Member Info for zumore

I was looking for a particular "Helpful's" post the other week (but i couldn't find it) in regards to him talking about he and his mates holding over 30% in ALR. However here it is when i reposted it in Aug 2023:

Helpful's 17 June 2023 post:

"with regard to production bbb does this all the time comes out with something which is then rebutted and then restates the same issue differently a few days later.

so people understand, i own 10.262% of alr and with two mates just over 30% when ab refers to outside investors, it is us. alr, lac minerals and faso were to put together with my encouragement and undertaking what we would co-invest. we have a position in faso too and will likely fund cote d'ivoire now the first licence has been issued.

in each case, the plan has been and will be to get to production as quickly as possible and cheaply as possible so neither rrr or we have to fund it on an ongoing basis. for each there are two ways forward, lots of analysis, lots of drilling and spending a lot of money over several years or just find something that can be exploited and get on with it.

that is what is being applied at tin hill. the site is near to harare, which is about an hour away by road. in harare there are plenty of contractors to supply skilled labour, diggers, dumpers, grinders etc. in fact, everything that is needed at tin hill except the flotation tanks needed for beneficiation, which would need to be ordered or bought second hand.

so the plan is for pretty much all of the doings at tin hill to be done by contractors and supervised by our people on the ground; bashile and julian plus a couple of others. it is going to come down to how fast the contracts can be agreed, signed and contractors get on site. once they are on-site, production will start. the illegal miners have helped us; they have already removed over burden on part of the site and exposed the mineralised pegmatite and extracted some of the spodumene. the stockpile (it is actually physically more than one stockpile as in where they have dumped the extracted spodumene) is substantial and will take several days to shift once sold. so hopefully, the contractors are on site this week coming or maybe the week after. i don't see that it makes much difference and it is not a ****up but merely down to the contractors ability to get on site.

once the stockpile is sold alr will not need any more external capital and should pretty quickly be able to make distributions to us and to rrr.

tin hill is only one asset in alr. once all the paperwork is dealt with alr might have several licences and once cash flow has started be able to do more deals elsewhere.

imho alr is worth several times rrr's market capitalisation even applying a discount for zimbabwe. i expect that rrr will put out a detailed presentation for alr fairly soon but the priority is getting into production not producing pretty pictures.

dyor"

Banbury in my last post i sloppily put all the things together that i thought should have been promptly RNS'd because they to me looked price sensitive events.

From the Red Rock 2020 Final results RNS here is the RRR coal extracts and dates. I cannot see Red Rock RNS's around the below dates that make those announcements and to me that looks price sensitive news because if Red Rock had RNS'd the below news then i have no doubt it would have affected the RRR share price.

From 2020 final results RNS

"On 11 April 2019, the Company's 100% owned subsidiary, RRR Coal Ltd, agreed a loan facility of up to US$1.0 million with Riverfort Global Opportunities PCC Ltd and YA II PN Ltd. The terms of the loan call for US$0.400 million to be transferred to the borrower, with additional tranches available to the Company at the lenders' absolute discretion. The notes are secured by 5,500,000 shares in Jupiter Mines Ltd, which were transferred from the Company to the borrowers as well as by a corporate guarantee executed by Red Rock Resources Plc. The Notes carry an interest rate of 10% and come with a 7.5% implementation fee and are repayable over a period ending in April 2020.

On 21 January 2020, the Company's 100% owned subsidiary, RRR Coal Ltd, agreed a final drawdown from the loan facility of up to US$1.0 million with Riverfort Global Opportunities PCC Ltd and YA II PN Ltd of a gross amount of US$0.2 million. The notes remained secured by 5,500,000 shares of Jupiter Mines Ltd, as well as by a corporate guarantee executed by Red Rock Resources Plc. The notes carry an interest rate of 10% and this drawdown carried an implementation fee of US$7,000. All outstanding amounts from all previous drawdowns including this drawdown were refinanced and now became repayable in equal instalments from April 2020 to January 2021.

