Member Info for YorkshireLife

Rupert "might" be in on a secret plan to take Angus private together with Lucan, Tidswell & other city chums. This management have ripped off PI's so many times... ANYTHING is possible!

Come back and give us your wisdom when you've had more practice share dealing, Chuck...

The only rise here today is on the spread! Dirty ploy by the MM's to stir some interest that's all!

Icarus,

I can see a few day traders throwing pin money at this as it drops - for the reasons you state...

BUT:
For this to spike, it will need "great" news and a sudden BIG rush of carefree wealthy traders. I don't think there's anyone left - on this planet - who isn't wary of this BOD and their true motives.

The lower the SP drops... the greater the risk of losing everything here IMHO!

Willec,

Sent off an email just now... hope they're sitting down when they read it!

So back in late November 2018 the price was 1.58... today the price is the same!

According to The Market therefore: nothing much has happened... no added value... no new discoveries... NOTHING that adds value to the SP.

LOL - you really couldn't make this up!

YL :-)

Ocelot,

I've never been a cheerleader for any company - although I may have defended my buying decision and "reasonable" hopes for good outcomes from time to time - both here & elsewhere.

I always "try" to take a rational / balanced view but understandably I freely admit to getting rattled from time to time - especially when I come across half truths & fabrications being spouted on here.

I dislike shorters and swing traders talking down a share just so they can buy back in lower, just as much as I dislike rampers hoping to hoodwink a few newbies to invest - whilst they cash out themselves on a false spike... I view that kind of behavior as immoral!

Whilst I understand some current underwater investor's hostility towards negative posters here, there really is "no smoke without fire" and Angus only have themselves to blame for this. It comes as a direct consequence of their appalling mismanagement.

Regardless of looking in the rear-view mirror, and based upon their very latest FAILURE in their planning submission... it would appear that NOTHING HAS CHANGED or is ever likely to - so long as Lucan, Tidswell & chums are in the driving seat!

Here are four more predictions for you to fact check in a few months time:

1) Balcombe planning WILL be delayed and may not even be granted without further re-submissions / site work and written assurances.
2) Saltfleetby will cost more than anticipated, take longer to complete reconnection (if allowed) and - even then -turn out to be less commercially viable to operate.
3) The BOD will have further nasty surprises and manage to dig up yet more skeletons between now and then.
4) The SP has further to fall - long before it sees any realistic chance of sustainable recovery.

This is not negative spin to enable me to get a lower buy-in (I have already written off my investment here) this is me being realistic about the prospects of a serially incompetent management proving themselves capable of overturning their impressive record of 100% failure!

Wile.E. Coyote

It's there for all to see - simply scroll back through any poster's history - and in the case of Anguish Energy - I would suggest that the so-called Trolls have called it right every time! Predicting delay, disaster, dilution and double-dealing that has all come to pass.

The "Cheerleaders" here should hang their heads in shame - just like Angus management!

Yes,
Pretty much my experience too. Seems that these days unless you are prepared (and able) to "short"... then there is definitely no point in investing long term - as 99% of companies simply dilute your holding into oblivion. Even as a short term trader... you need to have inside info to avoid the pitfall of a good news spike being rapidly followed by warrant exercise - or placing - and the MM's pulling the rug out from under your feet before you can exit with your meager profit!

Most people I know, and speak to, view AIM companies as un-investable these days and companies like "Angus" are a prime example of just how dire and untrustworthy the AIM investment story is!

Anyone "still" prepared to invest here would undoubtedly have better luck on a roulette table! :-(

Ade,

You just need to contact your broker by email who will issue you with a voting form... same with HL and II and other brokers. Standard procedure.

I am also "hoping" we get a further offer - since surely it is not in any immediate competitor's best interests for this to be bought out on the cheap... even if they don't really want it for themselves?

TBH, we may have been in a far better position to negotiate a better deal had the BOD not downed tools and failed to complete on 99% of their drill program during this "supposedly" transformational year!

Truly pathetic - if the deal goes through as is IMHO

"it's gonna be epic one way or the other."

Sadly, the lesson I (and many others have learnt of late) is that it needs to be "EPIC" in Capitals draped in naked dancers... wrapped in ribbons & bows and covered in flickering fairy lights for the MM's and The Market to even notice it Paddy.

Otherwise it will be just more of the same old... same old... until some kind of buy-in / buy-out!

YL :-(

Icarus: "I’ve always had my suspicions on Ja51. Never had a good thing to say on ANGS ( "EVEN THOUGH PROVEN RIGHT)"?"

Just "slowly" read back your post Icarus and you will see that it makes NO sense whatsoever! Why have a beef with someone who was proven to be right all along?

If any of us (myself included) had taken his advice way back... we would all be in a lot healthier financial situation. If I have learnt anything on AIM it is this:

The "naysayers" usually have their feet on the ground and are usually proven to be more often RIGHT than wrong... whereas the ""cheerleaders" are virtually always proven to be blindly optimistic and invariably become invisible once the truth emerges!

YL ;-)

Ja51...

I seem to recall our "very own" Hollis mentioning in an interview a more conservative 300 barrels per day... but failing to clarify if this was the total figure from which Cudradrilla take the lion's share?

LOL ;-)

or should that be DOH?

YL ;-)

Yanis... and dough rises in the oven

LOL ;-)

Who has been proven right so far?

The "Naysayers" who have suggested the SP had further to drop, or the "Cheerleaders" who were convinced we were at the bottom at 1.10 and should trust in Lucan's promise of 4p on Saltfleetby alone?

We "all" have issues folks!

"IF" Angus actually delivered FOR ONCE it would be very difficult for any naysayers to be taken seriously here... the problem is, this BOD seem to go out of their way to fail and crash the SP repeatedly - which enables people to legitimately criticise them (regardless of their true motives).

I can't speak for Ja51, but - as a disgruntled "INVESTOR" - I can't find fault with anything he's said thus far!

Let's face it... after so many years in business already it's quite an achievement to have an 100% record of failure!!!!! (beyond the "normal" laws of probability - there again we do have Tidswell at the controls - so what should anyone expect?)

Yanis,

If Angus were operating the table... then "categorically" NO (they would have inevitably rigged it!)

Yanis,

Unfortunately... the mathematician in me says that "balance of probability" is based on past averages... and since Angus have a clean 100% record of failure... my guess is that this record will struggle to be broken?