We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Martini,
Think many have formed similar view BUT you summarised so eloquently.
I am content BUT also patient.
And SLIM provided the capital not ALGW
Anyway the "fund " does not belong to ALGW. It is a LP in the Cayman Islands with ALGW and SLIM as joint general partners according to submissions to the SEC
Why is Alpha the primary partner when Blackoak Growth Fund was SLIM's product?
"Alpha's fee structure" Alpha being the primary partner and getting the 60%. The fund is ALGWs, SLIM are the junior partner. Linguistically and sematically it reads exactly that way
From the brochure "Alpha’s Fee Structure 1.5% Management Fee, split 60/40 with partner"
That does not say in favour of ALGW, in fact it reads 60% to the partner (SLIM) , surely?
Is Daisy Signal Man on twitter?
Their vocabulary and commentary are remarkably similar. Also similar to that of Share22k could it be possible that all 3 are one and the same? Highly likely. A sole dissenting voice on the internet, seeking out likes and recommendations to feel valued in spite of their lonely existence, a cat and a laptop keep them company on the long dark winter nights. In the summer dreams of BBQs with friends they wished they had. Friday nights alone watching reruns of Brideshead Revisted, a bottle of Lambrini and dinner out of tin foil take away containers, dreaming of as many different ways possible to say the same thing about a company, never truly understanding what is actually true. Destined to be alone, alone, alone.....
Daisy I try to state facts, positive and negative not just moan which leads precisely nowhere. Once again you fail to answer a simple question put to you. If someone reads the brochure likes what they see and choose to invest that is their choice and a positive endorsement of a growing business. That is one of the objectives of that document.
I'm not a fortune teller but I have put my money where my mouth is and if we have $2bn AUM we won't be sub 2p (quote me in the future on this) as by that stage the multiple acquisitions, organic growth, AUM and revenues will be clear to see.
It is clear you have an agenda to discredit and repeat your one-sided view of the company time and again without looking forward or acknowledging the progress that has been made. I'm under no illusions here but if you were still invested you wouldn't make every effort to try and lose yourself money every time you type.
An additional 10% share of revenues will clearly make a positive contribution to the bottom line overtime on a fund that is growing AUM. You are probably the only person unhappy with getting an extra 10% of the revenue for the BOAGF which is most odd.
A difference of 10% in ALGW`s favour will not make a blind bit of difference to the revenue.
As for my statement-how does YOUR positivity help the share price?
It doesn`t.
Exactly.
I am stating facts that the share price has gone nowhere over the last four years no matter how much AUM has been added.
How do you know the share price will increase when we supposedly hit $2 billion?
Daisy your first line 'there is nothing new for in the brochure as far as existing investors go'. This is factually incorrect. You might want refer to the new revenue split for the BOAGF is now 60/40 in our favour detailed in the brochure. Previously this was 50/50. Just an example. The fact is the brochure is meant to educate new and existing shareholders.
You are happy to sit and tell me what I haven't said and then make general statements that are factually floored out of ignorance. Perhaps you can provide a response to my question put to you in my last msg 'If you still hold shares how does your negativity help your shares increase in value in the future?
You lack credibility.
All wrong
I am not on twitter and I am not Share 22
Dream on..
Daisy, SignalMan, Share22k. One bitter man with an agenda.
Sad really. What a way to spend a life.
Anyway… back to Alpha and us all making good money here over the coming months and years.
Is Daisy Signal man on twitter?
Not yet.
We are still under 2p, where we were four years ago,
Now entering Q3, expecting the latest acquisition to be signed off in this period as stated by the company. They are looking at opportunities to add more acquisitions without the need for raising, the wheels are turning adding more revenue to the company, should be a very fruitful journey from here, the change of strategy seems to be paying off.
I see Raaydaar has resorted to ramping this on the other board.
Rambo, there is nothing new for in the brochure as far as existing investors go.
As for selling at 8p, I think the shares briefly touched that area and came down as fast as they went up.
They have not been anywhere near that since nor do they look likely to.
You can go on about growth and AUM all you want but the fact is that the SP is not moving and nobody is buying.
Daisy more nonsense....where have I said and keep saying it is uncorrelated? I don't believe I have used those words myself this year so at least be accurate if you are quoting someone.
If you can't or won't acknowledge our significant AUM growth over the last 2 years which is a matter of fact why are you still a 'shareholder'? You had the opportunity to sell at 8p like everyone else (as reminded previously) and you didn't so all you have to do is take responsibility for that decision. If you still hold shares how does your negativity help your shares increase in value in the future?
The good news for clarity on page four Re BOAGF of the brochure it states 'Life settlements provide investors a good opportunity to invest in an asset class which is not correlated to the stock or housing markets'.
The brochure was created to inform new and current investors on the business strategy and progress so I recommend you read it.
It always puzzles me when people ask that question.
Yes I am and even if I was not I am still permitted to make comments on shares I do not own or even want to own.
Putin has not taken over the UK yet, we are still entitled to free speech.
If you are bored with what I have to say, put me on filter.
Steve, I suggest you go to bed earlier if you are tired and catch up on your beauty sleep
I'm not tired just bored of your constant negativity. Are you still invested?
So you keep saying Rambo, but you also keep saying that we are uncorrelated and enthuse about how much AUM we have and how the market will wake up.
The happy clappers on here have all been wrong for the last four years.
We are not the best kept secret at all- we are being avoided.
Steve, I suggest you go to bed earlier if you are tired and catch up on your beauty sleep
Daisy your constant complaining does nothing for anyone as per usual. You fail to provide a balanced debate and even acknowledge the positive steps the company are taking when they take them. This brochure will help educate new and current investors about the business and critically how they grow AUM and revenues which are growing quickly. That is a fact. The SP will take care of itself in time. You may have noticed the wider market has sold off big time in H1 for a variety of reasons and no share has been unaffected by these headwinds but that will change at some point.
Yawn.......So you keep saying....... big stretch.....another yawn.
Brochure out and no great shakes. Same repetitive rubbish.
Notice the heavy buying-not.
Share price says it all.
Bottom drawer for this
A great brochure out today clearly explaining what the company does and how it generates AUM and revenues. Ideal for new and existing shareholders.
Did anyone else notice the BOAGF fee structure split with the partner on page 5? It used to be 50/50 split but now it is 60/40 in our favour. More revenue for Alpha. Excellent news. BOAGF also benefits from a 20% performance fee above 7% hurdle rate. This will be a very important source of revenue as the fund grows and the performance realised.
Daniel Gray being an operating partner at Blackrock not to be under estimated given his wealth of experience and contacts in the industry.
Excellent work. Next up 300m AUM added upon acquisition completion due anytime.