Member Info for zinky

Rach, I gather is an unknown party linked to a legal case against the company.

Hum, 80M arises out of Jay and the same old nonsense and disregard for shareholders investments. There was a golden opportunity to shed the ineptitude of JAY previous management failures and strike a new note. I state “HOLD” as the lack of integrity of the news flow is clearly shown in the current SP. ASHTON, who looks to a proxy for 80M, it may be time to clarify your position as it no longer washes.

It’s more the point “what they know”, which we do not. These parties are all on the inside track as they are investors connected to the consultants (bringing the myriad of new projects on board). Either there is a major “scam” in play or the assets being played are truly significant. Puzzling ..

Since I get I mention. As I see it now. 80M divestment of mineral assets was always RM’s agenda. Having the ability to “cash-in” those assets is a sensible move, so they can focus on “actual, factual deliverables”. MET1 have quality assets and need to press forward without 80M. If 80m credibility can be recovered (difficult at present), their assets are significant, however being poorly managed and arrogant is a question mark for investors, especially with a risk of litigation for fiduciary failings. There are better, more credible companies to invest in. A watch and wait … unless credible believable news arrives (just look at oil partner SP reaction).

There is a mix of shares and some that have not even been issued, 80M we’re free to sell “some” of the MET1 shares, however the “full” holding (read the small print). In any case 80M have cash and more shares on the way and MET1 do not have undue 80M influence on the board. Positive fir both companies IMO.

Sorry I also endorse this view and strongly suspect that the recent new investors via Zeus also feel the same (watch the mind blowing prestation, get the RM spin and then ....). Odd that MET1 has some shareholder confidence however 80M with its range of inspiring assets appears to have squandered its advantage. Solution ... Suspect it is a change of CEO to someone with credibility .. Better places to put new money until RNS news is actually proven to bae factual or fully endorsed by others.

Appears that the BoD have arranged another inside “rinse” then, rather than formulating a significant fully funded entity. Those who have direct contact need to request disclose on vested interest in this deal. Most companies who make such an announcement would rocket - response seems to indicate the sentiment. Such opportunity, pity about the deceptive approach.

Its just poor messaging from MET1 and a CEO who has now gone to ground (where before he was open and communicating). Its a sit and wait or dump and watch while others panic.

Not really ... the assets in Finland (acquired from 80M) are fully known to Mr Clayton and as such the RNS should be more indepth re directions and prospects. Good they are applying for EU strategic grant status. Currently on the edge of selling more stock as it appears "limbo" is in order for the next 3/4 months.Not really ... the assets in Finland (acquired from 80M) are fully known to Mr Clayton and as such the RNS should be more indepth re directions and prospects. Good they are applying for EU strategic grant status. Currently on the edge of selling more stock as it appears "limbo" is in order for the next 3/4 months.

If a US listing is being considered, some investors may wish to wait until this clarified. They could move off AIM and head to the US markets or they could dual list. In the meantime, it is sit and wait and mop up cheap shares. Dividend: well if they wish to grow up then this is now a must to bring in funds.

Where shall I start .... Assets (yes), BoD in it for themselves (yes), MET1 (well looks like partners in crime now - could and trust I am wrong), Confidence in company (well there is a question), Advice: invest elsewhere until someone "knocks on the door and asks "how much".

Yes in for a while and just took out stake (and Profit) before the "flippers" run, after they fail to get the WRAP allocations they wanted to flip again. As I said, my thoughts are along the lines that MET1 may end out being the "minerals" entity for 80M divestments (especially now 80M have a bigger stake). If SP performs this way buy MET1 and then just wait for 80M to rename itself again and perform 5 more fund raises before a US makes a bid for the licenses (or Trump takes Greenland by force and then what !!)

There are rumours that the funds raised by Metals One is connected to Rod (or there are chums) .... thereby a form of asset stripping to a venture at arms length ... All legal if the sale of SPV from 80M to MET1 is sigend off by various parties and the stories all add up. However if there are vested interests, they should be disclosed? Anyway the theory is the same 80M do not want minerals and if there is a "friendly" party who can fuirther them, why not.

The SP is currently 13p (old 1.3) and you can trade easy enough. Yes just banked 100% on some shares parked in a side account (cover off). What does strike me is a communication from years ago that stated Rod has NO interest whatsoever in minerals (his bag is hydrocarbons). The Finland Cooper was Clayton’s wet dream as he now has it back. Is there an active relationship in play to divest out “minerals” from 80M to others including “MET1” (now a vested interest), so what difference does the sale price make (it was to facilitate the deal).

When you look at Metals One, it looked ideal, spin out the "Black Schist" (next door to mega project) from Jay and launch a Euro based entity with access to accelerated EU grants for strategic clean projects. PEA delivers viable deposits but slight problem with cost benefit analysis (well at the moment but EU funding could change that) - so park and wait, however they are cash strapped. They enter in a dubious consultant arrangement (but hang on - who is lurking in the background - hum 80M). Alistair Clayton knows the 80M Finland assets well, as this was his baby (many years ago) and now it comes back to him via another spin out from 80M (OK - yes this does make sense - spin in out to a company who do have mineral experience), however part of the deal is closer ties with 80M (but hang on Metals One wanted to be at "arms length" from 80M due to XYZ). Hum - who is who and what is what. Is there a common puppet master behind all of this ???

The SPV was the darling of Mr Clayton (pre 80M / Jay) and its primary asset at the time, so it has just gone back home. Yes makes sense as 80M has more than enough assets that are sitting about doing very little.

For the ONDO shareholders acting in disguise. All well and good and creates a healthy debate. What I do understand from the recent interview (CEO, Chairman) that their research centre had tested various devices and the ONDO was not deemed suitable for their client base and a strategic relationship with Chubb has been established.

Rumours out and about that the spring budget may "adjust" the NI for low paid workers, following the significant reactions from the care sector, Greggs et al.

ONDO: Looking only as they could disrupt WATR in InsurTech. If they did, wait for the next SP downturn as they are running around counting gold bars. WATR recent announcement re Chubb is god as WATR operates above the client based that is bring targeted by ONDO. What ONDO has done is focused the CEO (or more a kick) that you need to use Tech ion an operational manner. To sum up: yes ONDO has legs but wait for the dizzy spell to pass by. WATR needs to get their act under way, rather than saying we can fix leaks.

Or there is some sort of deal going down to sell, merge the company, since it has a defined resource. Seems odd that price is being well supported and yet no news flow (except some must know and are using that information).