Anglo Asian Regulatory News (AAZ)

Anglo Asian Mining plc / Ticker: AAZ / Index: AIM / Sector: Mining

28 May 2014

Anglo Asian Mining plc ('Anglo Asian' or 'the Company' or the 'Group')

Final Results

Anglo Asian Mining plc, the AIM listed gold producer in Azerbaijan, is pleased to announce its final audited results for the year ended 31 December 2013 ('FY 2013'). 

Overview

· Steady production performance at flagship Gedabek gold-copper-silver mine in Azerbaijan in FY 2013

· Total gold production of 52,068 ounces (2012: 50,215 ounces)

· Gold sales of 46,076 ounces (2012: 42,557 ounces) completed at an average of US$1,387 per ounce (2012: US$1,666 per ounce)

· Gold produced at an average cash operating cost net of by-product credits of US$626 per ounce (2012: US$668 per ounce) (cash costs have benefitted in 2013 from increased by product credits and also from 2012 investment in inventories)

· Silver production in doré totalled 20,263 ounces (2012: 20,133 ounces)

· SART copper concentrate contained 327 tonnes of copper, 45,621 ounces of silver and 39 ounces of gold (2012: 502 tonnes of copper, 98,158 ounces of silver and 86 ounces of gold)

· Record copper concentrate sales totalled US$6.4 million - significant increase year-on-year (2012: US$2.1 million)

· Sales contract entered into with Glencore Xstrata International plc for the sale of 550 wet metric tonnes of copper

· Successfully commissioned new agitation leaching plant at Gedabek in June 2013 on target and US$7 million under budget but with teething problems requiring fine tuning in the commissioning stage

· Production target to produce circa 62,000-67,000 ounces of gold for FY 2014 from the agitation leaching plant and heap leach operation and including ore from Anglo Asian's second mining operation Gosha, 50 km from Gedabek

· Continuing defined exploration and development programme to increase life of mine at Gedabek - upgraded JORC resource at Gedabek to 1.12 million ounces in the Measured and Indicated categories in October 2013

· Continuing to develop a high grade underground gold mine in the Gosha Contract Area in Azerbaijan

Financials

· Profit before tax of US$1.4 million (2012: US$28.6 million) on revenue of US$70.8 million (2012: US$73.5 million)

· Gross profit of US$13.3 million (2012: US$36.1 million)

· Operating cash flow before movement in working capital of US$17.9 million (2012: US$40.3 million)

· Net debt of US$45.5 million at 31 December 2013 (2012: US$28.3 million) calculated as aggregate of loans and borrowings less cash and cash equivalents

· Cash position of US$5.5million as at 31 December 2013 (2012: US$2.4 million)

Chairman's Statement

Anglo Asian has a progressive portfolio of assets which includes our flagship Gedabek gold, copper and silver mine in western Azerbaijan ('Gedabek') which produced 52,068 ounces of gold in FY 2013, a second development gold project, Gosha, only 50 km away from Gedabek which is moving into production this year, and a third gold exploration project, Ordubad, also in Azerbaijan. With the above multi-stage portfolio, it remains our strategy to continue to build a leading precious metal mining company in Azerbaijan. 

This has been a difficult period for gold companies, Anglo Asian being no exception. We have all had to adapt to the substantial reduction in the gold price experienced in 2013, with prices dropping from highs of US$1,880 in 2012 to lows of US$1,199 in 2013, which has had a knock-on effect on both revenue and profits. In light of this, in terms of financials for the period, we have reported a small profit of US$1.4 million before tax (2012: US$28.6 million). We achieved revenues of US$70.8 million (2012: US$73.5 million) and a gross profit of US$13.3 million (2012: US$36.1 million). These results are on the back of average gold prices of US$1,387 (2012: US$ 1,666), stable gold and copper concentrate production from Gedabek and record copper sales of US$6.4 million. While the market remains somewhat depressed, 2014 has already seen evidence of stabilisation of the price as the market finds a comfortable trading range and this is predicted to continue, a welcome relief following the volatile prices witnessed over the past few years.

The year under review has been focused on capacity building and implementing plans to ensure the future growth of Anglo Asian. This has been centred on increasing efficiencies in production at Gedabek to enable gold production levels in excess of 60,000 ounces for FY 2014 and beyond; increasing the life of mine of Gedabek through defined exploration and development programmes aimed to increase the reserve and resource base, which currently stands at 744,038 ounces and 1,123,767 ounces of gold, respectively; and progressing our second mining project, Gosha, which we have now developed with a view to transporting the high grade ore to Gedabek and in turn, increasing our gold annual production by the end of 2014. With the above developments in mind, I believe the Anglo Asian team has laid the foundations for the future.

Gedabek, which is located in western Azerbaijan on the mineralised Tethyan Tectonic Belt, one of the world's significant copper and gold bearing belts, is currently an open pit, agitation leaching plant and heap leach operation. In terms of gold production for the period, while there was a year-on-year increase at Gedabek in 2013 to 52,068 oz from 50,025 oz in 2012, we are disappointed that the figure came in under management's expectations as a result of the weather conditions and processing issues due to the change in the ore mineralogy that made it less amenable to agitation leaching resulting in lower recoveries in Q4 2013. The main focus for Anglo Asian in 2013 was the successful commissioning of our new agitation leaching plant in June 2013. This enabled us to achieve gold sales of 46,076 ounces at an average price of US$1,387 and silver sales of 19,016 ounces at an average price of US$25. The reason for the difference in sales and product produced is two-fold. Firstly, the government of Azerbaijan takes title to 12.75% of all metals produced due to the Product Sharing Agreement (as outlined later in this statement), and secondly, there is a time lag from production to sales. Q1 2014 gold production totalled 11,312 oz with gold sales of 10,403 oz at an average of US$1,303 per oz, and we are currently on track to deliver our revised FY2014 gold production target of 62,000-67,000oz of gold.

Importantly we also produce copper in the form of a precipitated copper sulphide concentrate by-product, which also contains silver with commercial value and a small amount of gold, from our Sulphidisation, Acidification, Recycling, and Thickening ('SART') plant at Gedabek. The plant is one of the largest of its kind in the industry and production from the plant for FY 2013 totalled 327 tonnes of copper, 45,621 ounces of silver and 39 ounces of gold. As previously mentioned, we were pleased with the FY 2013 copper concentrate sales, which totalled US$6.4 million, a significant increase from the US$2.1 million reported for FY2012. During Q4 2013 we entered into a sales contract with Glencore Xstrata International plc ('Glencore') for the sale of 550 wet metric tonnes ('WMT') of this concentrate. Under the terms of the agreement, Glencore agreed to purchase a total of 550 WMT of copper concentrate product during December 2013 and January 2014. These sales will see our copper concentrate product continuing to add to our bottom line and in turn increasing our profitability for FY 2014. In Q1 2014, production from SART totalled 141t of copper, together with 9,249oz of silver and 6oz of gold and we had stockpiles of 152 wet metric tonnes ('WMT') of copper concentrate product.  In terms of sales of these stockpiles, we have recently signed an agreement with the Swiss company, Industrial Minerals (SA), for the sale of our full copper concentrate production over the next three years.

As mentioned, a key focus of 2013 for the Company was the review of Gedabek's mining operations with a view to implementing initiatives and development plans to improve the production profile of the mine both in the near-term, and increasing the life of mine to ensure its future production success. Construction of the new agitation leaching plant, which had an expected CAPEX of US$52 million, was completed US$7 million under budget and on target with full commissioning in June 2013. The new plant was set up initially to treat 100 tonnes of ore per hour to increase both gold oxide and sulphide recovery to 85% and 69%, respectively, and positively impact gold production for the second half of 2013. We achieved this and in Q3 2013 we recorded quarterly gold production of 20,242 ounces and Q4 2013 gold production of 14,329 ounces, as a direct result of the new agitation leaching plant, however this was achieved with much higher than expected processing and operating costs, which management are working through to resolve through fine tuning at the plant. It is our intention to continue to improve gold production, with lower grade ore being processed through the original heap leaching process.

Whilst we are facing teething problems at the agitation leaching plant which have resulted in higher than expected rates of cyanide consumption and increased processing costs, we also continue to explore the greater Gedabek area with the aim of delineating further resources and reserves to increase the life of mine of the operation. Following the completion of 26,842 metres of drilling (99 holes) as part of an on-going exploration programme, we were delighted to announce in October 2013 an updated resource of 44,644,658 tonnes at 0.783 g/t of gold for 1,123,767 ounces in the Measured and Indicated categories.

Looking ahead, the Company is committed to improving the performance of the agitation leaching plant and also establishing a second mining operation in Azerbaijan. As mentioned, Gosha is located 50km away from Gedabek and is currently being advanced with a view to developing a high grade underground gold mine, which is expected to produce circa 15,000-20,000 ounces of gold per annum once in full production. Due to the proximity of Gosha to Gedabek it is our intention that gold ore produced at Gosha will be processed at our existing Gedabek plant, and post period end, we reported that 1,095 tonnes of ore had been mined at Gosha, with 250 tonnes with an average grade of 12 g/t sent to Gedabek. Looking ahead, we are aiming to process 58,000 tonnes of mined ore from Gosha at Gedabek at an average grade of 6 g/t during FY 2014, which is expected to contribute circa 10,000oz of gold to our production figure for the year.

Further exploration works in Ordubad resulted in the issuance of a notice of discovery for two gold deposits, Piyazbashi and Agyurt. The Company will continue the exploration work to seek more mineral potential in this area.

In terms of our corporate activity for the period, we continue to work closely with the Government of Azerbaijan.  As previously mentioned, we have a Production Sharing Agreement in place with the Government of Azerbaijan based on the established Azeri oil industry model. Up until the time we have recovered all of our carried forward, unrecovered costs, the Government of Azerbaijan effectively takes 12.75% of commercial products of any mine we bring into production, with Anglo Asian taking 87.25%. We expect to continue retaining 87.25% of the commercial products based on costs incurred to date and with the construction of the agitation leaching plant, this level of recovery is expected to continue for 2014.

