Member Info for Wiggly

Sky is the limit. Could be far higher than £5.

Those that bought under 98-105 are taking some profit. Once clear I think we will re-rate.

Possibility to be back in the 200s today

All, please take the time to listen to the Webinar. Prior to last night there was big question mark regarding whether the LFT could be a success. My own belief was that anything over 80% (e.g. better than the nearest competition) would have been good enough to generate transformational revenues. Post last night, I really do believe they are on track for >99% accuracy and would urge all to listen and make their own minds up.

Why would Klaus states that 95% accuracy would not be good enough for Mass screening but state later that 99% would be doable.

It seems probable that they have reached 99% specificity and sensitivity, meaning absolute best in class.

If, as they all predicted, 100s of millions of tests per month would be required, AVCT, with a best in class test, would have a majority market share

Quite honestly that is unbelievable. I don't want to ramp this too much but any pervious predictions on share price performance should be ripped up as whatever your were targeting should now be x at least 10 fold.

This explains buying in at 120 when they had opportunities at 18p.

Quite sure they will have looked closely at this latest news pre placing and decided 120 was a price worth paying.

ALL EYES are now firmly on AVCT.

Act as a POTENT Inhibitor of the CV - I assume they will do likewise with many other viruses?

Alwayswinng - sorry you sold out.

They clearly needed to have third party validation of what they did discovered in-house.

They now have a third party backing their science - HUGE

Professor David Bhellas words, not mine.

The Affirmers act as POTENT Inhibitors of the SAR-COV2 virus into human cells.

POTENT!

All - this is absolutely huge news!

All, please take the time to listen to the Webinar. Prior to last night there was big question mark regarding whether the LFT could be a success. My own belief was that anything over 80% (e.g. better than the nearest competition) would have been good enough to generate transformational revenues. Post last night, I really do believe they are on track for >99% accuracy and would urge all to listen and make their own minds up.

Why would Klaus states that 95% accuracy would not be good enough for Mass screening but state later that 99% would be doable.

It seems probable that they have reached 99% specificity and sensitivity, meaning absolute best in class.

If, as they all predicted, 100s of millions of tests per month would be required, AVCT, with a best in class test, would have a majority market share

Quite honestly that is unbelievable. I don't want to ramp this too much but any pervious predictions on share price performance should be ripped up as whatever your were targeting should now be x at least 10 fold.

Klaus said that 95% accuracy would not be possible for mass screening, they would need 99%+.

He then closes the session by saying 99%+ is doable.

Anyone have any predictions on where a 99+% sensitivity and specicifity LFT test takes the share price?

Could deliver several billion $s of profit during h2.

Definitely should not have gone ahead.

Lucky for us they gave the game away. They may need to rns tomorrow

Rusty, I also sensed the Sona LFT was struggling.

It seems probable that they have reached 99% specicifity and sensitivity, meaning absolute best in class.

Huge huge news!

100s of millions of tests per month and very likely avct will have a majority market share

UNBELIEVABLE

Sirius, klaus actually said 95% would not be good enough. He said they would need 99% for mass screening and that it was doable!!

Wow! I have a feeling this will fly tomo.

They have basically disclosed it works and it works at 99+% eg best in class

I urge all to listen carefully to what Klaus says I believe he has given the game away.

He says 95% sensitivity and specificity would not be good enough for mass population screening and that 99%+ would be required.

He then states during the Q&A that it is doable, at which time David jumps in to say its more than doable!!

If this is correct and avct deliver 99%+ sensitivity and specificity it is INCREDIBLE NEWS!

consider sir Al discussed importance of best in class.

He then says during the

Even Kluas said it was going to be doable!!

And this from the man who said 95% specicifity would not be good enough, we would need 99.

It looks like avct will deliver best in class!!!

Exactly - which makes this look like a marketing event aimed to market their expertise