Re: Morgan Stanley14 Apr 2023 15:32
I am wondering who used Morgan Stanley to hide their investment, so as not to give the game away.
MS do not invest in tiny companies on AIM market and then sell a few days later for a tiny profit.
Someone did not want, or was not ready to let the market know. MS was a useful vehicle.
Didn't Rio Tinto Diamonds employe the services of Morgan Stanley to oversee an IPO in London 10 years ago when they were considering a change in direction at the time, after failing to find a buyer.
Why hide? Would it be price sensitive and give the game away? Are they are just not ready to do so? I think thats likely here, but I could be wrong.
With the professor hinting of a world class discovery akin to Lomonosov deposit (2nd biggest in world), it doesn't take a genius to realise what major company is backstage, peeping around the curtain, waiting to start the show, especially given the previous confidentiality agreement. Argyle is closed, so they need another world class discovery to replace it. I wouldn't bet against eastern Finland becoming their replacement. There is nowhere else in the world, and Rio quietly returned to Finland a few years ago, and also formed Rio Tinto exploration Finland. ( Perhaps this was set in motion way further back, 10+ years ago, with the confidentiality agreement, who knows. One can only speculate)
As for Lahtojoki, one would think that would be on Burgundy Diamonds radar. Who knows whats in store here when the permit issues. I was amazed that Burgundy Diamonds shareholders never even considered Finland as a possible reason for their continued voluntary suspension. It appears they have not returned to trading yet, without explanation. What if Burgundy are after more than Ekati? Now there is a thought.