We also have strong relations with the International Bank of Azerbaijan ('IBA'), which is majority owned by the Government of Azerbaijan, and have various financing agreements in place with the bank. As at 31 December 2013, the Company's net debt totalled US$45.5 million (2012: US$28.3 million) inclusive of cash of US$5.5 million (2012: US$2.4 million). This increase in net debt, was due to an additional loan agreement undertaken with the IBA to finance the new agitation leaching plant at Gedabek, which as mentioned had an estimated CAPEX of US$52 million. The new IBA loan was then partially refinanced with the Amsterdam Trade Bank N.V. ('ATB') and the amount of these loans at 31 December 2013 were US$11.5 million and US$36.7 million with IBA and ATB respectively, and cash in the bank was US$5.5 million at 31 December 2013. Despite higher than expected operating costs in the agitation leaching plant, due to issues with the ore type and recovery rates, the Company is not expecting to breach the Debt Service Coverage Ratio ('DSCR') covenant with ATB, although as a precaution has received a waiver against this covenant for the period to 30 June 2014. The DSCR ratio required is 1.25, the waiver reduces the required threshold to 1.1 in the interim reporting period of 2014. In January 2013, the Company also entered into an arrangement with industrial group Atlas Copco for the financing of underground mining equipment for the Gosha gold project for US$3.8 million (representing 85% of the equipment value) with a one-off 1% arrangement fee and 8.47% annual interest fee, to be paid in eight quarterly instalments starting April 2013. US$2.8 million was outstanding at 31 December 2013.

As a company we are committed to maintaining high health, safety, social and environmental standards. We have a Health, Safety, Environment and Technology Committee ('HSET') established at Board level, which is under the chairmanship of Professor John Monhemius, one of our Non-executive Directors. This committee has the responsibility to oversee all aspects of the HSET of the Company and to make recommendations to the Board. We are saddened to have to report that during Q2 2013 there was a fatality at Gedabek, the first since the mine was opened. This tragic incident was due to a Contractor's haulage truck overturning on 5 April 2013, fatally injuring the driver. Control measures for fleet transport were reinforced following this accident and these now include radar gun speed measurements, in-vehicle cameras, road patrolling and maintenance enforcement.

In Q2 2013 an action plan and audit report was submitted to the International Cyanide Management Institute (ICMI) - Cyanide Code. Corrective actions were implemented as required by the Audit review for the Cyanide Code and the process is on-going. Various other environmental measures were implemented in the year including planting of 883 trees, profiling and landscaping of disturbed terrain, and regular monthly campaigns for surface and groundwater monitoring and on-going vehicle monitoring. The goal of the company is to strive towards zero harm and much work has been done to instil a culture of safety whereby employees understand that they have a duty to take care of themselves and their co-workers. In Q3 2013 the Lost Time injury (LTI) rate was zero at a time of increased hours and productivity as a result of expansion. A total of 156 LTI free days were recorded and this pleasing trend continued into Q4 2013 where, zero LTI's were again maintained, bringing a record of 248 LTI-free days since the last reported incident on 26 April 2013.

We have approximately 555 personnel working in the company and we recognise that mining is a hazardous environment and we continue to seek improvements.

2013 has been a year of transition and investment for Anglo Asian. The commissioning of our agitation leaching plant at Gedabek was a significant milestone for the Company, and an investment made in order to improve gold recoveries and reduce operating costs. The plant will enable us to deliver on these long term objectives, however due to initial teething problems at the plant we were disappointed not to be able to meet our FY2013 gold production target. Our proactive and highly experienced management team are addressing the issues and post-period end, have installed a continuous Knelson concentrator, which has already improved gold recoveries to more than 80% by pre-treating the ore to isolate the copper sulphides that have been limiting the recovery of gold. 

The complexity of the ore at Gedabek necessitated the installation of a Resin in Pulp plant ('RIP') instead of the industry standard Carbon in Leach (CIL) technology. RIP is new technology in the gold industry and this, together with the complexity of the ore, has resulted in a longer than expected period of commissioning, with fine tuning required. The technical team have been working to optimise the plant settings for the type of ore we have and by the end of Q1 2014 progress is being made going into Q2 2014.

With these improvements we are on track to meet our new FY2014 target of between 62,000 to 67,000oz gold production, of which 10,000oz will come from our second project, Gosha, where significant progress was made over the period, with the first 250 tonnes of the 1,095 tonnes of ore mined to date having been processed at Gedabek, only 50 km away.

With record copper sales of US$6.4 million during the period, and with our Gedabek initiatives in place with noticeable results starting to flow through, we look forward to the year ahead as we continue to maximise value for shareholders. I would like to take this opportunity to thank our Anglo Asian employees, partners, the Government of Azerbaijan, both ATB and IBA, advisers, fellow directors and shareholders for their continued support as we continue to build the Company into a leading mid-tier gold, copper, silver producer in Azerbaijan and Caucasia.

Khosrow Zamani

Non-executive Chairman

Strategic Report

The Strategic Report is a new statutory requirement under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors' Report) Regulations 2013 and is intended to provide fair and balanced information that enables the directors to be satisfied that they have complied with s172 of the Companies Act 2006 which sets out the Directors' duty to promote the success of the Company.

The directors present their strategic report for the year ended 31 December 2013.

Principle Activity

The principal activity of Anglo Asian Mining PLC is that of a holding company and a provider of support and management services to its operating subsidiary R.V. Investment Group Services LLC ('RVIG'). The Company together with its subsidiaries (together referred to as the 'Group') is involved in the exploration and development of gold and copper projects in the Republic of Azerbaijan and the operation of the Gedabek mine in the Republic of Azerbaijan.

Chief Executive Review

Anglo Asian has a large 1,962 sq km portfolio of gold/copper assets in Azerbaijan, at various stages of the development cycle. This includes our flagship Gedabek gold/copper mine in western Azerbaijan which produced 52,068 ounces of gold in 2013; Gosha, our second gold development project located 50km away from Gedabek, which is set to move into full production during 2014; and Ordubad, our early stage gold-copper exploration project, which is located in the Nakhchivan region of Azerbaijan.

During the period under review we have been focused on developing and implementing growth plans to ensure the future success of our mining operations and increasing our gold, copper and silver production profile with the near-term target for FY 2014 of between 62,000 to 67,000 ounces of gold and copper production of 595 tonnes.

Mining Operations

Gedabek

The Gedabek mining operation is located in a 300 sq km Contract Area in western Azerbaijan on the Tethyan Tectonic Belt, one of the world's significant copper and gold bearing structures. 

The mine, which first poured gold in 2009, is an open-pit mining operation which utilises both heap leach and agitation leaching processing facilities for gold and silver production and a SART processing plant to produce copper.

For the 12 month period to 31 December 2013, gold production totalled 52,068 ounces, which was an increase of 2,043oz in comparison to FY 2012. For the period Anglo Asian completed gold sales of 46,076oz Au at an average of US$1,387 per oz.

The following summary table of gold production and prices outlines quarter-on-quarter gold production at Gedabek for FY 2013. 

With regards to silver production from our heap and agitation leaching operations at Gedabek a total of 20,263 ounces was produced during FY 2013.

As previously disclosed, to improve gold recovery and production at Gebabek the Company undertook a pre-feasibility study and constructed and commissioned a new agitation leaching plant in June 2013. The rationale for extending Gedabek's processing facilities from the original heap leaching operations was that compared to heap leaching, agitation leaching of milled ore can deliver higher recoveries, with the immediate production of gold. Heap leach operations are traditionally a low-cost processing route that many mining operations, including Gedabek, adopt when they first move into production due to the low-capital construction costs, however heap leaching has limitations with regards to the size of ore being leached (-25mm). This limitation results in gold recoveries of circa 70%, with leaching cycles extending typically up to a year, depending on the ore mineralogy.

A further need for the agitation leaching plant was due to the lack of space caused by the topology of the Gedabek mine area. This would have necessitated costly investment for huge earthwork removal, or building new leach pads too far away from the mine, with energy and associated logistics costs to transfer the ore to the leach pads and returning the solution to Gedabek.

The new agitation leaching plant, since its commissioning, is processing high grade oxide ore and additional sulphidic ore resources that were not suitable for Gedabek's heap leaching operation and will also process spent ore from the leach heaps to further improve total gold recoveries. The plant has been initially treating 100 tonnes of ore per hour, which can increase to up to 150 tonnes per hour with upgrades and under optimal conditions, with an expected average of 120 tonnes per hour. Gold recovery rates were initially estimated at 85% for oxide material and 69% for sulphide material. In September 2013 we had achieved 82% recovery in terms of oxide gold and we are also carrying out additional testing to see if these recovery rates can be further improved.

In line with our mining plan, since the beginning of 2014 our agitation leaching plant has continued to process and produce the majority of the gold and silver at Gedabek, with the heap leach processing operation supporting. As mentioned in our Q1 2014 operations update, whilst the new agitation leaching plant has helped increase our gold recoveries and indeed production potential at Gedabek, there have been teething problems where we have experienced difficulties with recovery rates of gold from the high-copper sulphide ore, which is often associated with deeper mining. Accordingly we have adapted the agitation leaching plant and fitted a Knelson concentrator in March 2014 to help with this. Early results have shown some enhanced gold recovery from high-copper sulphide ore along with some reduced cyanide consumption per ounce of gold.

The technical team have been fine tuning the plant to optimise the settings for the ore we have at Gedabek and at the end of Q1 2014 progress in this regard is evident. The RIP plant is new technology in the industry and it threw up some early teething problems, which has necessitated fine tuning of the plant to get the most efficient recovery of gold. This resulted in lower production than expected at the end of 2013 and into Q1 2014.

In terms of processing, Gedabek's heap leaching operation performed in line with management's expectation with 576,748 tonnes of dry ore stacked onto the leach pad with an average gold content of 1.31 g/t (FY 2012: 753,601 tonnes of dry ore with an average gold grade of 3.03g/t). The reduced amount of ore and lower grade was in accordance with our mining plan for FY 2013 which took into account the commissioning of the new agitation leaching plant.

Table 2

Between June 2013 and 31 December 2013, 350,645 tonnes of ore were processed through the agitation leaching plant at an average gold grade of 3.73 g/t.

In addition to gold and silver production, our Gedabek mining operation also produces copper concentrate from our Sulphidisation, Acidification, Recycling and Thickening ('SART') plant, which recovers copper in the form of precipitated copper sulphide concentrate containing silver and minor amounts of gold. For FY 2013 copper concentrate production totalled 327 tonnes Cu, 45,621 oz Ag and 39 oz Au (2012: 502t Cu, 98,158oz Ag and 86 oz Au). Our copper production for FY 2013 was significantly below that of FY 2012, but we have now made operational improvements in the SART plant and put in place a new dedicated SART management team and our FY 2014 copper concentrate production target is 595t.

Copper revenue for FY 2013 reached record levels having completed sales worth US$6.4 million. During 2013 sales agreements for copper were reached with Seagate Minerals and Metals Inc in July for 750 wet metric tonnes ('WMT') of copper concentrate and in December we entered into a new sales contract with Glencore Xstrata International plc ('Glencore') for the sale of 550 WMT. Additionally, we have recently signed a three year contract with International Minerals SA to take all of our copper concentrate production over this term. Now that we have sales contracts in place, we see our copper concentrate production and sales helping to add to our bottom line for FY2014 and beyond and in turn increasing our profitability.

