Member Info for Whojamaflip

Harry G,
Whilst I read the blog with much interest unfortunately I am a 'perfectionist' when it comes to engineering matters and the reference to 'resistivity' is a tad reversed for me.

Resistivity is the parameter by which resistance to flow in a material is measured as against conductivity (which is the reverse but essentially the same measurement)

so in purist terms it is mho's (for conductance) v ohms (for resistance)

wjmflp

By not getting it quite right I am able to give a little bit of lattitude in the hope the writer knows more about geology and the petro/oil discipline than report writing.

wjmflp

smiffy,
Anyone who was in RMP over the years 'may'/would not trust anything Bad bandy says or does in my opinion

wjmflp

And I am still invested/holding jiddy

Just for future reference

wjmflp

Ta garry

so not a complete nono ....yet

Here's hoping

See I can have a little bit of optimism (all that's left)

wjmflp

Desires oil to water fiasco.
Karma says this is water to oil (at some time please)

wjmflp

Ta JH
Lets pray for good seals

wjmflp

Although I understand porosity has a lot to do with it as well

Lots being said regarding depth and issue of RNS.

If they hit water at the top of the Nanushuk range, is it UNLIKELY that they will hit oil in the lower half of the Nanuchuk range as oil would have sat on top of water.

Just a viewpoint and potentially why they issued the type of wording so early.

Cheers

wjmflp

That water find is probably what DW left in IW2 and DW wanted it back

Just a humorous take before anyone starts shouting

wjmflp

DW collecting his salary still, bonus still in place and everyone else hurt - so far.
The wording of the RNS implies hope still, just to keep us hanging on.

I knew I should have baled out when we got involved with RMP, my earlier experience with them told me so but I believed.

Belief costs.

No point selling but shite stinks

wjmflp

By the way, next time I get shouted down by drum bangers I will bale out - would have saved me the trouble of having to wait for eternity for the last shout saloon

Keep taking the money and let me know when the next RI or cash raise is please

Just my saddened opinion

Either this drill ship is as tight as a ducks arris (which is really special) or ....something late on through Seabea.?

My opinion/hope is that there was something as we passed through the amplitudes of Seabea and early on with the Nanuchuck which required looking at more closely.

That is what I hope for

wjmflp

Nigoil,
I am calm (that type of personality)
and having been in this share for some years now, patient.

My post was merely an observation on the rig operatives and how 'well run' it seems.

Now that's a positive isn't it?

wjmflp and out for the day at least
had enough of the posters who only like one viewpoint
their own

Oh and the result of the outcome posted on this BB but not confidential information of either parties

So only 2 days drilling and that based on guessing the time of the re-start.
What do you think the Sebea band depths are ? and how many drilling days to cross

Grasping at straws at my observation on the tightness of the drill

Nigoil,
I do not see it as negativity.
Indeed, if you check my early posts and as I have said before, I was uber positive all the way up to IW2 shut in.

Having been 'done' before on a few of my other investments XEL, FOGL, RMP all of those BB's had drum beaters and opposition bashers and I got a bit more conservative about drummers.
I remember the famous oilriches on RMP who bashed a big drum and then told the BB that he had sold earlier! (probably wanted the sp to stay high while unloading but just my opinion).
So if anyone wants to question my stance, nothing would delight me more than to get out at a profit and for a complete success of this drill.

I have worries that's all

My greatest worry is another shut in for an incomplete drill which I consider worse than a dry hole as we are left in hibernation for another 9 months. That would not be good for anyone to NOT know.

As for someone saying I am not invested - poor thing. They have no idea but if they really want to put it to the test, I am happy to prove to an independent party what I hold and when I bought if that party deposits a sum of money equivalent to the value of my shareholdings at todays sp with the independent party. If I am truthful I keep their deposited money and if not I pay an equivalent sum to them at todays sp.

I am happy to do so

wjmflp

Jiddy,
Seems you cannot take or like facts

Keep beating that empty drum

See your own post at 08:13

'........Drilling of interval containing primary Nanushuk targets (@~4,500') commenced 25th February (AK time): current depth ~2,640'....'

So even by your own statements 3 days into the interval containing the Nanushuk targets and we have ? what

I will say it again - nada from the rig (so tighter than a ducks arris OR nothing to report.

You are the same as others on here who do not like an alternative view

says it all and I am invested before you put out that other drivel statement

wjmflp

Unless I am mistaken, the drill timeline shows 4500 MTD some way below the Seabea target depth
and again looking at the Winx days pdf, the Seabea Turbidites as a band and are shown way above Nanushuk MDT.
They will have been going through the Seabea Turbidites for some period to get to Nanushuk MDT.

So as I said:

either this drill is tighter than a ducks arris in water or the journey has been unremakable

Geo's?

wjmflp

Tighter than a ducks arris in water or the journey through Seabea was disappointing.
Hopefully a geo might interpret the cross section amplitudes to explain better.

Hoping for better news once into Nanushuck & Torok

wjmflp

And the prize for DW making such a mess of IW2

Salary
Incentives
Salary
Incentives
More funds to play with?

Just my opinion

I may not like smiffys grammar but I suspect he is a lot more aligned with his thoughts

wjmflp

Brom, stop apologising for DW