Member Info for ZYX098

It isn't acceptable for Rampers to post their lies as fact - which is why I call them out on it, if you'd bothered to read any of my posts.

But equally I don't feel the need to post the same thing repeatedly every day, or abuse other posters, or demand that other posters justify why UKOG's share price has dropped 0.001p in a day.

Indeed, from the way that you and HmmmNice post, it's almost as if you've both lost a ton of money on UKOG (at least HmmmNice admitted it in his first post) and you have certainly been here under other ID's before, because you came on knowing a lot more than a newbie poster.

Playing the victim card and complaining about the LSE giving you a temporary ban puts you in the same league as Adrian.

Although I find it odd that you must have known the ban was coming, since on Thursday you wished everyone a good weekend - which didn't stop you posting on Friday either...

"My work here is done until Monday.

Adrian can post all weekend for all I care, come Monday he'll be gone again.

Good weekend to everyone."

Adrian and his nonsense was easy to deal with, but between you and HmmmNice, you have managed to turn this board into a very toxic environment for everyone.

But your request is granted - you & HmmmNice are in the filter bin.

I know - I get abused often enough by the Ramptastic crew.

But did you ever stop to think that it wasn't just the Rampers who are tired of your incessant posting of the same thing over and over again?

Don't worry - you didn't miss anything and you weren't missed.

Adrian,

I am not on Twitter (or whatever it's called this week), so have no idea what anyone posts unless a link is provided.

If you'd bothered to pay attention, I have called out HmmmNice on his posts here, as they are puerile and add nothing to this board - just like you, actually.

Although with slightly better syntax.

BTW, you already know I'm a LTH here, and I've always been open about being down on my holding, but probably not by as much as you are on your buys at 0.18p, 0.06p, 0.05p, 0.0329p and 0.0327p.

You can claim I'm a basher all you want - history shows that my track record of explaining what UKOG had been up to, and the difference between what they claim and what is really going, on is way, way more accurate than yours.

Which shouldn't be a surprise as you are a fire extinguisher salesman and I run Rigs for a living.

A simple example; your claim that UKOG would bag when the result of the Loxley Court Case was announced.

It didn't.

Just the same as it won't bag when the SC result is announced, as we all know that your beloved Sarah's case will fail, so the result is already built into the share price.

And as much as you try and play the 'victim' card, the simple truth is that you have a lifetime ban from LSE for abusing and threatening other posters.

The clue is in "lifetime ban".

So if you continually return to the board by using a VPN to create a fake ID, make all kinds of lies up about other posters who you don't agree with, sometimes (like today) spamming the board endlessly with nonsense post after nonsense post, then you shouldn't cry like a little baby when you get tossed off this board.

Again.

Adrian,

The only one suggesting that the Court Case has held up developments at HH is you.

There's a difference between "story" and "facts".

You should look it up and see who it is making up a story here.

Clue: It's not me....

Adrian,

Still posting the same thing again?

I can still do that too:

Adrian,

You claim that your beloved Sarah’s Court Cases have held up work at HH, and yet:

From the “Sarah Finch cas decision expected very soon” thread, at 22:59hrs yesterday you posted

“Planning consent remains in force and lawful production continues at the Horse Hill site in which the Company holds an 85.635% interest.”

So planning consent does indeed remain in force according to your own post.

And UKOG’s own RNS statements also give lie to your claim that they are being held up by the SC Case;

RNS of 23rd Feb 2023

UK Oil & Gas PLC (London AIM: UKOG) is pleased to announce that, as a necessary precursor to its planned Horse Hill-2z ("HH-2z") Portland formation water reinjection project, the Company has now installed three, shallow, groundwater monitoring boreholes at its 85.635% owned producing oil field.

RNS of 15th August 2022

Preparatory work towards converting HH-2z into a produced saline water reinjector continues.

But then again, you never have let those pesky things called facts get in the way of your claims in the past, have you?

See? It's called "copy and paste" - so easy even a 12 year old child can do it....

Adrian,

In case you'd forgotten, I'm still waiting....

Oh, that's right.

You hadn't forgotten - you were just trying to ignore it because you can't find any of my posts where I've actually bullied you.....

Adrian,

Posting the same thing again?

I can do that too:

Adrian,

You claim that your beloved Sarah’s Court Cases have held up work at HH, and yet:

From the “Sarah Finch cas decision expected very soon” thread, at 22:59hrs yesterday you posted

“Planning consent remains in force and lawful production continues at the Horse Hill site in which the Company holds an 85.635% interest.”

So planning consent does indeed remain in force according to your own post.

And UKOG’s own RNS statements also give lie to your claim that they are being held up by the SC Case;

RNS of 23rd Feb 2023

UK Oil & Gas PLC (London AIM: UKOG) is pleased to announce that, as a necessary precursor to its planned Horse Hill-2z ("HH-2z") Portland formation water reinjection project, the Company has now installed three, shallow, groundwater monitoring boreholes at its 85.635% owned producing oil field.

RNS of 15th August 2022

Preparatory work towards converting HH-2z into a produced saline water reinjector continues.

But then again, you never have let those pesky things called facts get in the way of your claims in the past, have you?

See? It's called "copy and paste" - so easy even a 12 year old child can do it....

Adrian,

That's the fourth time you've posted this.

Your posting it over and over again doesn't mean it's going to come true.

In fact, given your strike rate when it comes to making predictions, the opposite is far more likely to be the case....

Adrian,

The only one suggesting that the Court Case has held up developments at HH is you.

There's a difference between "story" and "facts".

You should look it up and see who it is making up a story here.