Gedabek Exploration and Development

Increasing Gedabek's production profile and life of mine remains a priority for the Company and so we have an active on-going exploration and development programme aimed at increasing the resource and reserve base at Gedabek.

Our reserve base remains as per 7 June 2012 at 20,312,879 tonnes at 1.139 g/t gold for 744,038 ounces, 0.293% copper for 59,479 tonnes, and 9.456 g/t silver for 6,175,531 ounces

Following the completion of a 99 hole, 26,842 metre drilling programme in Q1 2013 we were delighted to announce an updated Measured and Indicated JORC compliant resource at Gedabek of 44,644,658t at 0.783 g/t of Au for 1,123,767oz Au, and a total JORC compliant resource (including Inferred ore) of 51,591,901t at 0.754 g/t Au for 1,250,043oz Au, 0.155 % Cu for 80,036t Cu and 5.915 g/t Ag for 9,811,719oz Ag (at a cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au).

Importantly, the Measured and Indicated gold resources (including mined ore) increased by circa 20% over the resource announced in March 2012, with an increase in ore tonnage from 37.1 million tonnes to 44.6 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.78 g/t. Also it should be noted that the updated resource did not include the 145,000 ounces of gold extracted from Gedabek between 1 January 2012 and 31 August 2013, which resulted in the production of 81,500 ounces of gold, with the remainder contained in stockpiled ore.

Table 3

The updated resource also increased our geological knowledge and confidence in the quantity and quality of the mineral resources and ore reserves within the current economic open pit limit at Gedabek. It also increased the mineral resources of the southern regions and led to the discovery of extensions of the gold, copper and silver mineralisation in the west, northwest and northern regions around the existing pit.

In order to further test the mineralisation at Gedabek around the greater area, a current 3,000m drilling programme continues to verify high grade gold discovery just 400m north of the Gedabek operating mine area. In January 2014, we were delighted to announce initial drill results which highlighted stand-out drill results such as 1m of 207.1 g/t Au.

Core hole AIMCDD86 ('hole 86'), to the northwest of the Gedabek mine, was drilled to a depth of 650m earlier in 2013. In a zone between 250m and 350m there was evidence of intense alteration accompanied by high grade gold mineralisation. To test the continuity of this mineralisation, an additional hole (AIMCDD106) was drilled 20m east of hole 86 to a depth of 349m in October 2013. There are two zones of significance in core hole 106. The upper zone of mineralisation has 5m of 95 g/t Ag (3.1 g/t opt Ag) at 234m to 238m and a lower zone that contains 41m at 7.6g/t of Au from 296m to 337m. Within this lower zone, 1m of 101 g/t Ag (3.3 g/t opt Ag) with 78.7 g/t Au (2.5 g/t opt Au) occurs at 313 metres.

This new area, 400m from the current pit, is informally called the Gadiz mineralisation, however should the deposit be extended, it will be likely be renamed Gedabek North. The newly completed core hole in this area (AIMCDD107) was drilled 20m to the south of AIMCDD86 to a target depth of approximately 445m. 

Two other core holes (108 and 109) are now being drilled to the west of hole AIMCDD86 for an additional 900m. We had intended to drill these holes during 2013 but had an immediate need for core data in Pit 4 for the 2014 mine development plan. From experience, we have found that drilling closer spaced holes at Gedabek is more effective for deposit delineation than wider spaced drilling due to the pod-like nature of the high mineralisation zones over the 1,500m of potential extension to the east. Validation of this mineral discovery immediately north of the current open pit working at Gedabek supports the theory that Gedabek is part of a much larger mineralisation system. While the full extent of this discovery is unknown, an aggressive exploration programme in 2014 will determine how much additional resource will be available to extend the mine life at Gedabek. A geophysical programme is scheduled to commence in Q2 of 2014 and will assist in the optimisation of drill hole targets.

The apparent high grade nature of this significant new discovery would certainly enhance our ability to optimise the reprocessing of spent heap leach tailings through the agitation leach plant by blending. We look forward to continued success for the potential exploitation of this new find.

Gosha

Our second mining project, the 300 sq km Gosha Contract Area, is located in western Azerbaijan, 50 km north-west of Gedabek. We are currently developing Gosha as a small, high grade, underground gold mine to produce gold at an average rate of 15,000 to 20,000 ounces per annum for a period of at least five years. It is our intention to extract the ore from Gosha, transport it, and utilise our flagship Gedabek mining operations processing facilities to treat it. We will continue to review the best method of treating the Gosha ore.

During 2013 significant progress has been made in the development of the mine at Gosha, which contains three main prospects: Gosha, Itkirlan and Munduglu. A development work programme and budget was submitted to the Government of Azerbaijan on 4 December 2012 with a view to moving to production by 2014, whilst at the same time implementing further drilling campaigns in order to increase the economics of the proposed mine. Underground mining equipment was purchased, and service and infrastructure building work commenced in H2 2013, including developing access roads, workshop, offices, a laboratory and building upgrade work. The mine production programme was focused on developing 1,975 metres of production and haulage galleries to produce 30,000 tonnes of ore, with an average grade of 15.6g/t of gold and 38.6g/t of silver, together with 35,500 tonnes of waste. We successfully intercepted the ore vein at Gosha in September 2013 and a trial batch of 100 tonnes of ore was mined on 4 September 2013.

At the end of Q1 2014, a total of 1,095 tonnes of ore had been mined at Gosha and 250 tonnes at an average grade of 12 g/t Au had been sent to Gedabek for processing. We are targeting 58,000 tonnes of mined ore from Gosha for 2014 at an average grade of 6 g/t Au, which is expected to contribute circa 10,000oz of gold production to Anglo Asian's FY 2014 production target.

Ordubad

Our 462 sq km Ordubad Contract Area is located in the Nakhchivan region of Azerbaijan and contains numerous targets including Shakardara, Piyazbashi, Misdag, Agyurt, Shalala and Diakchay, which are all located within a 5 km radius of each other. Development at Ordubad forms part of our longer-term development portfolio as a mid-tier gold, copper and silver mining company.

Financial Review

Introduction

Anglo Asian generated revenues of US$70,819,908 (2012: $73,521,389) as a result of gold, silver and copper concentrate sales from the Gedabek mine.

US$64,385,546 of the revenues (2012: US$71,446,844) were generated from the sale of Anglo Asian's share of the production of doré bars for the year which comprised 46,075 ounces of gold and 19,016 ounces of silver (2012: 42,557 ounces of gold and 16,342 ounces of silver) at an average price of US$1,387 per ounce and US$25 per ounce respectively (2012: US$1,666 per ounce and US$32 per ounce). In addition, Anglo Asian generated revenue from the sale of copper concentrate of US$6,434,362 (2012: US$2,074,545).

The Group incurred mining cost of sales of US$57,479,823 (2012: US$37,445,377) and therefore reported a gross profit of US$13,340,085 for 2013 (2012: US$36,076,012). The increased cost of sales in FY 2013 was mainly due to higher processing costs in the agitation leaching plant following high cyanide consumption and increased depreciation following the commissioning of the agitation leaching plant.

The Group incurred administration expenses of US$6,845,018 (2012: US$5,915,352) and finance costs for the year of US$3,779,895 (2012: US$1,510,085). The Group recorded profit before tax for the year of US$1,390,617 (2012: US$28,550,979). The finance costs for the year comprises interest on the credit facilities and loans, interest on letters of credit and accretion expenses on the rehabilitation provision.

During 2013, the Group repaid its original loan with IBA of US$1.8 million and took further loans from IBA and the ATB as detailed below.

In October 2013, the Group entered into a loan facility agreement ('Facility Agreement') with the Amsterdam Trade Bank N.V. ('ATB'). Under the terms of the Facility Agreement, ATB agreed to provide a committed term loan facility of US$37 million to Azerbaijan International Mining Company LLP ('AIMC') a wholly owned subsidiary of Anglo Asian. The proceeds were used to reduce the Company's existing loan facility with the International Bank of Azerbaijan ('IBA') which was used for the construction of an agitation leaching plant at its flagship gold, copper and silver mine, Gedabek, and to pay certain fees and expenses in relation to the arrangement of the ATB facility. The ATB facility has a term of 58 months and attracts a quarterly interest rate of LIBOR plus 8.25 per cent. The first repayment instalment commences on the 25th day of the 16th month from the draw down date and the outstanding amount shall be repaid in equal quarterly instalments. The Company's existing loan facility with the IBA stood at US$11.5 million at 31 December 2013 after the ATB drawdown was applied. This loan continues to attract 12 per cent interest per annum payable quarterly.

The amount of the loans with the International Bank of Azerbaijan ('IBA') and the Amsterdam Trade Bank ('ATB') were US$11.5 million and US$36.7 million respectively and cash in the bank was US$5.5 million at 31 December 2013. In January 2013, the Company entered into an arrangement with industrial group Atlas Copco for the financing of underground equipment for the Gosha gold project for US$3.8 million (representing 85% of the equipment value) with a one-off 1% arrangement fee and 8.47% annual interest fee, to be paid in eight quarterly installments starting April 2013. Including this loan, the net debt, being interest bearing loans and borrowings less cash and cash equivalents stood at US$45.5 million at 31 December 2013. The latest management cashflow forecasts for the six months to 30 June 2014 show that the DSCR covenant with ATB against the loan of US$37.0 million will be met, despite this, as a precaution, a waiver has been issued by ATB for the reporting period to 30 June 2014 reducing the required DSCR level from 1.25 to 1.1. An action plan has been submitted to ATB detailing the recovery to 31 December 2014 which includes installation of the new Knelson concentrator, new production management and Gosha ore adding to production. Additionally the SART plant is performing well due to new dedicated management and improvements at the plant. A much more favourable cyanide contract is also in place which will help reduce processing costs for the remainder of 2014. The first principal repayment to ATB is due on 25 February 2015.

Remaining debt at 31 December 2013 stands at US$51,021,424 (2012: US$30,759,749) of which US$11,501,231 is due to IBA, US$36,696,644 is due to ATB and US$2,823,549 is due to Atlas Copco.

The Group held cash balances at 31 December 2013 of US$5,488,773 (2012: US$2,410,730) and inventories at cost of US$28,741,822 (2012: US$36,427,632).

Net assets of the Group were US$96,750,031 (2012: US$96,369,154).

During the year exploration and evaluation expenditure of US$220,945 (2012: US$1,415,766) was incurred and capitalised.

The Group paid corporation tax during the year of US$800,000 (2012: US$2,593,713). The Company has booked a deferred tax liability of US$1,055,115 in 2013 (2012: US$6,883,330) bringing the total deferred tax liability provision to US$20,400,014 (2012: US$19,344,899).

