Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Actually, it wasn't last night it was one of those recorded programmes.
Anyone watch that Trump programme last night. Jesus wept!
Yes, it's an interesting argument and it was wage slavery until about 100 years ago, wage slavery vs the liberty to starve to death. Then there's the dilemma of Rights, whose Rights; my Dad used to say the trouble was always that other people had them.
Yes, it's an interesting argument and it was wage slavery until about 100 years ago, wage slavery vs the liberty to starve to death. Then there's the dilemma of Rights, whose Rights; my Dad used to say the trouble was always that other people had them.
While we're at it Suzy, let's not forget that quite apart from by the more recent Vikings and saxons, English people were also enslaved by other english people just a few hundred years ago. Its called serfdom, but slavery by any other name
I agree aug59... KB has been professional throughout this process, particularly as our reputation was in tatters towards the end of CSP’s tenure... He is keeping his powder dry
topsharepicks. No, I am not saying that he is being negligent. I’m saying that the independent report clearly states that the process has failed BEM, and that KB has an obligation to ensure that those failings are addressed, timely. His comment ... “it's not a matter for UNESCO” was a signal of intent, should that be necessary. Imo only. atb
aug59 absolutely spot on with that assessment I was only thinking this a few days ago KB has been negligent the way he has handled this with that regard
Pocko, the KU report changes everything, because, we are in exactly the same position today, as we were when the report was published. In light of the report, with the failing of the Government, KB has a duty of care to the Company and its investors to bring about changes to address those failings. Following the report, KB did not seek assurances from Baylan in respect of necessary changes, it would have been reasonable for him to do so, but as we know, he appears to be someone who does hard-talk in private. If we are subjected to further, unreasonable delay, then KB has a legal obligation (imo) to make input in an attempt to make those changes happen. Today, Baylan is hiding behind UNESCO, should that continue, then KB has to seek those changes from upstairs, with the option, Baylan must change, or he must call for Baylan to go. Enough is enough! All in my opinion of course. atb
You make a very topical point Treetop...English people were enslaved in Rome in the 1st Century and this question of ethnicity is ridiculous. I can understand it if an interloping nation comes across a people who are not in tune with modern times, an unknown tribe in the rain forest, who couldn't possibly be expected to get up to speed in one generation, they need protection...otherwise the thing is a total can of worms. Nobody lived in Northern Europe until after the last ice melted, we're all ethnic.
We have followed established channels Treetop... unfortunately the Government hasn’t. If UNESCO don’t do their job, the law and it’s application might be our only card left to play.
Perhaps we are doing it all wrong following established (?) channels of approval. We might take a lesson from our younger generation and pull a few swedish statues down for enslaving our anglo saxon ancestors in the 10th century and cancel Volvo and Abba music in our media !
Time will tell... It’s more ambiguity that worries me. I just don’t see where the government can take this once they have a response from UBESCO. Legally it must be a ‘yes’... but experience tells us otherwise...
Afternoon. Exactly Pocko. This should be all straight forward, as it would be a matter of record. When UNESCO/others considered the positioning of the boundary (buffer zone), there must have been a consultation period. Given, the presence of iron ore at Kallak has been known since the 1940’s, it’s then reasonable to assume that those representing the Sami would have made written input with any suggestions/requests etc, and therefore UNESCO must have addressed any. We know how that should have read, as the MI did then issue exploration permits for Kallak, and if, the Sami did not make any representation during the consultation, then that speaks for itself. Imo only. atb
Unfortunately, ambiguity helps keep politicians in a job... keeps them ‘busy’ and justifies their ‘job’. Likewise with UNESCO. It’s a merry-go-round...
Another fishy comment TSP? And you don't have to shout. One thing certain is that the Department of Industry and Enterprise are under scrutiny and the MPs who have taken an interest in this will be as keen to get the response from UNESCO as we are.
sadly I think they'll all be rubbing their hands with glee................ an organization like UNESCO loves it when a government asks their opinion.
They'll be asking their independent professors and scientists to evaluate this till the cows come home.
It should be clear cut but oh no................................... 1 year imo
KURT IS FLOUNDERING
How long could it possibly take for a 5-person team to review the information provided by the Swedish Government? Information presumably only relevant to any potential impact on Laponia. That of course depends upon the question(s) asked...
Based on what we know, and the distance between Kallak and Laponia, the answer should be an easy one - ‘Its not in our remit’.
Likewise, from previous behaviour, ambiguous questions will have been asked, and an equally vague, ambiguous and non-committal response will no doubt be received from UNESCO...
Hi eric. Sorry but jokes are never as funny if you have to explain them lol
...I find it odd that Sweden even offer exploration licenses when there’s no way to take it beyond...companies really ought to be boycotting any further investment in this country...
I know there are positive posts about the hurdles being removed but why would UNESCO bother replying to a letter from a Sweden? This could remain in limbo indefinitely and I’m amazing that the 70% Swedish shareholders are twiddling their thumbs. BEM and UK investors stand no chance of impacting on this...there are no timelines that UNESCO are bound by. I’m guessing that the only way this will change is through a new government that has an agenda to develop the economy...
Spider crabs are ace. Not easy on the eye but they have their place.
Plaice. Lol.
I didn't watch much of it because I had to go out. Nalfaren said:
"There were a lot of good speeches from e.g. Helena (M) who brought up Kallak, Laver, KU and more ...
The MPs in the Chamber were: Mattias Jonsson (S) Helena Antoni (M) Eric Palmqvist (SD) and Camilla Brodin (KD)
If the link doesn't work for you it's because you need to put s l a g in place of the **** .
Everybody just waiting on a decision. Sure there are other strings to the bow now, But Kallak is the price
Which would be great news, were we to actually undertake any exploration. (I appreciate the drilling program was/is delayed) What year did we last do any drilling? Has there been any creation value in the last 7-8 years? None recognised in the SP that’s for sure...
Because of Covid...thanks Nalfaren:
https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/webb-tv/video/debatt-om-for****/undersokningstillstand_H801NU9