If you would like to ask our webinar guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund a question please submit them here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Indrid what sources are you using???
for what you moron? for Finland joining NATO? or open sources like Oryx cataloguing materiel losses, for open source mapping for territorial control shifts?
4. Nato ARE fully committed
You sound like a fascist nut
Man you're nuts. Advancing??? Ha ha ha christ
"4. Needle are fully involved and completely committed and they are losing at all levels"
......lol, what?
5. All experts agree it is only the West who would be mad enough to use nuclear weapons Russia have stated categorically they will only respond the west changed their own laws to allow them to preemptively strike. The west are losing and therefore they are the ones we are in danger of using nuclear weapons. Russia has developed hypersonic which puts them ahead in the arms race for quite a while. All military experts know that the West have no answer to this currently.
another bare faced lie, the west (and even China) have categorcaiily told Russia they can not use nuclear weapons after threatening to use them on a daily basis
no experts have said anything of the sort, if so provide proof
A Kinzal was shot down by a Patriot, so why on earth are you lying again?
Thanks for your shares, I've started a position here this afternoon.
Indrid what sources are you using???
"destroyed an army" - the army which is still advancing, stopping Russia advancing anywhere and is larger and more well equipped than pre invasion.....?
so another lie proven Max.......come one, gotta try harder
6. The idea that you quote them having a t34 at their military parade is not worthy of answering.
Suffice to say you know nothing about the Russian military
7. Yes the USSR lost and were broken up and Russia was a mess until Putin took over and transformed its Fortunes.
The RED LINE is now 830 miles longer with Finland, ya plonker.
"He has successfully destroyed NATO shown it for the paper tiger it is, emptied its reserves of all artillery shells, and has absolutely stopped it moving any further than he wanted to. He will not stop until he goes to the Polish border if necessary"
utterly, utterly deluded or just a bare faced lie. the US and Germany have planned to scaled up artillery shell production 10 fold. add to that Germany has upped over all military spending to $100 billion.
NATO has more troops than ever, lost a fraction of the tanks, weapons systems, Russia has.......no fixed wing or rotary air combat vehicles destroyed for the west, hundreds for Russia...... russia hasnt even managed to destroy a single HIMARS system yet
Putin categorically stated NATO is not to move "an inch further east".................Finland DOUBLED, literally DOUBLED the NATO border with Russia
so another bare faced lie Max........you seriously have an issue, cerebrally speaking
wont stop to the Polish border??????......wtf, he cant even take 20% of Ukraine!!!!
4. Needle are fully involved and completely committed and they are losing at all levels.
5. All experts agree it is only the West who would be mad enough to use nuclear weapons Russia have stated categorically they will only respond the west changed their own laws to allow them to preemptively strike. The west are losing and therefore they are the ones we are in danger of using nuclear weapons. Russia has developed hypersonic which puts them ahead in the arms race for quite a while. All military experts know that the West have no answer to this currently.
Armasmaximilian was that the 3 day blitzkrieg of Kiev or the ten mile turkey shoot and the flop attempt to take the airport. HAHAHAHA perfection my a@@
3. Following on from number 2 where I add he has also destroyed the largest land-based army NATO had by multiple Folds. Yes he has stopped them crossing the red line by making Ukraine a part of Nato he has destroyed the Ukrainian army and created a rump state. The red lines are clear.
"1. No he made absolutely no miss calculation and planned his strategy to perfection"
wtf, you didnt actually write that with a straight face did you?
the mind boggles at how utterly moronic and detached from reality you really are
2. He has successfully destroyed NATO shown it for the paper tiger it is, emptied its reserves of all artillery shells, and has absolutely stopped it moving any further than he wanted to. He will not stop until he goes to the Polish border if necessary.
"One other question, have you been following the G20 summit in Delhi?"
is this the summit where Russia signed an agreement stating it was a "war", but yet Putin has been arresting his own people for using the word "war" and demanding his population/leadership only refer to said "war" as a "special military operation"?
1. No he made absolutely no miss calculation and planned his strategy to perfection.
"Oh Actually I have one more question what is the population of all the countries combined which you named?"
far, far, far more than those that vote with Russia........
Enough rubbish. I will buy back if it makes sense under 70p.
Max
answer my questions i put to you previously (the ones you pretended you "didnt have time for"), then i will engage with you
1) Did Putin make a massive miscalculation about how willing the west would be to get involved?
2) Putin stated a primary/strategic goal of the war was to ensure the non-expansion of NATO, how did that work out for him?
3) Putin has repeatedly warned of "red lines" that shouldn't be crossed, can you confirm what he did when the West crossed them every time?
4) If NATO get fully involved in the war, who wins based on a very high degree of probability?
5) Is it the sign of a stable, just and fair leadership that on a weekly basis they repeatedly threaten to nuke major cities across the globe?
6) Russia had a single tank at their victory day parade, a T-34 which was made in the 1940's. Is that a sign of strength or weakness?
7) Who won the cold war and why did the USSR collapse?
8) Before the Maidan Revolution the democratically elected Ukrainian parliament voted to remove the Russian puppet president Viktor Yanukovych, what were the numbers of the Yes to No votes cast for his removal from office?
Oh Actually I have one more question what is the population of all the countries combined which you named?
One other question, have you been following the G20 summit in Delhi?
Indrid tell me what victory looks like for Ukraine?
"Well, the collective West has redirected more than $100b in taxpayer money"
first off, that is the only response to my losses of "men and materiel" question then? brilliant.
secondly, you do realise its not just simply $100b of "tax payer money"? That is a blatant lie/propaganda line or you just don't know what you are talking about.
weaponry is a huge part of that figure, do you know how much of that is going to be saved in decommissioning costs?
and do you want to work out what that $100 billion works out per capita?
and yes on Ukraines losses, but Ukraine is not part of "the west", so another moot point. Add to that Ukraine didnt choose to be invaded, they have to fight or risk losing their freedoms, so their sacrifices are worth far, far more than anything Russia has to offer it's people, so another irrelevant point.
and no the sanctions haven't driven the Saudis away, it's the US's stance on human rights issues.
how has Germany been humiliated exactly?
cheap energy to China? eh, how is that a win for Russia, it's literally selling its most valuable export at prices way lower than it was pre war, and lower than current market prices, Russia is losing out far more than the West on the energy front.
"Have fun paying stupid power bills and having your daughter turned into a fake man by bolshevik groomers"
and well, that is just the ramblings of cerebrally challenged buffoon