Member Info for WillIwontI

22 - you seriously want individual holders to email QBT separately to ask the same question you asked and claim to have a reply to when the respondent said you could forward to response with his name to everyone??
Why would you want to inundate QBT with emails whist whinging on and on about lack of progress?
And you wonder why no one believes you?
Personally I'm happy to wait but that's my choice and my risk, everyone to their own. Addi is probably right with his new approach but I'm trapped by FOMO lol.
GLA

I've had a look at recent news releases but can't see who has been allocated the 7.5m 5p options to be exercised by end of March 23?
Just think it might be relevant to what news may be received before then depending on their function within the company.
Also, if anyone can advise, what is the benefit of being awarded options at 5p that you could buy anytime on the open market at less than 5p now, is it just that there is no risk as they can wait until the sp is substantially above 5p before buying them for the guaranteed 5p and making an immediate profit?
Addison, I admire your nerve taking some shares out to chance on another company. I'm overwhelmed by fomo and too scared to move lol.
GLA

* vicious !!

Too many viscous personal insults from both sides on this bb for me. I'm looking for adult debate re QBT and finding the snide childish comments from the small minority who have taken over here tiresome so will look elsewhere from now.

Good luck to all genuine investors.

Does anyone else find the trolls highly entertaining and amusing?
I love the self importance and arrogant questioning as if they are attempting to be knowledgeable whilst they are actually so transparent and everyone can see straight through their inane questions and arguments :0

Weird, they're back after I posted??

What's happened to today's posts, they seem to have disappeared?

My hope is that this release is intended to be a catalyst to get get the sp moving up prior to the big RNS on Monday which will inject the nitro.
Here's to Monday Addison :)
Just a bit of fun guys, don't take it seriously! lol.
GLA all :)

Haha, that's a bit desperate fleecy!

Genuine question, will the agreement not need to be with the suppliers of the mining computers if we propose altering their software. I would assume the manufacturers have closed protocol and the software can't be touched without their agreement?

Welcome back Addison and welcome to the 'wish I hadn't done that' club, I think there's a lot of people here in that club, including myself!
My aim now is to hold for the longer term, possibly even up to 5yrs and to stop stressing over every movement.
GLA

Agree Magnum. FG is surely now in a position to publish a definitive business plan and strategy going forward. We can't wait forever aiming for perfection, let's use what we have to start a revenue stream and build on that going forward until the quantum side is achievable.
FG seems to change direction at a whim with knee jerk reactions to R&D progress.
Time for a proper plan of action and for it to be implemented within a proper time frame, not 'soon' or 'a few weeks/months' but a proper target date.
Let's see QBT run as a proper business now we're at this stage.

* Asic!

The patent application they talk about in the latest PRN is for a proprietary Asia chip, not software, I'm assuming therefore the software is covered by the existing patent application or only themselves will have access to it?

Good morning Tyke, whilst I understand your frustration, my view is that we've all decided to take a gamble investing on AIM and in doing so have to accept the way these companies work, they are not big companies with a preferred department and other support staff, they are often one man bands as in this case. Big rewards come with big risks etc. which we accept by investing in them.

GLA

Btc on the up, good RNS and SP goes down. I know traders are selling having gained their 10% at the RNS spike but still don't understand fall in SP.
I know we can ride this out and I'm not unduly concerned, but it baffles me. I don't think for a minute the MMs monitor and fiddle the SP, it's obviously done automatically but I'd love to understand the algorithms that are used.

Not sure why FG had to add that the monies could be difficult to realise in the RNS. If he had stuck to the award would the SP have stabilised a little higher?

We need to remain realistic here. SP will spike on any decent RNS but will be traded back down again immediately. Even a good RNS on the news we await will do the same, maybe to a lesser extent but I don't expect it to stabilise above circa 2.5p.
What will boost the SP permanently is the delivery of a sustainable strategic and operational plan following release of news that generates considerable revenue.
I believe this may still be a few months off yet but happy to wait.
All just my own opinion, everyone is of course entitled to their own.
GLA

Why?

Why?