After the year-end, on 6 November 2020, the Company's 100% owned subsidiary, RRR Coal Ltd, refinanced its existing loan facility with Riverfort Global Opportunities PCC Ltd and YA II PN Ltd, increasing the total amount available for draw-down to US$2.0 million, and drawing down an initial gross amount of US$1.0 million with additional tranches available at the lenders' absolute discretion. The notes are secured on 6,302,000 shares in Jupiter Mines Ltd as well as 20,000,000 shares in Power Metal Resources Plc, which were transferred from the Company to an escrow account for the duration of the loan, as well as by a corporate guarantee executed by Red Rock Resources Plc. The notes carry an interest rate of 10% and come with a 7.5% implementation fee and are repayable over a six-month period starting in June 2021. "

If you look at the 2020 RRR final results RNS you will see mention of Red Rock's 100% owned subsidiary RRR coal taking out loan facilities with Riverfort. However look at the dates mentioned then try to find RNS's around those dates you will not find them. This is strange because you would think that would be price sensitive news and Red Rock would immediately have to RNS the market.

Then again when Red Rock loaned Steelmin over £1 million this wasn't promptly RNS'd. When Red Rock loaned Amulet diamonds a few hundred thousand that also wasn't promptly RNS'd. Bizarrely Red Rock also loaned just under £300,000 to Regency mines former coal partners Legacy hill resources but that also wasn't RNS'd to the market. You would have thought all three would be price sensitive information and therefore promptly RNS'd to the market. Though some time later all three were later mentioned in a final results RNS when all three amounts were written off.

Even when Red Rock sold all its Jupiter shares, over a year later it still showed on the Red Rock website that they still owned those shares.

You would like to think a company's RNS's and website would keep investors right up to date with what's happening with a company. Unfortunately with Red Rock that is not the case.

I'm sorry everyone but i'm bumping my post so Andrew Bell can give me a reply. 😐

"Firstly i know some will moan "are you kidding me. You are bringing up an RNS from almost 18 years ago?"

Yes i am. 😕

I was looking at the interims from 31 March 2006 and the then and now Chairman Andrew Bell was giving shareholders a rundown of what happened in the first few months of trading on AIM for Red Rock.

"The half year to December saw the listing of the company's shares on the AIM market on 29th July 2005.

27,300,000 shares were placed at 2p per share to raise a net £476,000. With 141,860,000 shares in issue.

The stock price closed its first day of trading at 2.5 pence, valuing the company at £3.54m.

Between listing and the year end, the shares traded within the range 2.25p and 2.88p."

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/RRR/interim-results-bwzhrico8j8tdv1.html

....

So now 30Jan 2024, todays share price is 0.075p or around 1/13th of a penny. However at the end of 2015 RRR did a 25-1 share consolidation, so if we reverse that 25-1 share consolidation then this share price today would be around 1/330th of a penny. So with no share consolidation the share price today would be around 825 times smaller than the 2.5p it closed on its first day of trading.

...

If we also reverse the 2015 share consolidation then todays almost 3.34 billion shares in issue would become around 83.5 billion shares in issue.

So after its first day of trading Red Rock had 141,86 million shares in issue. With no share consolidation there would now be around 83.5 billion shares in issue. So that would mean around 600 times more share would be in issue than its first day of trading.

......

The absolute beauty of Red Rock that in a way makes it pure and incredibly easy for would be investors to determine whether Red Rock is a good company or not, is that Andrew Bell has been the Red Rock chairman and been in charge of running the company for all its 19 years listed on AIM.

So i come back to my subject question isn't it astonishing that even though this chairman as absolutely decimated this share price with his company decisions that 19 years on he still somehow remains in charge at Red Rock?"

Banbury, that Stephen Lundy post you talk about was 5 Dec 11.35am:

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=RRR&share=Red-Rock-Resources&page=11

Firstly i know some will moan "are you kidding me. You are bringing up an RNS from almost 18 years ago?"

Yes i am. 😕

I was looking at the interims from 31 March 2006 and the then and now Chairman Andrew Bell was giving shareholders a rundown of what happened in the first few months of trading on AIM for Red Rock.

"The half year to December saw the listing of the company's shares on the AIM market on 29th July 2005.

