Member Info for Zebra04

Thanks for the link troajan.

Flagstaff??

What a start to day. Over a million buys in first minute. Can already see 14p on level 2.

"I have been advised not to comment further regarding the litigation"

Problem is you've already threatened him in public. That's not how you go about libel proceedings and his barrister can counter sue you.

As far as you lawyer obtaining jonnys identification,

LSE has his email, granted he used his genuine email address. They have no right to disclose that. There's nothing stopping jonny changing his linked email to a bogus one. Any other way to obtain his Identification will be challenged in court. You will need to disclose how that information was legally obtained.

For libel a barrister is required not a lawyer, it's a high court matter. I can recommend my one, she's based in Mayfair and served me and my colleagues well.

Better yet, save your money and move on. I don't know what Jonny said but nobody cares and the board has moved on.

Grh you still havent answered my question from when you started this attack on me.

You said I posted uninformed nonsense and the drilling team was in such high demand they couldn't wait a week.

What information do you have to back that up?

If you're going to call someone clueless then back it up.

I then said we were BOTH wrong in relation to funding in the past. That has clearly rattled you to go so far back into my posting history.

No one is right all the time, no one should expect to be either.

Grh

Bringing up my views on a geopolitical matter to discredit my view on placings is rather childish.

I'll be gentle too.

Grh I havent got the time to scroll through your 2k plus posts.

Androceles read it wrong so I didn't feel the need to correct him as it was clear.

I didn't say you said placing won't ever be required.

We were both wrong on how funding was going to be raised after we hit mudblock at mou2. You can go through your own posts at the time.

"so I will merely say that I was shocked by your personal position on several matters

not least of which:

regarding Mr Putin

regarding Ukraine

regarding the role of NATO

regarding the longevity of CEG"

Lol grow up.

So there's no confusion matt, I have nowhere near 8-10m shares. I wish. I own 1mil.

I think Tuesdays news alone could take us much higher, it was that good. A week or 2 later mou4 funding/spud date to add some fuel to the fire.

Same price 10.5p. They have thier discount and then news to make the sp run up. Other companies have pulled it off before when releasing good news.

Were digressing my point was to wait a week and raise at 20p. 9mil dilution vs 18mil.

My last comment on the matter.

Enjoy what we have here.

Matt my point is it was 24hours later and so paul was aware it was in the works. Thats not an ideal scenario mentioning it upcoming, better would be to release both rns the same time. That's granted there was an urgent reason it had to be so quick.

If he did the raise a week later then of course no need to mention it and let the sp run. My preffered method. Nothing stopping star valley moving to mou4 in the meantime.

Like I said yesterday, I've been diluted down from 1% to 0.22%. So it's my one irritation with prd.

Matt

50.5m net play news.

The placing was still a discount to Mondays sp.

To add,

As paul and lonny fell off thier chairs and knew they had to raise asap then they should've released the raise rns alongside mou3 update or mentioned they are in the process of securing funds.

Not let new buyers come in and then drop -15% the following day.

The results are great so the sp would obviously recover but regardless, I don't condone this type of behaviour. I also expect directors to do everything possible to reduce dilution. This doesn't mean don't raise and have nothing, it means time them.

Grh you've been wrong in regards to funding before and we've had a placing instead. I was wrong alongside you.

Paul has made haste regrettable decisions before. The cng interview comes to mind.

Anyways I don't want to detract from what is an exciting time for the company. I'm happy to be wrong, if it turns out there was an urgent reason we had to pay star valley right away and not next week.

(BTW...Forget about the total cobblers posted by Zebra re these drill guys and lady not being in high demand...

just uninformed nonsense...

The rig has been at guerciff since January when mou2 was suspended. Over 5 months incurring negligible costs.

Care to share what information you have that proves we couldn't wait a week before securing star valleys service for mou4. Or is it just a dream?

From the results of mou1/2/3 they know they have a long term partner in us.

Why sell when the overhang has cleared and mms want to take this higher.

My bad I took that wrong PT.

My conviction hasn't changed, here till end.

@keith Of course the latter. However my point was we could've got to the there with less dilution.

@Grh I look forward to hearing more.

@livininhope. I've supported this company a long time from 3.5p. Seen this board grow from sometimes zero posts a day.

@PT I don't think it's fair to call me a detractor. Those that have been here long enough will know I don't agree with timings of raises.

Thanks for all the replies guys.

I had 1% of the cake and now have 0.2% due to dilution.

I'm still bullish here, but i feel more could've been done to reduce the dilution on a few occasions.

Rob the drilling team hasn't been in high demand that's why it cost us close to nothing to keep them on site since mou2 pause.

I'm talking 1 to 2 week delay so we could've raised at a higher price and reduce dilution.

1 to 2 weeks is nothing.

It's cheap to drill mou4.

Even if the drill team left and we had to pay £500k extra to get them back. It would be insignificant If we raised at 20p.

@russo

Doesn't give Paul a pass.

Wednesdays raise rns killed the share price momentum here.

Paul should've waited before raising. We've had so many delays that there was no urgency to dilute us the day after a blockbuster rns. It's not the first time a raise has been done at an inappropriate time.

I'm miffed about dilution. Since I've been invested here the total shares has gone from 100mil to 450mil. My holding as a percentage of the company and therefore share of future profits has reduced over 85%.

Fun fact, the current share price is at 2019 prices. 450% dilution has meant that despite mcap growing significantly the share price is the same as 4 years ago.

Rant over.

Glad to see you back Caterham.

I wish you a speedy and full recovery.