Member Info for ZzTop1

I repeat, work together, let it slide

Thanks Richken for the timely post...

Don't get triggered and please allow the rubbish to move down the board. AlwaysBashing has very thick skin despite having his pants pulled down regularly, your words make no difference to him. He'll be delighted with 1000 replies to his rubbish.

We're still of positive mindset. News on all fronts is very very close.

Tomorrow's SP action could be testing for some but unless our belief that the expected gold standard tests have suddenly just nose dived in accuracy over the weekend then nought's changed

Based on previous emergency approvals, its a 4 week turnaround

An extract from: https://www.moodiedavittreport.com/heathrow-to-share-covid-19-testing-data-to-help-revive-travel/

"Heathrow’s own trials will feed into the Government’s findings after being independently evaluated by a subgroup of academics that are part of CONDOR. It is hoped that these findings will then be used to support the recovery across sectors.

CONDOR is working to accelerate the real-world use of COVID-19 diagnostics and their findings will help to identify the most accurate testing methods. Results of the study are being sent to the Department for Health and Social Care to support the decision making process."

My thoughts are around having already been accepted onto Condor would this still allow us to be a part of independent trials? The second paragraph says it all for me - If this is about Condor comparing tests to see which is most accurate then we're already at the party.

Nice post CS. I hope you're right.

Either way, we're both expecting an initial RNS with LSTM S&S validation results. I'm seeing it as the next inflection point.

Off topic - on the Heathrow test, I believe Avacta lfd could not have been chosen for the independent trial. Why go through the side door into Condor when we've already walked through the front door?

Gla, interesting week ahead and please don't feed Always.

Alwaysbashing putting some work in early on the bank holiday I see. Spread fear today and setup a short first thing tomorrow morning: easy money!

LSTM not LTSM :)

Good question CaptainStanley, I was thinking the same thing this morning and following a little research I've concluded that LTSM clinical validation won't be used towards Condor validation.

LTSM is lab based and Condor is all about validation of tests in the Primary or Secondary care setting (Falcon & Raptor). Easy conclusion, LTSM is not a real world setting like Condor so results won't be used towards Condor.

The next question I have is whether LTSM and Condor validations are running concurrently.

In the 7th August RNS we have:
LSTM is currently evaluating the performance of prototype lateral flow tests provided by Cytiva alongside Avacta's ELISA laboratory test using SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus samples, as a precursor to full clinical validation studies.

What are these full clinical validation studies? I'm assuming this is a reference to Condor and my definition of precursor is something that comes ahead of something of the same kind. This does not necessarily factor out concurrent testing although there will of course be a time lag for BBI to get the tests to Condor.

The LTSM lab based validation is all about speed to get the test to market. Also from the same RNS we have:
Dr Lisa Baldwin, Business Development Manager, LSTM commented:

"The partnership between Avacta and LSTM exemplifies the role of the LSTM in translational work to advance products to market and we are pleased to be working with Avacta on this coronavirus antigen test."

LTSM have access to many patient samples and is as we know lab based which of course will be far quicker than tests being run in a care setting. Based on Dr Lisa's additions to the RNS on advancing products to marker, my take on this is following successful validation by LTSM, this should be enough evidence to start full manufacturing and to start formally putting deals in place.

I believe we will get an initial RNS which provides S&S findings based on LTSM lab based validations.

If LTSM is all about speed then I'm hoping for and expecting an RNS to drop this week. Bams and LTSM RNS's cold drop in quick succession.

Apologies RK, you've just confirmed you are buying. Good luck with you investment choices

1. There's another pregnancy style saliva test being developed. Look hard enough, it's not new news. Summary = No big deal

2. Richken is probably selling a few shares first thing Tuesday. He never said he would be buying more shares soon, he just states he's doubling up. Summary = So what?!

Go enjoy the rest of the weekend with friends and family, this bb ain't going anywhere. Gla.

AS has said previously that he's in discussion with other manufacturing partners so going for a No on the first question.

100% yes on the will Avacta sell every test

Anyone watch the Dubois fight last night and the Frank Warren interview following the fight? He said the government will confirm whether the Dubois Vs Joyce fight can go ahead 24th Oct at a packed O2 arena within the next 7 days. No fans, no fight... Can mass screening at a large event start within the next 8 weeks? I hope so.

Thanks AfamaMan, I and I'm sure all those invested would love to see a minimum 5x from here and I suspect many would take 3x and even 2x to start off with would be nice.

We have to keep in mind that the share price is volatile and can move quickly either way. So let's imagine a scenario where next Tuesday the SP goes down 25% to approx 125p. I won't be losing any sleep. If Bams, LFD, SKIN news takes us to only 2x from there in the next month then 250p is still a great platform for further growth through the rest of 2020 and beyond. Whatever your strategy, don't panic especially so close to the good news flow we're all expecting. Gla.

Found this a little earlier: https://as.nyu.edu/content/nyu-as/as/departments/physics/news/COVID-HPC.html

Fair to say that we may not hear on progress on the 5h1t test until after 15th September, the date for the Integumen GM?

Like your posts Pellegrino although let's wait and see the first part of your prediction on serious FOMO today. I'll take that for starters, not banking on it. Gla.

Time to let other threads move down the page.. Here's a quick read which for me helps explain why Klaus has taken the time to optimize the lft:

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/fast-isnt-always-better-experts-worry-about-rise-of-rapid-covid-19-testing

Alwaysbashing, you have been ridiculed and had your pants pulled down today. Deservedly so as you continue to argue despite the fact that you only claim to own 2000 shares.

Your time here on this board does not align with your supposed investment whilst you continue vehemently to only provide negative thoughts. You can not be trusted and therefore hold no influence. Not a single bit of research or piece of evidence to back your negativity. And we heard you the first time on the rampers. AlwaysHasToBeRight, goodnight! (Where's Mapp gone? )