Reza Vaziri

President and Chief Executive

Consolidated statement of profit or loss

for the year ended 31 December 2013

Consolidated statement of other comprehensive income

for the year ended 31 December 2013

Consolidated statement of financial position

as at 31 December 2013

Consolidated statement of cash flows

for the year ended 31 December 2013

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

for the year ended 31 December 2013

1. Going concern

The Directors have prepared the consolidated financial statements on a going concern basis after reviewing the Group's cash position for the period to 31 December 2015 and satisfying themselves that the Group will have sufficient funds on hand to realise its assets and meet its obligations as and when they fall due.

In making this assessment the Directors have acknowledged the challenging and uncertain market the Group is operating in. Over 2013 gold prices varied between $1,199/Oz and $1,694/Oz and 2014 has seen the depressed market continue, making budgeting difficult and reducing margins. Further, with the Agitation Leaching Plant experiencing initial commissioning inefficiencies due to inconsistent feed grades and Gedabek suffering inclement weather over Q4 2013 and Q1 2014 the outlook remains challenging and uncertain.

Whilst the Group is forecasting to meet its required Debt Service Cover Ratio of 1.25 in the six months to 30 June 2014 the Group approached ATB Bank for a waiver to reduce the required ratio to 1.1 in this period as a precaution. ATB have provided this waiver. Breaching a covenant can ultimately result in the full loan balance being called upon immediately. The Group submitted a plan to ATB Bank outlining a number of actions it has taken, including the recent employment of a new Operations Director and Plant Manager, new SART management team and the installation of a Knelson concentrator which has already shown improvements. The Group does not need to make any principal repayments until 25 February 2015 and continues to forecast all interest and principal payments over the going concern period. Loans were previously paid ahead of their scheduled repayment dates in 2012 and 2013 and as a consequence, the Directors believe that the Group is well placed to manage its capital risks successfully under the current uncertain economic outlook.

Key to achieving the Group's forecast cash position, and therefore its going concern assumption, is achieving the forecast production and gold price assumptions. Should there be a moderate and sustained decrease in either the production or gold price assumptions, significant doubt would be cast over the Group's short term cash position. Under this circumstance, the Group would look to defer all non-essential capital expenditure and administrative costs in order to preserve cash. The Group's assumptions are neither overly aggressive nor overly conservative and appropriate rigour and diligence has been performed by the Directors in approving the assumptions. This includes benchmarking forecast price assumptions against a range of broker forecasts and having an internal Qualified Person review and sign off on the mine plan and production estimates. The Directors therefore believe all assumptions are prepared on a realistic basis, using the best information available.

The Group's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position, can be found in the Chairman's Statement on pages 2 to 6 and the Strategic Report on pages 7 to 12. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows, liquidity position and borrowing facilities are described in the Finance Review on pages 13 to 17. In addition, note 23 to the financial statements includes the Group's objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital, its financial risk management objectives, details of its financial instruments and its exposures to credit risk and liquidity risk.

After making enquiries, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Group continues to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the annual report and accounts.

2. General information

Anglo Asian Mining PLC (the 'Company') is a public limited company incorporated and operating in the UK under the Companies Act 2006. The Group's ordinary shares are traded on the Alternative Investment Market ('AIM') of the London Stock Exchange. The nature of the Group's operations and its principal activities are set out in the Strategic Report on pages 7 to 12.

These consolidated financial statements are presented in US Dollars. Foreign operations are included in accordance with the policies set out in note 3.

3. Significant accounting policies

Basis of preparation

The consolidated financial statements of the Group are presented as required by the Companies Act 2006 and were approved for issue on 27 May 2014. These consolidated financial statements, for the year ended 31 December 2013 and 31 December 2012, are prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards ('IFRS') as adopted by the EU. The consolidated financial statements have also been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee ('IFRIC') interpretations and with those parts of the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention unless described otherwise in the accounting policy below.

Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Group made up to 31 December each year. Control is achieved where the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.

All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.

The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.

Changes in accounting policies, new standards and interpretations

The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year except for the following new amendment to the standards adopted by the Group on 1 January 2013:

IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment

The improvement clarifies that major spare parts and servicing equipment that meet the definition of property, plant and equipment are not inventory and became effective for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The application of IAS 16 did not impact the Group's financial position or performance.

IAS 19 Employee benefits

The most fundamental change of the numerous amendments made to IAS 19 is to remove the so-called 'corridor-approach' and to require the recognition of all actuarial gains and losses from the re-measurement of the defined benefit obligation and the fair values of the plan assets in other comprehensive income in the current period. The application of IAS 19 did not impact the Group's financial position or performance.

IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine

IFRIC 20 now clarifies when an entity should recognise production phase waste removal (stripping) costs (production stripping costs) incurred in relation to a surface mining operation, as an asset. Such an asset will be referred to as a stripping activity asset. The interpretation is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and has impacted the way in which the Group accounts for production stripping costs.

The Group's surface mining operations have been concentrated on Gedabek mine since start of production phase in 2009. The Group had previously accounted for production stripping costs using the life-of-mine average strip ratio approach (explained above).

There was no deferred stripping balance related to Gedabek as at 1 January 2012.

The adoption of IFRIC 20 resulted in recognition of deferred stripping asset in amount of US$2,877,584 as at 31 December 2013 and had no impact on the Group's financial position at the transition date of 1 January 2012 and results of its operations, cash flows and earnings per share for the year ended 31 December 2012.

IFRS 13 'Fair Value Measurement'

IFRS 13 establishes a single source of guidance under IFRS for all fair value measurements. IFRS 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather provides guidance on how to measure fair value under IFRS when fair value is required or permitted. IFRS 13 defines fair value as an exit price. As a result of the guidance in IFRS 13, the Group reassessed its policies for measuring fair values - in particular its valuation inputs such as non-performance risk for fair value measurement of liabilities. IFRS 13 also requires additional disclosures.

Application of IFRS 13 has not materially impacted the fair value measurements of the Group. Additional disclosures where required, are provided in the individual notes relating to the assets and liabilities whose fair values were determined.

Other amendments resulting from improvements to IFRSs to the following standards did not have any impact on the accounting policies, financial position or performance of the Group:

· IFRS 1 'First-Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards' (Amendment) - Severe Hyperinflation and Removal of Fixed Dates for First-Time Adopters; and

· IFRS 7 'Financial Instruments: Disclosures - Enhanced Derecognition Disclosure Requirements'.

· IAS 1 Financial statement presentation - presentation of items of other comprehensive income the amended standard became effective for financial years beginning on or after 1 July 2012. The amendment requires the grouping of items in other comprehensive income based on whether they will be potentially reclassifiable to profit or loss at a future point of time or whether they will never be reclassified.

New standards and amendments issued, but not yet effective

The standards and interpretations that are issued but not yet effective up to the date of issuance of the Group's consolidated financial statements are listed below are those that the Group reasonably expects will have an impact on disclosures, financial position or performance when applied at a future date. The Group intends to adopt these standards when they become effective.

IFRS 9 Financial instruments

The standard has been issued as the IASB completes each phase of its project to replace IAS 39. The first elements of IFRS 9 were issued in November 2009 and October 2010 to replace the parts of IAS 39 that relate to the classification and measurement of financial instruments. In November 2013 an amendment was issued to address hedge accounting and to remove the previously determined effective date of 1 January 2015. Instead, the IASB proposes to set the effective date of IFRS 9 when it completes the impairment phase of the project. The Group will quantify the effect in conjunction with the other phases, when the final standard including all phases is issued.

IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements

The new standard provides additional guidance to assist in the determination of which entities are controlled and are required to be consolidated. This standard replaces the portion of IAS 27 Consolidated and separate financial statements that addresses the accounting for consolidated financial statements. The IASB implementation date is for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 whereas the standard becomes mandatory in the EU only for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The Group is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on the financial position and performance, but based on the preliminary analysis, no material impact is expected.

IFRS 11 Joint arrangements

The new standard replaces IAS 31 Interests in joint ventures and SIC 13 Jointly-controlled entities - non-monetary contributions by venturers. The IASB implementation date is for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 whereas the standard becomes mandatory in the EU only for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The standard defines contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement and the accounting for joint operations and joint ventures. The Group is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on the financial position and performance, but based on the preliminary analysis, no material impact is expected.

IFRS 12 Disclosure of involvement with other entities

The new standard covers the disclosures that were previously required in consolidated financial statements under IAS 27 Consolidated

and separate financial statements as well as those included in IAS 31 Interests in joint ventures and IAS 28 Investments in associates. The IASB implementation date is for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 whereas the standard becomes mandatory in the EU only for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014.

The Group is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on the financial position and performance, but based on the preliminary analysis, no material impact is expected.

IAS 19 Employee benefits - defined benefit plans: employee contributions

The amendment to the standard was issued in November 2013 and becomes effective for financial years beginning on or after 1 July

2014. The amendment provides guidance in respect of the accounting for employee contributions set out in the formal terms of a defined benefit plan. The Group is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on the financial position and performance, but based on the preliminary analysis, no material impact is expected.

IAS 32 Financial instruments: presentation - offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities

The amendments clarify existing application issues relating to the offset of financial assets and financial liabilities requirements. The amendments are not effective until annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014 with retrospective application. The Group is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on the financial position and performance, but based on the preliminary analysis, no material impact is expected.

IAS 36 Impairment of assets - recoverable amount disclosures

The amendment to the standard was issued in May 2013 and becomes effective for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2014.The amendment removes the requirement to disclose recoverable amounts when there has been no impairment or reversal of impairment. Further to that, the disclosure requirements have been aligned with those under US GAAP for impaired assets. The Group is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on the financial position and performance, but based on the preliminary analysis, no material impact is expected.

Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions

The preparation of the Group's consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions are continuously evaluated and are based on management's experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual outcomes can differ from these estimates. In particular, information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty considered by management in preparing the consolidated financial statements is described below.

Ore reserves and resources

Ore reserves are estimates of the amount of ore that can be economically and legally extracted from the Group's mining properties. The Group estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources, based on information compiled by appropriately qualified persons relating to the geological data on the size, depth and shape of the ore body and requires complex geological judgements to interpret the data. The estimation of recoverable reserves is based upon factors such as estimates of foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, future capital requirements and production costs along with geological assumptions and judgements made in estimating the size and grade of the ore body. Changes in the reserve or resource estimates may impact upon the carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets, mine properties, property, plant and equipment, provision for rehabilitation and depreciation and amortisation charges.

Exploration and evaluation expenditure (note13)

The application of the Group's accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires judgement in determining whether it is likely that future economic benefits are likely either from future exploitation or sale or where activities have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of reserves. The determination of a Joint Ore Reserves Committee ('JORC') resource is itself an estimation process that requires varying degrees of uncertainty depending on sub-classification and these estimates directly impact the point of deferral of exploration and evaluation expenditure. The deferral policy requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions about future events or circumstances, in particular whether an economically viable extraction operation can be established. Estimates and assumptions made may change if new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalised, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, the amount capitalised is written off in the consolidated statement of profit or loss in the period when the new information becomes available.