27,300,000 shares were placed at 2p per share to raise a net £476,000. With 141,860,000 shares in issue.

The stock price closed its first day of trading at 2.5 pence, valuing the company at £3.54m.

Between listing and the year end, the shares traded within the range 2.25p and 2.88p."

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/RRR/interim-results-bwzhrico8j8tdv1.html

....

So now 16 Jan 2024, todays share price is 0.075p or around 1/13th of a penny. However at the end of 2015 RRR did a 25-1 share consolidation, so if we reverse that 25-1 share consolidation then this share price today would be around 1/330th of a penny. So with no share consolidation the share price today would be around 825 times smaller than the 2.5p it closed on its first day of trading.

...

If we also reverse the 2015 share consolidation then todays almost 3.34 billion shares in issue would become around 83.5 billion shares in issue.

So after its first day of trading Red Rock had 141,86 million shares in issue. With no share consolidation there would now be around 83.5 billion shares in issue. So that would mean around 600 times more share would be in issue than its first day of trading.

......

The absolute beauty of Red Rock that in a way makes it pure and incredibly easy for would be investors to determine whether Red Rock is a good company or not, is that Andrew Bell has been the Red Rock chairman and been in charge of running the company for all its 19 years listed on AIM.

So i come back to my subject question isn't it astonishing that even though this chairman as absolutely decimated this share price with his company decisions that 19 years on he still somehow remains in charge at Red Rock?

Specinvestor, i know in the past you have been skeptical about how much these share threads have on influencing a share price. However look on the HE1 thread and look at how many people descend on a thread when a full on ramp is on.

Over the years i've seen many AIM companies multibag in a day based purely on some influencial ramper pumping the stock. In the past ramper "topinfo" has done this on many ocassions.

So i'm convinced without these share forums AIM companies like Red Rock would quickly fold. Without these threads how would "Helpful" try to ramp this company?

Helpful, you have a strange definition of what a troll is.

Many posters on this thread are like "danger signs" helpfully pointing out the dangers. Conversely you are the equivilent of a "danger sign remover".

I have no idea of how to repost a screenshot but in the two tweets that RRR posted then later deleted from 16-17 Nov, this is exactly what was said in those deleted tweets.

The 1 photo Red Rock tweet that showed numerous small looking 1 ton bags. It was later discovered to be a lie by Red Rock because it wasn't ALR/RRR lithium ore but an old marketing photo.

RRR tweet said:

"Some of our lithium ore bagged up in 1 ton bags ready for shipment"

.............

3 photo Red Rock tweet. Two of which were not real.

RRR tweet said:

"RRR lithium project Zimbabwe 📷 (A camera cartoon similar to this)

Lithium ore material ready for export, before loading

#RRR #Lithium # Zimbabwe"

Banbury to be honest i'm only pulling Maidits leg. I knew he had a list of people but i found his post funny.

I do actually find him likeable and i wish him well here but i have no belief any DRC money is nearing and Andrew Bell seems to be in a fundraising frenzy lately. So that is not a good combination for this share price.

S̶p̶e̶c̶c̶y̶,̶ ̶I̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶h̶e̶r̶e̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶a̶n̶s̶w̶e̶r̶ ̶e̶v̶e̶r̶y̶o̶n̶e̶'̶s̶ ̶q̶u̶e̶s̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶ ̶I̶ ̶k̶n̶o̶w̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶a̶s̶s̶e̶t̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶o̶c̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶m̶o̶d̶e̶l̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶m̶u̶l̶t̶i̶-̶s̶t̶a̶g̶e̶ ̶C̶a̶p̶i̶t̶a̶l̶ ̶A̶l̶l̶o̶c̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶m̶o̶d̶e̶l̶l̶i̶n̶g̶

