On the brightside5 Dec 2018 10:57
V11 if fraud is a factor them most PLC companies should have insurance to cover the risk of such eventualities, but personally I think this is not the case and just a case of not using bad accounting practises, hence the in depth review ? in this case amendments to previous years accounts, and last years would I hope produce a set of accounts much more in keeping with the supply industry standard, and would go along way to minimize any accounting losses highlighted in the RNS that was released, and in my opinion far to inconclusive and vague to draw any solid conclusionMy research into this company, and the fact the directors have so much skin in the game would suggest this has a good prospect to come good and have invested here, but all being said the share will be around this level till RNS confirms the review results and makes the necessary accounting changes this will them determine the SP going forward the forensic review in addition to accounting review will be completed later imho and may not necessary be RNS but would be handy for institutional investors to bring them back onboard a very clever move and one I would of expected well worth the extra bit of coin? but like every other investment it carries risk but wish all investors GL and would love to here the outcome before christmas .