Inventories (note 18)

Net realisable value tests are performed at least annually and represent the estimated future sales price of the product based on prevailing spot metals prices at the reporting date, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale.

Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tonnes added and removed from the stockpile, the number of contained gold ounces based on assay data and the estimated recovery percentage based on the expected processing method.

Stockpile tonnages are verified by periodic surveys.

Impairment of tangible and intangible assets (note 13 and 14)

The assessment of tangible and intangible assets for any internal and external indications of impairment involves judgement. Each reporting period, the Group assess whether there are indicators of impairment, if indicated than a formal estimate of recoverable amount is performed and an impairment loss recognised to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds recoverable amount. Recoverable amount is determined as the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Determining whether the projects are impaired requires an estimation of the value in use of the individual areas to which value has been ascribed. The value in use calculation requires the entity to estimate the future cash flows expected to arise from the projects and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate present value.

Production start date

The Group assesses the stage of each mine under construction to determine when a mine moves into the production stage. The criteria used to assess the start date are determined based on the unique nature of each mine construction project, such as the complexity of a plant and its location. The Group considers various relevant criteria to assess when the mine is substantially complete, ready for its intended use and is reclassified from 'Assets under construction' to 'Producing mines' and 'Property, plant and equipment'. Some of the criteria will include, but are not limited to, the following:

· the level of capital expenditure compared to the construction cost estimates;

· completion of a reasonable period of testing of the mine plant and equipment;

· ability to produce metal in saleable form (within specifications); and

· ability to sustain on-going production of metal.

When a mine construction project moves into the production stage, the capitalisation of certain mine construction costs ceases and costs are either regarded as inventory or expensed, except for costs that qualify for capitalisation relating to mining asset additions or improvements, underground mine development or mineable reserve development. This is also the point at which the depreciation/amortisation recognition commences.

Contingencies

By their nature, contingencies will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The assessment of contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgement and estimates of the outcome of future events.

Mine rehabilitation provision (note 22)

The Group assesses its mine rehabilitation provision annually. Significant estimates and assumptions are made in determining the provision for mine rehabilitation as there are numerous factors that will affect the ultimate liability payable. These factors include estimates of the extent and costs of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, regulatory changes and changes in discount rates. Those uncertainties may result in future actual expenditure differing from the amounts currently provided. The provision at the consolidated statement of financial position date represents management's best estimate of the present value of the future rehabilitation costs required. Changes to estimated future costs are recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position by either increasing or decreasing the rehabilitation liability and rehabilitation asset if the initial estimate was originally recognised as part of an asset measured in accordance with IAS 16 'Property, Plant and Equipment'.

Recovery of deferred tax assets (note 11)

Judgement is required in determining whether deferred tax assets are recognised on the consolidated statement of financial position. Deferred tax assets, including those arising from unutilised tax losses, require management to assess the likelihood that the Group will generate taxable earnings in future periods, in order to utilise recognised deferred tax assets. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecast cash flows from operations and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, the ability of the Group to realise the net deferred tax assets recorded at the reporting date could be impacted.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group and the revenue can be reliably measured.

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred, which is considered to occur when title passes to the customer. This generally occurs when product is physically transferred to the buyer.

The following criteria are also met in specific revenue transactions:

Gold bullion and Copper concentrate sales

Revenue from gold bullion sales is brought to account when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the buyer and selling prices and assay results are known or can be reasonably estimated. Assay results determine content of metal in doré (gold and silver), the price of which is determined based on market quotations of each metal. Silver in doré bullions is treated as a by-product and is produced together with gold, which is the intended product and is recognised in sales revenue.

Contract terms for the Group's sale of gold, silver and copper in concentrate (metal in concentrate) allow for a price adjustment based on final assay results of the metal in concentrate to determine the final content. Recognition of sales revenue for these commodities is based on the most recently determined estimate of metal in concentrate (based on initial assay results) and the spot price at the date of shipment, with a subsequent adjustment made upon final determination and presented as part of 'Other Income'.

The terms of metal in concentrate sales contracts with third-parties contain provisional pricing arrangements whereby the selling price for metal in concentrate is based on average prevailing spot prices during a specified future period after shipment to the customer (the 'quotation period').

The provisionally priced sales of metal in concentrate contain an embedded derivative, which is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the sale of metals in concentrate and the embedded derivative is the forward contract for which the provisional sale is subsequently adjusted. Accordingly the embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is recognised at fair value, with subsequent changes in the fair value recognised in profit or loss each period until final settlement, and presented as 'Other income'. Changes in fair value over the quotation period and up until final settlement are estimated by reference to forward market prices for gold and copper.

Interest revenue

Interest revenue is recognised as it accrues, using the effective interest rate method.

Leases

The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at inception date: whether fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset.

Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense in the consolidated statement of profit or loss on a straight line basis over the lease term.

The Group had no finance leases during 2013 and 2012.

Taxation

Current and deferred income taxes

Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised.

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the consolidated statement of financial position date. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the consolidated statement of profit or loss, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity.

Deferred tax assets are not recognised in respect of temporary differences relating to tax losses where there is insufficient evidence that the asset will be recovered. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are reassessed at each consolidated statement of financial position date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.

The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the consolidated statement of profit or loss because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group's liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the consolidated statement of financial position date.

Value-added taxes ('VAT')

The Group pays VAT on purchases made in both the Republic of Azerbaijan and the UK. Under both jurisdictions, VAT paid is refundable. Azerbaijani jurisdiction permits offset of Azerbaijani VAT credit against other taxes payable to the state budget.

Transactions with related parties

For the purposes of these financial statements, parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial or operational decisions. In considering each possible related party relationship, attention is directed to the substance of the relationship, not merely the legal form.

Related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties might not and transactions between related parties may not be effected on the same terms, conditions and amounts as transactions between unrelated parties.

It is the nature of transactions with related parties that they cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's length basis.

Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs directly relating to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying capital project under construction are capitalised and added to the project cost during construction until such time the assets are considered substantially ready for their intended use i.e. when they are capable of commercial production. Where funds are borrowed specifically to finance a project, the amount capitalised represents the actual borrowing costs incurred. Where surplus funds are available for a short term out of money borrowed specifically to finance a project, the income generated from the temporary investment of such amounts is also capitalised and deducted from the total capitalised borrowing cost. Where the funds used to finance a project form part of general borrowings, the amount capitalised is calculated using a weighted average of rates applicable to relevant general borrowings of the Group during the period. All other borrowing costs are recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss in the period in which they are incurred.

Even though exploration and evaluation assets can be qualifying assets, they generally do not meet the 'probable economic benefits' test. Any related borrowing costs are therefore generally recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss in the period they are incurred.

Intangible assets

Exploration and evaluation assets

The costs of exploration properties and leases, which include the cost of acquiring prospective properties and exploration rights and costs incurred in exploration and evaluation activities, are capitalised as intangible assets as part of exploration and evaluation assets.

Exploration and evaluation assets are carried forward during the exploration and evaluation stage and are assessed for impairment in accordance with the indicators of impairment as set out in IFRS 6 'Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources'.

In circumstances where a property is abandoned, the cumulative capitalised costs relating to the property are written off in the period. No amortisation is charged prior to the commencement of production.

Once commercially viable reserves are established and development is sanctioned, exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment and transferred to 'Assets under construction'.

Upon transfer of 'Exploration and evaluation costs' into 'Assets under construction', all subsequent expenditure on the construction, installation or completion of infrastructure facilities is capitalised within 'Assets under construction'.

When commercial production commences, exploration, evaluation and development costs previously capitalised are amortised over the commercial reserves of the mining property on a units-of-production basis.

'Exploration and evaluation costs' incurred after commercial production start date in relation to evaluation of potential mineral reserves and resources that is expected to result in increase of reserves are capitalised as 'Evaluation and exploration assets' within 'intangible assets'. Once there is evidence that reserves are increased, such costs are tested for impairment and transferred to 'Producing mines'.

Mining rights

Mining rights are carried at cost to the Group less any provisions for impairments which result from evaluations and assessments of potential mineral recoveries and accumulated depletion. Mining rights are depleted on the units-of-production basis over the total reserves of the relevant area.

Other intangible assets

Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is its fair value as at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses. Internally generated intangible assets, excluding capitalised development costs, are not capitalised and expenditure is reflected in the consolidated statement of profit or loss in the year in which the expenditure is incurred. The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed as either finite or indefinite.

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life is reviewed at least at each financial year end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset is accounted for by changing the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss in the expense category consistent with the function of the intangible asset.

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. The assessment of indefinite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indefinite life continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis.

Gains or losses arising from derecognition of an intangible asset are measured as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and are recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss when the asset is derecognised.

Property, plant and equipment and mine properties

Development expenditure is net of proceeds from all but the incidental sale of ore extracted during the development phase.

Upon completion of mine construction, the assets initially charged to assets in course of construction are transferred into 'Plant and equipment' or 'Producing mines'. Items of 'Plant and equipment' and 'Producing mines' are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

During the production period expenditures directly attributable to the construction of each individual asset are capitalised as 'Assets' in course of construction up to the period when asset is ready to be put into operation. When an asset is put into operation it is transferred to 'Plant and equipment' or 'Producing mines'. Additional capitalised costs performed subsequent to the date of commencement of operation of the asset are charged directly to 'Plant and equipment' or 'Producing mine' i.e. where the asset itself was transferred.

The initial cost of an asset comprises its purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset into operation, the initial estimate of the rehabilitation obligation and, for qualifying assets, borrowing costs. The purchase price or construction cost is the aggregate amount paid and the fair value of any other consideration given to acquire the asset.

When a mine construction project moves into the production stage, the capitalisation of certain mine construction costs ceases and costs are either regarded as inventory or expensed, except for costs which qualify for capitalisation relating to mining asset additions or improvements, underground mine development or mineable reserve development.

Depreciation/amortisation

Accumulated mine development costs within producing mines are depreciated/amortised on a units-of-production basis over the economically recoverable reserves of the mine concerned, except in the case of assets whose useful life is shorter than the life of the mine, in which case the straight line method is applied. The unit of account for run of mines ('ROM') costs and for post-ROM costs are recoverable ounces of gold. The units-of-production rate for the depreciation/amortisation of mine development costs takes into account expenditures incurred to date.

The premium paid in excess of the intrinsic value of land to gain access is amortised over the life of mine.

