Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Just bought 50K+ shares but they are showing as a SELL - anyone experienced this before?
Versarien confirmed as the supplier of graphene
Versarien provided the graphene for the recent concrete enhancement
https://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/greener-and-cheaper-graphenemanchester-solves-concretes-big-problem/
Funny I didn't do any research it was just an idea came into my head.
Would anyone know if graphene is none-stick?
Is Concretene the answer to the millions of potholes in the UK
https://www.***************************/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Nanoco-Group-Sensing-programme-moves-to-next-phase.pdf
So many start-up companies in the US - here's one https://www.aeva.ai/press/aeva-investor-webcast/?target=video
Re Apple: as reported on patentlyapple.com
Apple places emphasis on the iPhone's camera and display each and every year. At one point in time Apple may shift to Quantum Dot OLED to take Apple's displays to yet another dimension. and in a new patent application published this morning, we're able to see that Apple is once again pushing their Quantum Dot – OLED technology further.
The timing is interesting considering that Samsung just announced that they'll be investing US$11 Billion shifting from Quantum Dot-LCD to Quantum Dot-OLED with mass production aimed for 2022. Apple's vision for future displays seems to be on track with the best minds in the industry.
first reported on Apple's work on Quantum Dot displays back in 2014 in a report titled "Quantum Dots Could Take the Retina Display to the Next Level." It was filed in 2012 or seven years ago. Since that time we posted several other reports on Apple's work on Quantum Dot display (01, 02, 03) including two patents being granted patents in 2019 (01 & 02).
Today the US Patent & Trademark Office published a patent application from Apple titled "Quantum Dot based Pixel Assembly."
I’ve held shares in Nano for 8 years. Trying to sell and rebuy in a rollercoaster of a ride. I’m in profit but holding on now, for the same reason I bought in the first place - fantastic British technology. Post Brexit we will be relying on companies like this to create wealth and pay off our debts.
Apple and Displays of the future
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Apple-partners-with-TSMC-to-develop-ultra-advanced-displays
look at around 4 minutes
look at around 4 minites
Could this be the good news we are waiting for?
https://appleinsider.com/articles/21/01/04/apple-may-expand-rear-lidar-sensor-use-to-all-iphone-13-models#P1G%3E
News today
https://www.whathifi.com/news/lg-qned-tvs-bring-mini-led-to-the-lg-2021-line-up
Most scientists are very familiar with the grants system in the UK. Without it, much of the research would just not progress. I see nothing unusual in the grant from Innovation UK. What is unusual is that this news made the LSE news bulletin, suggesting that that Nanoco’s marketing communication is improving.
Having spent over 30 years as a marketing director in the electronics/ computer industry. I can tell you very few people really understood the role of marketing - that is....”the management process of identifying, anticipating and satisfying customer needs profitably”. I worked for a Japanese company for 3 years their marketing department was massive but they knew everything about their target markets, their competitors, pricing, manufacturing proccesses, route to market, distribution, packaging, promotion and “marketing communication” (what the majority think of as marketing). Part of marketing is understanding consumer /customer behaviour. Clearly, Nanoco don’t understanding of the marketing process and that’s why they don’t have a marketing department.
Retailers of Samsung TVs have also made massive profits out of Nanoco’s IP - Where is is the consumer law to penalise them? If the evidence is there for us to make a judgement, it's also there for retailers.
Is this LGs answer to Samsung QLED?
https://www.lg.com/uk/nanocell-tvs
Perhaps this is why they funded Nanoco
http://shorturl.at/tEHMR
This would never happen if retailers were truly responsible for the goods they sold. It would be just one step from the illegal selling counterfeit goods. I guess law makers just haven’t got round to it yet.