxlerod: No, I don't find it strange but then I also found the link to Lido Advisors. I also checked with GS who told me that it would all be explained in the update. I decided to leave it there and let him explain in case I didn't have the 100% full picture.
Hull - Are you going to share the source?
No one else think it’s very odd?
14:28:27 2.50 1,200,000 30.00k O
16:28:00 2.39 122,549 2,929 O
16:26:11 2.39 25,000 597.50 O
1,200,000 traded at 2.50 earlier today!
Bots in reference to my last comment i agree with you comments but it seems apparent (when considering others posting comments recently) some people have had cash invested in this a long time, at higher levels and perhaps not averaged down or been unable to do so. Therefore some were clearly underwater and given the lack of deals being confirmed in recent months and only the constant speculation the recent rise rise might have led some to move on into the next dead cert. Their choice and only my thoughts to offer another explanation to some selling recently. Hopefully this will march on and we get some deals over the line at last.
People cutting losses and taking advantage of sp rising on unsubstantiated rumours from a random person on the internet?
Just a guess.
Why hold a stock when it’s losing and sell when it’s winning? I don’t get it
Hopefully Raaydar, strong am then the price came off. Perhaps some selling due to de-risking as i think from some comments over time many have been underwater from 4.5 and below so 2.5 possible breakeven for some. Just a thought. Hopefully positive news soon and we can move higher.
Looks to me like a large order is being filled
Hull - If you post up where this publicly available information is then we can take a look.
Apologies if I’ve missed it. Would be good to see.
It’s obviously market moving so strange there isn’t an RNS.
Thanks
Bobby