Other plant and equipment such as mobile mine equipment is generally depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives as follows:

· Temporary buildings - eight years (2012: eight years)

· Plant and equipment - eight years (2012: eight years)

· Motor vehicles - four years (2012: four years)

· Office equipment - four years (2012: four years)

· Leasehold improvements - eight years (2012: eight years)

An item of property, plant and equipment, and any significant part initially recognised, is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in the consolidated statement of profit or loss when the asset is derecognised.

The asset's residual values, useful lives and methods of depreciation/amortisation are reviewed at each reporting period and adjusted prospectively if appropriate.

Major maintenance and repairs

Expenditure on major maintenance refits or repairs comprises the cost of replacement assets or parts of assets and overhaul costs. Where an asset or part of an asset that was separately depreciated and is now written off is replaced, and it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group through an extended life, the expenditure is capitalised.

Where part of the asset was not separately considered as a component, the replacement value is used to estimate the carrying amount of the replaced assets which is immediately written off. All other day-to-day maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Impairment of tangible and intangible assets

The Group conducts annual internal assessments of the carrying values of tangible and intangible assets. The carrying values of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure, mine properties and property, plant and equipment are assessed for impairment when indicators of such impairment exist or at least annually. In such cases an estimate of the asset's recoverable amount is calculated. The recoverable amount is determined as the higher of the fair value less costs to sell for the asset and the asset's value in use. This is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets. If this is the case, the individual assets are grouped together into cash-generating units ('CGUs') for impairment purposes. Such CGUs represent the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash flows from other assets or other groups of assets. This generally results in the Group evaluating its non-financial assets on a geographical or licence basis.

If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is impaired and an impairment loss is charged to the consolidated statement of profit or loss so as to reduce the carrying amount to its recoverable amount (i.e. the higher of fair value less cost to sell and value in use).

Impairment losses related to continuing operations are recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss in those expense categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset.

For assets excluding the intangibles referred to above, an assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the Group makes an estimate of the recoverable amount.

A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset's recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If this is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. The increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised in the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income. Impairment losses recognised in relation to indefinite life intangibles are not reversed for subsequent increases in its recoverable amount.

Provisions

General

Provisions are recognised when (a) the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event and (b) it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost.

Rehabilitation provision

The Group records the present value of estimated costs of legal and constructive obligations required to restore operating locations in the period in which the obligation is incurred. The nature of these restoration activities includes dismantling and removing structures, rehabilitating mines and tailings dams, dismantling operating facilities, closure of plant and waste sites and restoration, reclamation and re-vegetation of affected areas.

The obligation generally arises when the asset is installed or the ground/environment is disturbed at the production location. When the liability is initially recognised, the present value of the estimated cost is capitalised by increasing the carrying amount of the related mining assets to the extent that it was incurred prior to the production of related ore. Over time, the discounted liability is increased for the change in present value based on the discount rates that reflect current market assessments and the risks specific to the liability.

The periodic unwinding of the discount is recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss as a finance cost. Additional disturbances or changes in rehabilitation costs will be recognised as additions or charges to the corresponding assets and rehabilitation liability when they occur. Any reduction in the rehabilitation liability and therefore any deduction from the rehabilitation asset may not exceed the carrying amount of that asset. If it does, any excess over the carrying value is taken immediately to the consolidated statement of profit or loss.

If the change in estimate results in an increase in the rehabilitation liability and therefore an addition to the carrying value of the asset, the Group is required to consider whether this is an indication of impairment of the asset as a whole and test for impairment in accordance with IAS 36. If, for mature mines, the revised mine assets net of rehabilitation provisions exceeds the recoverable value, that portion of the increase is charged directly to expense.

For closed sites, changes to estimated costs are recognised immediately in the consolidated statement of profit or loss. Also, rehabilitation obligations that arose as a result of the production phase of a mine should be expensed as incurred.

Financial assets

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial assets within the scope of IAS 39 are classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale financial assets, or as derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. The Group determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition. All financial assets are recognised initially at fair value.

Purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within a time frame established by regulation or convention in the marketplace (regular way trades) are recognised on the trade date, i.e. the date that the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset.

The Group's financial assets include cash and short-term deposits as well as trade and other receivables.

Subsequent measurement

The subsequent measurement of financial assets depends on their classification:

Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less impairment. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fee or costs that are an integral part of the effective interest rate method. The effective interest rate method amortisation is included in finance income in the consolidated statement of profit or loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss.

Derecognition

A financial asset (or, where applicable a part of a financial asset) is derecognised when:

· The rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired;

· The Group has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation to pay the received cash flows in full without material delay to a third-party under a 'pass-through' arrangement; and either (a) the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) the Group has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.

Impairment of financial assets

The Group assesses at each consolidated statement of financial position date whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that have occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred 'loss event') and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. Evidence of impairment may include indications that the debtors or a group of debtors is experiencing significant financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation and where observable data indicate that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults.

Financial assets carried at amortised cost

For financial assets carried at amortised cost, the Group first assesses individually whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If the Group determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, it includes the asset in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and collectively assesses them for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is, or continues to be, recognised are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.

If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future expected credit losses that have not yet been incurred). The present value of the estimated future cash flows is discounted at the financial asset's original effective interest rate.

Financial liabilities

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial liabilities within the scope of IAS 39 are classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, loans and borrowings, or as derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. The Group determines the classification of its financial liabilities at initial recognition. All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and in the case of loans and borrowings, plus directly attributable transaction costs. The Group's financial liabilities include trade and other payables, contractual provisions and loans and borrowings.

Subsequent measurement

The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification as follows:

Trade and other payables and contractual provisions

Trade and other payables are initially measured at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.

Loans and borrowings

Interest-bearing loans and overdrafts are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct transaction costs. Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accrual basis and charged to the consolidated statement of profit or loss using the effective interest method. They are added to the carrying amount of the instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise.

After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Gains and losses are recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss when the liabilities are derecognised as well as through the effective interest rate method amortisation process.

Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fee or costs that are an integral part of the effective interest rate method. The effective interest rate method amortisation is included in finance cost in the consolidated statement of profit or loss.

Derecognition

A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires.

When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss.

Non-current prepayments

Advances made to suppliers for fixed asset purchases are recognised as non-current prepayments until the time when fixed assets are supplied.

Inventories

Metal in circuit consists of in-circuit material at properties with milling or processing operations and doré awaiting refinement, all valued at the lower of average cost and net realisable value. In-process inventory costs consist of direct production costs, including mining, crushing and processing; site administration costs; and allocated indirect costs, including depreciation, depletion and amortisation of producing mines and mining interests.

Ore stockpiles consist of stockpiled ore, ore on surface and crushed ore, all valued at the lower of average cost and net realisable value. Ore stockpile costs consist of direct costs, including mining, crushing and site administration costs; and allocated indirect costs, including depreciation, depletion and amortisation of producing mines and mining interests.

Inventory costs are charged to operations on the basis of ounces of gold sold. The Group regularly evaluates and refines estimates used in determining the costs charged to operations and costs absorbed into inventory carrying values based upon actual gold recoveries and operating plans.

Finished goods consists of doré bars and metal in concentrate that have been refined and assayed and are in a form that allows them to be sold on international bullion markets. Finished goods are valued at the lower of average cost and net realisable value. Finished goods costs consist of direct production costs, including mining, crushing and processing; site administration costs; and allocated indirect costs, including depreciation, depletion and amortisation of producing mines and mining interests.

Spare parts and consumables consists of consumables used in operations, such as fuel, chemicals, re-agents and spare parts, valued at the lower of average cost and replacement cost and, where appropriate, less a provision for obsolescence.

Equity instruments

Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs, or value of services received net of any issue costs.

Deferred stripping costs

The removal of overburden and other mine waste materials is often necessary during the initial development of a mine site, in order to access the mineral ore deposit. The directly attributable cost of this activity is capitalised in full within mining properties and leases, until the point at which the mine is considered to be capable of commercial production. This is classified as expansionary capital expenditure, within investing cash flows.

The removal of waste material after the point at which a mine is capable of commercial production is referred to as production stripping.

When the waste removal activity improves access to ore extracted in the current period, the costs of production stripping are charged to the income statement as operating costs in accordance with the principles of IAS 2Inventories.

Where production stripping activity both produces inventory and improves access to ore in future periods the associated costs of waste removal are allocated between the two elements. The portion which benefits future ore extraction is capitalised within stripping and development capital expenditure. If the amount to be capitalised cannot be specifically identified it is determined based on the volume of waste extracted compared with expected volume for the identified component of the orebody. Components are specific volumes of a mine's orebody that are determined by reference to the Life of Mine Plan.

In certain instances significant levels of waste removal may occur during the production phase with little or no associated production.

All amounts capitalised in respect of waste removal are depreciated using the unit of production method based on the Ore Reserves of the component of the orebody to which they relate.

The effects of changes to the Life of Mine Plan on the expected cost of waste removal or remaining reserves for a component are accounted for prospectively as a change in estimate.

Employee leave benefits

Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits and accrued but unused annual leave, are recognised in respect of employees' services up to the reporting date. They are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled.

Retirement benefit costs

The Group does not operate a pension scheme for the benefit of its employees but instead makes contributions to their personal pension policies. The contributions due for the period are charged to the consolidated statement of profit or loss.

Share-based payments

The Group has applied the requirements of IFRS 2 'Share-based Payment'. IFRS 2 has been applied to all grants of equity instruments.

The Group issues equity-settled share-based payments to certain employees. Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at fair value (excluding the effect of non-market-based vesting conditions) at the date of grant. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group's estimate of shares that will eventually vest and adjusted for the effect of non-market-based vesting conditions.

Fair value is measured by use of the Black-Scholes model. The expected life used in the model has been applied based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations. The vesting conditions assumptions are reviewed during each reporting period to ensure they reflect current expectations.

4. Segment information

The Group determines and presents operating segments based on the information that is internally provided to the Group's chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Board of Directors that makes the strategic decisions. The Board currently considers the business from a consolidated perspective and reviews the business based on the operating and exploration assets of the Group.

Based on how the business is reviewed the Group has two segments: mining operations and exploration sites. Both segments are located within the Republic of Azerbaijan. The mining operations segment is made of the Group's only producing asset, Gedabek, which accounts for all the Group's revenues, cost of sales and the majority of depreciation/amortisation.

All sales of gold and silver bullions are made to one customer, the Group's gold refinery, MKS Finance SA, based in Switzerland. Copper concentrate is sold to two customers: Seagate Minerals & Metals Inc and Glencore Xstrata International AG.

Liabilities are reviewed on a consolidated basis and therefore not reviewed separately.

5. Revenue

The Group's revenue consists of gold bullion and copper concentrate sold to the third-party customers. Revenue from sales of gold and silver content in gold bullion was US$ 63,906,406 and US$479,140 respectively (2012: US$70,931,739 and US$515,105). Revenue from sales of copper concentrate was US$6,434,362 (2012: US$2,074,545).