̶T̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶i̶s̶s̶u̶e̶.̶ ̶T̶h̶e̶ ̶i̶s̶s̶u̶e̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶u̶n̶t̶i̶l̶ ̶R̶R̶R̶ ̶h̶a̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶a̶w̶a̶r̶d̶ ̶p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶w̶o̶r̶k̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶i̶t̶s̶ ̶h̶a̶n̶d̶s̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶d̶o̶e̶s̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶m̶a̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶w̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶a̶n̶y̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶s̶a̶y̶s̶ ̶o̶r̶ ̶d̶o̶e̶s̶.̶ ̶I̶t̶ ̶m̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶w̶e̶ ̶h̶a̶v̶e̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶w̶o̶r̶k̶ ̶t̶o̶m̶o̶r̶r̶o̶w̶ ̶o̶r̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶,̶ ̶s̶a̶m̶e̶ ̶S̶a̶t̶u̶r̶d̶a̶y̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶S̶u̶n̶d̶a̶y̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶s̶o̶ ̶o̶n̶.̶ ̶T̶e̶d̶i̶o̶u̶s̶ ̶b̶u̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶i̶s̶.̶ ̶T̶h̶e̶ ̶i̶d̶e̶a̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶s̶o̶m̶e̶ ̶w̶a̶y̶ ̶A̶B̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶n̶e̶g̶l̶i̶g̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶r̶ ̶d̶e̶f̶i̶c̶i̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶j̶u̶s̶t̶ ̶n̶o̶n̶s̶e̶n̶s̶e̶.̶ ̶S̶a̶m̶e̶ ̶w̶i̶t̶h̶ ̶s̶o̶m̶e̶ ̶m̶a̶g̶i̶c̶ ̶d̶e̶a̶l̶ ̶o̶r̶ ̶m̶e̶e̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶o̶r̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶m̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶w̶o̶r̶d̶s̶ ̶e̶t̶c̶.̶

̶

̶N̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ ̶n̶i̶g̶h̶t̶.̶

Maidit i've just found your post from November where you highlight the names we should all look out for on this thread. I assume the person you think as turned is Specinvestor? He also could be an AI bot. 🤔

You said:

"Of 8 main players posting none stop today after that good news of shipping has began, who don't seems to own any stock anywhere on the stock Market be very careful

TD2

BBB

TALK

FLIGHT

AMADAN

RICHY

CAP K

DUKE

look out for them on other board, I think they could be AI BOTS trying to keep investors away from MICRO stocks that is about to turn, for there masters... while they gobble up 8 /5 and 10m worth in the background."

11 Dec 2023 Red Rock do a £110,000 placing.

14 Dec 2023 Red Rock do a £500,000 placing.

Then a long break for the Christmas holidays.

25 Jan 2024 when interviewer asks how Red Rock are funding wise the Red Rock chairman Andrew Bell responds: "We have a bit of money in our hands".

Somebody must have had a luxurious Christmas.

Is that it Andrew. A bit? 🥴

In voxmarket interview Bell talks about some projects. Then this exchange:

Interviewer: "And Funding wise how are you set for that?" 🤔🤔🤔

Bell: "We have a bit of money in our hands"🤬👺👿🤬

Helpful and the true reality is Bell is about 3 placings from wiping most RRR shareholders out. By that i mean they will need Red Rock to multibag many times to have any chance of breaking even.

Even those who bought in on the 15th June 2023 price spike (intraday it hit 0.28p), the direction this share price is heading they will soon need a ten bagger to break even.

Your subservient weakness is the reason dreadful chairman like Bell thrive on AIM. They know they can do huge discounted placings devastating a company share price and they will get useful idiots like you defending them. Pathetic!

You are shameless shocker Helpful. Red Rock is in a good place?

Correction out of the 1 billion he issued 100 million on the 11 Dec and 666 million on the 14 Dec 2023.

Also i may be wrong but i believe after the last GM they had authority to issue 1 billion additional shares, so far they've issued 666 million. So i wonder if he can only place those 334 million up to the AGM or can he still use them afterwards?

This is what Noirua says on the Àdvfn thread:

"People need to decide in their own minds whether the Arbitration payment is really due as said or whether it is just to get a favourable result on AGM voting on February 16."

..

Yes i agree with that. He's only resurfaced because he wants the AGM resolutions voted through so he can get his grubby fat mitts to use those 1.5 billion shares.