Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
Haven’t been on here for a while but reading the headlines today I thought I’d seek opinion on the whether the UKs declared upcoming ban on Russian origin metals (Cu, Al, Ni,…) will in anyway affect the EUA strategy. It looks like the UK is hoping other countries will follow suit and with the looming G7 I suspect pressure will be put on others.
I still have a small holding in EUA in what I would call my ‘high risk’ portfolio, so intrigued to read people’s thoughts.
Looked like a big fishing trip over the last hour with a drop to nearly 200 and then immediate bounce. This is quite an odd [over] reaction to those results which were OK from my perspective, especially going into retail season.
Rob Di Bank, why would we question this appointment? A NED with a status and CV like this does not join a company like EUA on a whim or as ‘front of house’ showroom material to boost a company’s ego. He’s here clearly to help execute strategy and in my view the true long term goal of EUA (or what it becomes) which is to embed itself as a key supply chain element for Hydrogen energy.
Fantastic to see a name like this join the team. We’ll done EUA.
Not sure why there’s some negativity and misery on this BB. This share is great long term hold and a sound weekly trade (and I’m no trading expert). Over the last 12 months I’ve consistently used around the top 20% of my holding here at EUA to buy and sell on a regular basis. Yes, it’s not the big fish we’re all waiting for but it adds a little excitement and the cycles do have a sort of rhythm to them. Even yesterday I sold nearly 20% at 25p and bought it all back in just now on the levels we see. There’s a risk the SP could have carried on through the roof and I’d have missed out on my tradable too slice, but history dictates this share usually slides back after a +ve RNS.
I’m sure plenty out there disagree, it’s healthy to disagree and challenge viewpoints. However, I see this business as a superb medium to long term hold. For me it’s not the metals for batteries (not much PGM required for them), it’s the next proper alternative fuel to fossil, Hydrogen.
My view is EV’s and large battery packs offer little in the way of overall environmental savings (but superb for inner city emissions). I see them as the Sony Minidisc stepping stone between magnetic tape and CDs. Industries are planning their material supply chains now for hydrogen energy, and PGMs are absolutely front and centre to that. So I’m in here, and will probably stay with a good portion following any transaction simply because what’s in the ground will be needed for many years to come.
Long and strong everyone!
J
Hi RIA82. Your trade will appear as a sell or buy depending on where the SP value is between the bid and ask. If your SP transaction is below the midpoint between bid and ask, it will be sell (red). If the SP is above the midpoint it will appear as a buy (blue).
The trade data you see has no idea whether you were buying or selling at the point of transaction, it’s uses a very broad assumption and is often wrong, like in your case.
There is no direct MM manipulation of how individual trades appear. However, they can artificially raise or lower the bid / ask in relation to SP to make more trades appear as sells or buys, irrespective of what they were.
When a guy like Ross says Hydrogen could be the future it makes me smile. The PGM EUA currently have locked away will be a considerable contributor to this energy, long term.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/57842205