Finance income of US$34,221 in 2013 represents cash deposit interest received during the year (2012: US$236,438).

6. Other operating expenses and income

Other operating income relates to the income generated as a result of release of accruals/provisions during 2013 and 2012.

Other operating expenses consist of metal refining costs, foreign currency exchange loss and miscellaneous operating expenses. Foreign currency exchange loss comprised US$294,896 in 2013 (2012: nil).

7. Operating profit

There were no non-cancellable operating lease and sublease arrangements during 2013 and 2012.

The audit fees for the parent company were US$49,900 (2012: US$40,300).

8. Remuneration of Directors

Directors' fees and consultancy fees for 2013 included above were paid in cash. No gain was realised by Directors as a result of options exercising during 2013 (2012: $nil).

Directors' fees and consultancy fees for 2012 included above were paid in cash.

9. Staff numbers and costs

The average number employed by the Group (including Directors) during the year, analysed by category, was as follows:

The aggregate payroll costs of these persons were as follows:

Remuneration of key management personnel

The remuneration of the key management personnel of the Group, is set out below in aggregate:

10. Finance costs

Interest on interest-bearing loans and borrowings represents charges incurred on credit facilities with the International Bank of Azerbaijan ('IBA'), the Amsterdam Trade Bank N.V. (ATB) and Atlas Copco Customer Finance AB.

Where a portion of the loans has been used to finance the construction and purchase of assets of the Group ('qualifying assets'), the interest on that portion of the loans has been capitalised up until the time the assets were substantially ready for use. US$1,893,745 (2012: $519,776) of interest on new loans from IBA obtained for construction of the Agitation Leach Plant in Gedabek was capitalised in 2013 (note 14).

11. Taxation

Corporation tax is calculated at 32% (as stipulated in the PSA for RVIG in the Republic of Azerbaijan, the entity that contributes most significant portion of profit before tax in the Group consolidated financial statements) of the estimated assessable profit for the year. Taxation for other jurisdictions is calculated at the rates prevailing in the respective jurisdictions. Deferred income taxes arising in RVIG are recognised and fully disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. RVIG's unutilised tax losses comprised US$5,108,117 as of 31 December 2013 (2012: nil).

The major components of the income tax expenses for the year ended 31 December are:

Deferred income tax at 31 December relates to the following:

* Deferred tax assets have been recognised for the trade and other payables and provisions, asset retirement obligation and interest bearing loans and borrowings based on local tax basis differences expected to be utilised against future taxable profits.

** Deferred tax assets have been recognised for the carry-forward of unused tax losses to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available in the future against which the unused tax losses can be utilised.

* This is the local tax rate applicable in accordance with local legislation

Deferred taxation

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities have been offset for deferred taxes recognised for RVIG since there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis in the Republic of Azerbaijan.

At the balance sheet date, the Group has unused tax losses of US$15,258,788 (2012: US$7,913,323) available for offset against future profits. Unused tax losses in the Republic of Azerbaijan were US$5,108,117 (2012: nil) in 2013. No deferred tax assets have been recognised in respect of jurisdictions other than the Republic of Azerbaijan due to the uncertainty of future profit streams.

12. Earnings per share

The basic earnings per share of 0.30 cents (2012: 17.41 cents) has been based on a weighted average number of shares in issue of 111,397,307 (2012: 111,238,129) and a net profit of US$335,502 (2012: net profit of US$19,367,245).

Dilutive earnings per share of 0.30 cents for 2013 (2012: 17.26 cents) has been based on 112,233,035 (2012: 112,219,871), the weighted average number of shares determined based on the dilutive effects of 835,728 (2012: 981,742) share options exercisable as of 31 December 2013.

13. Intangible assets

Exploration and evaluation assets 

Mining rights and other intangible assets

* An amount of 621,170 ounces of recoverable gold has been used during 2013 (2012: 609,000 ounces) to determine depreciation on accumulated mining rights and other intangible assets.

Land compensation costs in the amount of $292,364 were reclassified to Producing mines within Property, Plant and Equipment during 2013(2012: nil).

14. Property, plant and equipment

* An amount of 621,170 ounces of recoverable gold has been used during 2013 (2012: 609,000 ounces) to determine depreciation on accumulated mine development costs..

Upon completion of construction and launch of Agitation Leaching Plant in June 2013, respective accumulated expenses of US$53,244,491 have been transferred from assets under construction to producing mines category of the property, plant and equipment.

As a result of the recoverable amount analysis performed during the year, no impairment losses were recognised by the Group.

The capital commitments by the Group have been disclosed in note 27.

15. Non-current prepayments

Non-current prepayments represent advances made to suppliers for fixed asset purchases.

16. Subsidiary undertakings

A list of all investments in subsidiaries, including the name, country of incorporation and proportion of ownership interest, is given in note 5 in the Company's financial statements as follows:

Anglo Asian Mining PLC is the parent and ultimate parent of the Group.

Details of all the Company's subsidiaries at 31 December 2013 are as follows:

There has been no change in the subsidiary undertakings from 2012

17. Trade receivables and other assets

The carrying amount of trade and other receivables approximates to their fair value.

The VAT refund due at 31 December 2013 and 2012 relates to VAT paid on purchases.

The gold bullion held and transferable to the Government relates to bullion held by the Group for which it owes to the Government. The Group holds the Government's share of the product from its mining activities and from time to time transfers that product to the Government. A corresponding liability to the Government is included in trade and other payables shown in note 20.

The Group does not consider any stated trade and other receivables as past due or impaired.

18. Inventories

The Group has capitalised mining costs related to low grade oxide and high grade sulphide ore stockpiled during the year. Such stockpiles are expected to be utilised as part of the heap leaching and agitation leaching process accordingly. Inventory is recognised at lower of cost or net realisable value.

US$384,096 other operating expense was recognised during 2013 for write down of unrecoverable inventory (2012: nil).

19. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and held by the Group within financial institutions that are available immediately. The carrying amount of these assets approximates their fair value.

The Group's cash on hand and cash held within financial institutions (including short-term cash deposits) comprised US$174,414 and US$5,314,359, respectively (2012: 197,842 and 2,212,888).

The Group's cash and cash equivalents are mostly held in US Dollars.

20. Trade and other payables

Trade creditors primarily comprise amounts outstanding for trade purchases and ongoing costs. Trade creditors are non‑interest‑bearing and the creditor days were 25 (2012: 24). Accruals and other payables mainly consist of accruals made for accrued but not paid salaries, bonuses, related payroll taxes and social contributions, as well as services provided but not billed to the Group by the end of reported period. The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other payables approximates to their fair value.

Amount payable to the Government from copper concentrate joint sale represents the portion of cash received from the customer for the Government's portion from the joint sale of copper concentrate.

21. Interest-bearing loans and borrowings

During 2013 the Group has withdrawn US$20,173,311 (2012: US$29,326,689) from IBA. The interest rate per the agreements is 12% per annum. Repayment of the loan principal begins after two years from the withdrawal date for each contract. The loan due to IBA has been partially repaid by the means of another loan obtained from Amsterdam Trade Bank (ATB) during 2013.

During the year the Group has signed loan agreement with ATB accessing US$37,000,000 funds for the purposes of refinancing the loan due to IBA. Interest rate per the agreement with ATB is 8.25% per annum plus 3 months LIBOR rate. According to the terms of the loan agreement with ATB, the loan principal repayments start 16 months subsequent to loan principal drawdown. Starting December 2013, the Group's cash proceeds from MKS have been accumulated on the Company's current account at ATB. The amount of cash held on current account at ATB comprised US$764,889 as of 31 December 2013. According to the terms of pledge agreement signed with ATB, the Group has pledged to ATB its present and future rights and claims against MKS, the sole buyer of the Group's gold dores until termination of the loan agreement.

US$36,629,993 was repaid by the Group to IBA in October 2013 using funds obtained from ATB. During the same year, additional repayments in the amount of US$3,095,999 have been made by the Group to IBA using operations generated funds.

During the year the Group has signed loan agreement in the amount US$3,718,790 with Atlas Copco for financing of mining equipment purchased for Gosha. The interest rate under this agreement is 8.47% per annum. During the year the Group has repaid US$1,020,395 of the loan amount.

22. Provision for rehabilitation

The Group is exposed to restoration, rehabilitation and environmental liabilities relating to its mining operations. Estimates of the cost of this work including reclamation costs, close down and pollution control are made on an ongoing basis, based on the estimated life of the mine. A new estimation was made as a result of change of expected rehabilitation works due to new plant and certain changes in production process as a result of new agitation plant. This represents the net present value of the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation to rehabilitate any environmental disturbances caused by mining operations (US$ 8,638,487 undiscounted liability for 2013 and US$ US$4,822,708 undiscounted liability for 2012, discounted using a risk free rate of 6.33% and 6.62% for 2013 and 2012, respectively, adjusted to the risks specific to liability).Expenditures on restoration and rehabilitation works are expected between 2022 and 2023.

23. Financial instruments

Financial risk management objectives and policies

The Group's principal financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, loans and letters of credit. The main purpose of these financial instruments is to finance the Group operations. The Group has other financial instruments, such as trade and other receivables and trade and other payables, which arise directly from its operations. Surplus cash within the Group is put on deposit, the objective being to maximise returns on such funds whilst ensuring that the short-term cash flow requirements of the Group are met.

The main risks that could adversely affect the Group's financial assets, liabilities or future cash flows are capital risk, market risk, interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. Management reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks which are summarised below.

The following discussion also includes a sensitivity analysis that is intended to illustrate the sensitivity to changes in market variables on the Group's financial instruments and show the impact on profit or loss and shareholders' equity, where applicable. Financial instruments affected by market risk include bank loans and overdrafts, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

The sensitivity has been prepared for the years ended 31 December 2013 and 2012 using the amounts of debt and other financial assets and liabilities held as at those reporting dates.

Capital risk management

The capital structure of the Group consists of debt, which includes the borrowings disclosed in note 21, cash and cash equivalents and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising issued share capital, reserves and retained earnings as disclosed in the consolidated statement of changes in equity. The Group has sufficient capital to fund on-going production and exploration activities, with capital requirements reviewed by the Board on a regular basis. Capital has been sourced through share issues on AIM, part of the London Stock Exchange, and loans from the IBA, ATB and other Azerbaijani banks. In managing its capital, the Group's primary objective once production has commenced is to ensure its continued ability to provide a consistent return for its equity shareholders through capital growth. In order to achieve this objective the Group seeks to maintain a gearing ratio that balances risk and returns at an acceptable level and also to maintain a sufficient funding base to enable the Group to meet its working capital and strategic investment needs.