Clue: It's not me....

O.K., Adrian, I challenge you to post anything of mine where I have bullied you.

Go on I'll wait.

But I'll be waiting a long time.....

Adrian,

You claim that your beloved Sarah’s Court Cases have held up work at HH, and yet:

From the “Sarah Finch cas decision expected very soon” thread, at 22:59hrs yesterday you posted

“Planning consent remains in force and lawful production continues at the Horse Hill site in which the Company holds an 85.635% interest.”

So planning consent does indeed remain in force according to your own post.

And UKOG’s own RNS statements also give lie to your claim that they are being held up by the SC Case;

RNS of 23rd Feb 2023

UK Oil & Gas PLC (London AIM: UKOG) is pleased to announce that, as a necessary precursor to its planned Horse Hill-2z ("HH-2z") Portland formation water reinjection project, the Company has now installed three, shallow, groundwater monitoring boreholes at its 85.635% owned producing oil field.

RNS of 15th August 2022

Preparatory work towards converting HH-2z into a produced saline water reinjector continues.

But then again, you never have let those pesky things called facts get in the way of your claims in the past, have you?

Don't worry Adrian - we have many screen shots of your vile abusive bullying posts under your previous ID's.

Oh, wait - that's not what you meant, is it?

You mean 100/1 consolidation, right?

Don't forget the 'oil sample' actually came up as an emulsion and they had to use an emulsion breaker on the sample to get that photograph.

As to doing a redrill, they'd have no excuse to not run E-logs over the 'payzone', unlike last time - and UKOG probably don't want to do that, as it would give a definitive answer.

Speaking of E-Logs, did they ever release the results of the 'specialist' log interpretation - which should have been available within a couple of days?

OH testing in those types of formations is always tricky - compounded here by the potential length of zone to be tested and the shallow depth.

Better to drill 8 1/2" hole through it, run E-Logs and set & cement 7" casing. Then test using the 4 1/2" perf guns that we know are available.

Vernonya,

The World market for EV's powered by Hydrogen fuel cells will dwarf that of battery powered EV's. It's the way we should be going in the UK, using Hydrogen generated by excess wind power (we paid over £1 Billion in capacity constraint payments to wind farms last year).

The long distance trucks that Africa, the Americas, Asia and Australia rely on will never be powered by a conventional EV's - these are places where they cannot keep the lights on 24/7, never mind put in place generation and distribution capacity for vehicles.

Look at the number of trucks on the road in the UK - same thing.

I know Tesla did a big splash about having an EV truck that did 500 miles recently, but what they didn't say was that they needed special permission from the US Govt to run it over the 84klbs kerb weight allowed (apparently it was just over 100klbs) and the actual freight weight was just 1 ton.

They also claimed a 30 min recharge time. What they didn't say was that the recharge system was 4,000 Amps.

Let me say that again - FOUR THOUSAND Amps.

Never mind the sheer impossibility of any grid handling that load, if you have a pacemaker or a hip implant or carrying anything metallic while standing next to it - well, that's a big problem.

The Hydrogen for the fuel celled EV's in those places will be spot generated by a system that was developed several years ago by Shell, HM Govt and Toyota. It fits in a shipping container and just needs water and electricity (which can be grid, PV or Wind, or a combination).

Refuelling times are the same as for an ICE - and that's the huge advantage. These long distance lorries have two drivers - they pull into a small village, one driver starts refuelling while the other goes to eat, they swap places until the tanks are full and then they carry on going.

The scenario you paint in your last paragraph simply cannot happen - any leaking Hydrogen will dissipate far too quickly.

Besides, the automatic safety systems wouldn't allow a slow leak - as soon as they detect any leak at all, they are designed to automatically vent the entire tank to atmosphere - typical discharge time is just one second. If it did so while parked in a closed garage, by the time the owner heard the alarm, got to the garage and switched the light on, the H2 will have gone - it dissipates that fast.

Everyone points to the Hindenburg - apart from the fact that the paint they used on the skin was very combustible, people forget that the majority of people who died were killed by the fire caused by the diesel tanks rupturing when it hit the ground. The Hydrogen had already been burned off (it's going upwards in the first few seconds of the film of the crash).

Presumably you are not aware that Hydrogen powered cars, buses and Lorries have been used in the UK for several years? Experimental Hydrogen powered trains are even being used by ScotRail.

Just pointing out that you and Adrian really aren't all that different.

If you think I'm trying to act as the Board Sheriff, I suggest you look in the mirror to see one of those who actually is trying....

HN / SS,

I give Adrian grief for hurling insults, petty name calling, using emojis which make him look like a 12 year old child and for adding nothing to this board.

Quite honestly, you two are really no different.

Calling other posters "Oceflop", "Peehole" and "Ppoo" aren't clever or funny, and in reality just drag you down to Adrian's level.

We can all see the share price and what it's doing - no need to post a link to it (after all, it's on the top of this page....) and demand that another poster justify something they have no control over.

Adrian is down at the level of the gutter - there's no need for anyone else to join him there.

Hmmm, if Mr 2p/5p has suddenly turned up and is posting "news" that is several years old, it must mean that a P&D is being lined up for Monday.

I said at the time that that colour of the water indicated that they'd had to use an emulsion breaker on it.

A certain fire extinguisher salesman and a (vals)expert said I was talking nonsense (except they use stronger language...).

It wasn't until much later that UKOG admitted that it was a sample of emulsion returned while running the 9 5/8" casing.

Which shouldn't have been a surprise, as that was what happened on the Kezer-1 Water Well, which - as a reminder - is on the crest of the Pin-1 structure.