Member Info for Wilco_Roger

Ricardo,

The Russinas are using a fraction of theor power to date, the ground loss have never been quicker, I very much doubt Ukraine can last another 12 months let alone year IMO.

Let's see, its very very sad for everyone concerned

Del, you are correct but what they aren't paid to do is spend their time pandering to your every need.

What a silly thing to say regarding my research, better still why don't you leave Shiv alone and try using that time to research for the greater good of yourself and the other genuine shareholders.

4 hours, not fussed, it might be here, might not, Im pretty sure it will but equally not going to panic and email Shiv to find out why.

Del,

Are you seriously justifying your neediness by stating that someone posting their research is worse than continuously emailing the PR department?

Take a chill pill.

Del,

Probably because he is sick of you pestering him every 5 mins. Stop being so needy, the company will release the results as soon as they can, CS stated expected today, they should be here but if delayed it will very likely be a couple of days, at most the end of this week IMO. What do you expect Shiv to say, "Hey Del, long time no hear, the results will be released on Tuesday at 11.58am".

FFS tiffin, why are you bothering to reply???

Definition of insanity, claiming someone is essentially stupid but trying to continue a conversation on an anonymous BB 😣

Do you not think these were bought and forward sold? Thats the impression I got.

CS stated that it was investors that HAD to sell when the war started and that they asked EUA to dual listing in order to enable them to reinvest. Western companies would likely have sold to meet thier moral obligations, that would have been a choice. For me it will be t a Russian buyer that has made this request to the BOD, they would have literally HAD to sell.

Why are people replying to the known idiots? Makes me question the intelligence of many here.

Any decent thread is ruined...

Annual Report to be published today, I am expecting it after hours.

Maybe some further info regarding the commencement of trading on the Kaz exchange. Quite possibly the prospectus will be published with/shortly after the AR with trading 5 days after?????

GLG2,

How about stop replying to the idiots? They want the threads clogged up with shiz.

I've spent loads of time researching yesterday and today on and off to display it here for people to muddy it with shiz.

They aren't worth you time

Icarus,

I hadn't thought about it in that way, essentially nothing has changed from when they sold (if anything its gotten better asset wise) so they may not only buy back what they had but more, could be 7,8,9,10x 😳

Cebo,

This is what my notes say, I cannot recall exactly where I found it...

If EUA has said "all compliance is complete," then:

The offer/admission document is either approved or about to be published.

Once published, AIX can schedule the listing within 3–5 business days.

I've only used "official sources" so likely AIX website or similar.

Two more green suckers, getting desperate. I said it a couple of weeks ago, when you see an influx of the known simpletons theres news.

Keep em coming Wolfie, SpikeyJ et al as you are a lucky charm to the EUA board.

Green box brigade arrive again, Wolfie, here's a little hint for your tiny brain...you are talking to yourself as you are green binned you silly sausage.

You are irrelevant to everyone so please get a life (or another girlfriend) or go on another fake golf trip 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

There may be a short delay between publication of the AR and trading on AIX. CS stated that a prospectus or such like had to be submitted first, he stated that it gets published on the LSE and AIX at the same time.

From what I can gather, once the AR is published the prospectus is then published, the prospectus is then looked at for up to a couple of weeks then AIX becomes live.

Not sure if this has to be done in this specific order or whether it has already been done hence the comment in the RNS regarding "all compliance issues are complete" 🤔

Thoughts...??

Interesting to know which stragetic investors HAD to sell when the war in Ukraine began as stated by CS.

I doubt it was China, I would say ot was most likely to be the US and/or Russia, the US due to "moral" reasons and Russia as they could see sanctions coming/assets being frozen.

I truly beleive that buying from the above would seriously see some increases to the SP. I mentioned last week that we only need a couple of 20-30% roses plus 8-10 10% rises to get us back to pre war levels, with the new liquidity I beleive that this is entirely possible, and quite possibly sooner than many would imagine.

We have seen first hand how fast this share can rise on little buying, if the big institutional investors decide to buy it could take the rises we've seen to another level.

Cebo-456,

Good point, I am not entirely sure how it works but from research this is how I understand it. Shares are bought by the Kaz exchange by a market maker, from a custodian (institution which holds the actual shares, such a citi or HSBC) and are sold to the Kaz exchange via a system such as CREST (uk end), the custodian then cancels the UK shares and issues the exact amount of shares onto the Kaz exchange. The job of the custodian is to ensure there are no "fake share creation" etc.

Essentially, the way I see it is that the number of shares on the London exchange will potentially decrease by whatever number they increase on the Kaz exchange. I don't see this increasing nor decreasing the SP itself but, where the company has now opened itself up to enable "other buyers" who previously held but HAD to sell when the war started (as stated by CS) will enable said buyer to purchase again, thus, in theory lifting the share price back up to somewhere near pre war levels. As we have, by the looks of it increasd our assets and their quality (Osmium for example), this may have created the perfect storm and buying could be greater than pre war.

Exciting times, I don't see an immediate (huge) increase in the SP but a steady rise for sure.

ALL IMO, DYOR.

Last post: Punter1234, Today 21:30

Someone ask Punter to get it in his pea brain that he is talking to himself, someone please save him from thrown his toys around 😂

Stretch,

You can't come on here pretending to be the all holy saint, you come on here every evening without fail, throw childish abuse around then leave.

Grow a set a act like tge 70 year old you claim to be man FFS, wet wipe.

This is what I have managed to calculate, sitting out in the sunshine, I need to double check and dig into them a little further but this is the gist of it. Any (SENSIBLE) discussion/opinion on this would be great, its certainly one piece of a very exciting time regarding EUA and our investments.

Eurasia hasn’t published explicit osmium reserves, but they reported ~2% osmium content in PGM concentrate at West Kytlim. We can extrapolate cautiously from that.

Known figures:

Eurasia's West Kytlim mine has historically produced ~200–300 kg of PGM concentrate per season.

The company has reported multiple millions of ounces of PGM resources across its assets (mainly platinum, palladium, rhodium).

If osmium is present at ~2% of PGMs across a meaningful portion of the West Kytlim or Monchetundra resource base, the potential osmium in the ground could be significant.

Let’s estimate osmium as 2% of 10 million oz PGM Eq. (rounded resource for all assets):

1 oz = 31.1035 g, so 10 million oz = 311,035,000 grams

2% of that = 6.22 million grams = 6,220 kg = 6.22 tonnes of osmium

Osmium isn’t traded on open exchanges like gold or platinum, but...

Retail crystal osmium (osmium tetroxide is toxic, so it's sold as inert metal) = ~$1,500–$2,000 per gram

Bulk raw osmium for industrial use is much lower, likely $400–$700 per gram, depending on purity and market

Using a conservative bulk value of $500/gram:

6.22 million grams × $500 = $3.11 billion USD

A common discount factor is 10%–15% of gross value to reflect feasibility, costs, recovery, and risk.

10% of $3.11B = $311 million USD

15% of $3.11B = $466 million USD

If the Osmium equates to only 2% of the im ground amounts the extra value is insane.

Could CS have pulled an absolute blinder, did he already have a good idea as to what was there. Time will tell, looking forward to the Annual Report as CS has specifically stated that his goal is to market the company, surely tge AR is a great place to start???