Member Info for WillIwontI

What's the relevance of Sunrise Tech Group mentioned in the application?

Does anyone think the repeated testing statements might be a ruse and that FG is more likely finalising talks with partners etc. but can't say as much yet due to confidentiality agreements?

Just a thought and a different angle of discussion.

Interesting Addi,

If Quantum could bypass SHA I repeat my thoughts that FG needs to maximise income before then and not wait for suitable quantum computers for his algorithm. I would be more than happy if FG raised funds to mine with their software at the expense of others by dilution if the resulting SP was still a final 50p or so.

*Jambone!!

Jawbone, thanks for your reply, I've been invested in QBT/CLP for some time and have read and watched all the info out there, I was just trying to say nothing is cast in stone regardless of what has been said/reported previously, things change for good reason and it was just my thoughts on an alternative approach, that's all.
Have a good day.

Addi, I actually love your posts, they're entertaining and do little harm however, you can't speak on behalf of QBT, you can only give what is your own opinion, nobody except FG and his associates know what the ultimate plan might be and even they will change tack depending on results, market, competition etc.

Keep up the entertainment Addi, I wish you well and hope you achieve your goals, you seem one of the few honest regular posters on here.

Sorry, that should be Fleccy, spell correct changed it.

Fleecy

' If all the big miners used software that improved efficiency by 30%, going forward, mining difficulty would increase to maintain a rate of 10minutes per block processing rate'

If that was the case, would it not be better for QBT to keep their software to themselves and mine coin themselves? If the software worked they would end up potentially being the sole successful miners of coin with massive revenue?

I'm not as wise as many on this board and ask the question honestly for comment and discussion.

GLA

The figures are all percentages ie QBT Share price change between 18 March 2020 and 3 Sep 2021 (%) is 1200%

Sorry for the format, the below is an extract from an ii report, just thought it w
As interesting and I would share, no opinions, just a factual statement and a bit of a puzzle for you to decipher the messed up format:

10 best performers on AIM since the Covid crash low
Company

Share price change since 18 March 2020 (%)

Share price change between 18 March 2020 and 3 Sep 2021 (%)

Share price change since 3 Sep 2021 (%)

Premier African Minerals Ltd

PREM
5.85%

1,310

275

276

Quantum Blockchain Technologies

QBT
1.27%

1,200

883

32

Kodal Minerals

KOD
1.29%

1,100

931

16

Itaconix

ITX
0.87%

1,050

1,380

-22

Chariot Ltd

CHAR
3.95%

807

351

101

CyanConnode Holdings

CYAN
1.07%

745

567

27

Avacta Group

AVCT
4.76%

704

875

-18

Zephyr Energy

ZPHR
1.08%

638

831

-21

XP Factory

XPF
0.26%

627

1,140

-41

Sareum Holdings

SAR
2.60%

600

2,700

-75

Source: SharePad. Prices as at 23 March 2023.

I don't believe they intended it to be RNS news worthy but we're advised otherwise when they posted it?

The only explanation I have is Suthy is FG, it all fits lol

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2023/03/06/nuclear-lab-north-test-quantum-computer-runs-270-degrees-celsius/

HSBC removed QBT from its buy portfolio many months back although they let you keep what you already had. I'm in the process of transferring my s&s isa to ii to enable me to buy and sell again.

Good for BTC, unfortunately I'm invested in QBT.

How I'd love there to be a 'ffs' as well as the 'recommend' option to click on!

It's Sunday, should you all not be at Sunday school or something!!

Thanks notready, I'll take a look at them.

Off topic, if there is a topic at the moment, I need to pick a new provider as I'm with HSBC and they decided some time ago to take QBT off their platform because of its link to crypto currencies.
My portfolio is currently held in a s&s isa and I'm thinking of transferring it to Interactive Investor (ii), could I ask if anyone has any views or advice on providers please?
Many Thanks

Fair enough 22, still don't understand why you wouldn't share the actual response with fellow investors though, just makes everyone suspicious.