The Group is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements other than limit for financial indebtedness with ATB which outlines that the Group will not incur financial indebtedness for more than US$30,000,000 or will obtain written prior approval from ATB. The Group monitors capital using a gearing ratio, which is net debt divided by total capital plus net debt. The Group's policy is to keep the gearing ratio below 70%. The Group includes within net debt interest-bearing loans and borrowings, less cash and cash equivalents.

Interest rate risk

The Group's cash deposits, letters of credit, borrowings and interest-bearing loans are at a fixed rate of interest except for 3 month LIBOR embedded in interest with ATB.

The Group manages the risk by maintaining fixed rate instruments, with approval from the Directors required for all new borrowing facilities.

The Group has not used any interest rate swaps or other instruments to manage its interest rate profile during 2013 and 2012.

Interest rate sensitivity analysis

Interest rate sensitivity of the Group from reasonably possible movement in 3 month LIBOR rate is limited to US$185,000 (2012: nil) negative and positive impact on the Group's profit before tax. Assumed movement is based on 0.5% increase/decrease in LIBOR on interest bearing loans from ATB.

Liquidity risk

Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board, which has built an appropriate liquidity risk management framework for the management of the Group's short, medium and long-term funding and liquidity management requirements. The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves, banking facilities and reserve borrowing facilities by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial liabilities. Included in note 21 is a description of additional undrawn facilities that the Group has at its disposal to further reduce liquidity risk.

The table below summarises the maturity profile of the Group's financial liabilities based on contractual undiscounted payments:

Year ended 31 December 2013

Year ended 31 December 2012

Credit risk

Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group. The maximum credit risk exposure relating to financial assets is represented by their carrying value as at the consolidated statement of financial position date.

The Group has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy banks and has cash deposits held with reputable financial institutions. Trade receivables consist of amounts due to the Group from sales of gold and silver. All sales of gold-silver bullions are made to MKS Finance SA, a Switzerland based gold refinery, and copper concentrates to Seagate Minerals and Metals and Glencore International AG. Due to the nature of the customers, the Board does not feel that a significant credit risk exists for receipt of revenues. The Board continually reviews the possibilities of selling gold to alternative customers and also the requirement for additional measures to mitigate any potential credit risk.

Foreign currency risk

The presentational currency of the Group is US Dollars. The Group is exposed to currency risk due to movements in foreign currencies relative to the US Dollar affecting foreign currency transactions and balances.

The carrying amounts of the Group's foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at the reporting date are as follows:

Foreign currency sensitivity analysis

The Group is mainly exposed to the currency of the United Kingdom (UK Sterling), the currency of the European Union (EURO) and the currency of the Republic of Azerbaijan (Azerbaijan Manats).

The following table details the Group's sensitivity to a 7.50%, 9.41% and 1.37% (2012: 8.85%, 10.62% and 3.82%) increase and decrease in the US Dollar against UK sterling, Euro and Azerbaijani manat, respectively. These are the sensitivity rates used when reporting foreign currency risk internally to key management personnel and represents management's assessment of the reasonably possible change in foreign exchange rates. The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign currency denominated monetary items and adjusts their translation at the period end for respective change in foreign currency rates. A positive number below indicates an increase in profit and other equity where the US Dollar strengthens by mentioned rates against the relevant currency. Weakening of the US Dollar against the relevant currency, there would be an equal and opposite impact on the profit and other equity, and the balances below would be reversed.

Market risk

The Group's activities primarily expose it to the financial risks of changes in gold, silver and copper prices which have a direct impact on revenues. The Board monitors both the spot and forward price of these regularly and now that production is becoming more reliable will review the possibility of using forward contracts and derivative financial instruments to manage this risk.

A 10% decrease in gold price would result in a reduction in revenue of US$6,390,778 and a 10% increase in gold prices would have the equal and opposite effect. A 10% decrease in silver price would result in a reduction in revenue of US$47,914 and a 10% increase in silver prices would have an equal and opposite effect. A 10% decrease in copper price would result in a reduction in revenue of US$448,421 and a 10% increase in copper prices would have an equal and opposite effect.

24. Equity

Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry the right to dividends.

Share options

The Group has share option scheme under which options to subscribe for the Company's shares have been granted to certain Executives and senior employees (note 26).

Merger reserve

The merger reserve was created in accordance with the merger relief provisions under Section 612 of the Companies Act 2006 (as amended) relating to accounting for Group reconstructions involving the issue of shares at a premium. In preparing Group consolidated financial statements, the amount by which the base value of the consideration for the shares allotted exceeded the aggregate nominal value of those shares was recorded within a merger reserve on consolidation, rather than in the share premium account.

Retained earnings / (accumulated loss)

Retained earnings / (accumulated loss) represent the cumulative profit/(loss) of the Group attributable to the equity shareholders.

25. Notes to the cash flow statement

26. Share-based payments

Equity-settled share options

The Group operates a share option scheme for Directors and senior employees of the Group. Options are granted at a price agreed at the time of the grant. The vesting periods are up to three years. Options are exercisable at a price equal to the closing quoted market price of the Group's shares on the date of the Board approval to grant options. Options are forfeited if the employee leaves the Group and the options are not exercised within three months from leaving date. Details of the share options outstanding during the year are as follows:

The options outstanding at 31 December 2013 had a weighted average exercise price of 38 pence (ranging from 11.5 pence to 97 pence) and a weighted average remaining contractual life of five years. 50,000 options (2012: 350,000 options) were granted in 2013. The aggregate of the estimated fair values of the options granted during 2013 is £5,445 (US$8,517) (2012: £46,943 or US$76,107).

The inputs into the Black-Scholes model are as follows:

Expected volatility was determined by calculating the historical volatility of the Company's share price over the previous one and two years for share options with one and two years vesting periods, respectively. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.

The weighted average fair value of options granted on 10 December 2013 is £0.11 (US$0.18).

Total share-based payment expense recognised by the Group

The Group recognised total expenses of US$45,375 and US$95,647 related to equity-settled share-based payment transactions in 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Shared based payment charges for options forfeited during 2013 of the amount of US$42,450 (2012: nil) were reclassified from share-based payment reserve to retained earnings.

No shared based payment charges for options exercised incurred during 2013 (2012: US$12,566).

The cumulative amount recognised in equity relating to share-based payments at the consolidated statement of financial position date was US$734,794 (2012: US$731,870).

27. Contingencies and commitments

The Group undertakes its mining operations in the Republic of Azerbaijan pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement on the Exploration, Development and Production Sharing for the Prospective Gold Mining Areas: Gedabek, Gosha, Ordubad Group (Piazbashi, Agyurt, Shakardara, Kiliyaki), Soutely, Kyzilbulag and Vejnali Deposits dated 20 August 1997 (the 'PSA'). The PSA contains various provisions relating to the obligations of the R.V. Investment Group Services LLC ('RVIG'), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, with regards to the exploration and development programme, preparation and timely submission of reports to the Government, compliance with environmental and ecological requirements, etc. The Directors believe that RVIG is in compliance with the requirements of the PSA. The Group has announced a discovery on Gosha Mining Property in February 2011 and submitted the development programme to the Government according to the PSA requirements, which was approved in 2012. In April 2012 the Group announced a discovery on the Ordubad Group of Mining Properties and submitted the development programme to the Government for review and approval according to the PSA requirements.

The mining licence on Gedabek expires in March 2022, with the option to extend the licence by ten years conditional upon satisfaction of certain requirements stipulated in the PSA.

RVIG is also required to comply with the clauses contained in the PSA relating to environmental damage. The Directors believe RVIG is substantially in compliance with the environmental clauses contained in the PSA.

Based on pledge agreement signed on 24 July 2013 the Group is a guarantor for one of its suppliers Azerinterpartlayish-X MMC for loan taken from IBA in amount of US$500,000 for 36 months.

There were no significant operating lease or capital lease commitments at 31 December 2013 (2012: nil).

28. Related party transactions

Trading transactions

During the years 2013 and 2012, there were no trading transactions between Group companies.

Other related party transactions

Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Transactions between the Group and other related parties are disclosed below.

a) Mr Reza Vaziri retains an indirect interest in the lease of the office in Baku, the Republic of Azerbaijan. The cost of the lease in the year was US$93,752 (2012: US$93,616);

b) Shares issued to Directors are disclosed in the Directors' Report;

c) Remunerations paid to Directors are disclosed in note 8;

d) Total payments in amount of US$2,589,000 (2012: US$786,181) were made for equipment and spare parts purchased from Proses Muhendislik Danismanlik Inshaat ve Tasarim Anonim Shirket, the entity in which the Chief Technical Officer of Azerbaijan International Mining Company has a direct ownership interest.

There is US$65,857 advance payment at year-end in relation to the above related party transaction (2012: US$319,906).

e) Advance payments due from the Group's Chief Financial Officer which are subject to an annual interest rate of 12%, comprised US$178,106 as at 31 December 2013 (2012: US$ 138,527). Following the resignation of the Group CFO the advances are due for immediate repayment, a staged repayment agreement is being considered and documented. Reza Vaziri has provided a personal financial guarantee should the Group CFO default on the agreed capital and interest payment programme.

All of the above transactions were made on arms-length terms.

29. Subsequent events

The following subsequent events relate to the period from 31 December 2013 to the date of approval of the consolidated financial statements on 20 May 2014.

The Company obtained US$1,025,000 short-term loan from Yapi Kredi Bank at the annual interest rate of 16% on 9 January 2014 and fully repaid it on 21 January 2014.

The Company obtained US$640,000 short-term loan from Yapi Kredi Bank at the annual interest rate of 16% on 18 March 2014 and fully repaid it on 14 May 2014.

In April 2014 the Group has signed a three-year sales contract with Industrial Minerals S.A., a Geneva based integrated trading, mining and logistics group, for the latter's appointment as the Group's exclusive partner for sales of copper concentrate produced on Gedabek mine.

In May 2014 Mr. Reza Vaziri provided the Group with a short-term interest-free loan in the amount of US$200,000 due August 2014. In addition the Group has obtained credit line facility from IBA in the amount of US$1,500,000 in May, which was partially used. Credit line is provided at the annual interest rate of 12% and due within six months.

For further information please visit www.angloasianmining.com or contact:

Competent Persons

Mr. Sean Muller has reviewed and approved the technical information contained in this announcement. Mr. Muller is a Competent Person under JORC deposits of the type of Gedabek since 1983 and Gosha since the early 1990s. He has been involved in major gold discoveries that have gone into production since 1973. This experience, together with membership in AIPG since 1985, and Registered Member status with Society of Mining Engineers qualifies Mr. Muller as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves' and a 'qualified person' as defined in the Note for Mining and Oil & Gas Companies published by the London Stock Exchange in June 2009.

Glossary

**ENDS**