We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
You have my faith that you'll take the throne, Ghia. Haha, good luck!
Seems like it censored the URL. But just replace the *s with "pumped or dumped . com", without spaces of course.
We all made the list of rampers: http://******************/rampchecker/rampcheckbytidm.php?search=SNG&s=09
Saw this floating around on twitter. I mean, this just looks like a list of all the people who have ever posted here...
Good find, thanks TipTop
Much appreciated, Seaboy.
Thanks hanoihank. I'm not sure why people are honing on that one small part of the quote, because if you quote RM's whole sentence, he goes on to say: "You don't need much of an effect when the world is broken and straining, and hospitals are filled up with patients, any effect you can have in the home environment is priceless.
The goal is keeping patients out of hospital, when the signal is low, even a small effect would achieve this. Therefore the panicking is senseless.
I understand that people are starving for new information, and only have a month old interview to go on, but it's no excuse to reveal how little certain people understand IFN.
I agree. Certain people are taking a single quote and running with it, despite it being RM's own speculation about the way their drug works in COPD/Asthma patients. It shows an astounding lack of research on IFN if anyone was surprised by a lower signal inducing a lower response, and I'd advise those who are uncertain to do some reading. The goal here is to keep people out of hospital, regardless of the signal - that's why you don't need a massive response because you don't need a tank to take out an ant.
What you said about the other measurements on the trial, including breathlessness, is important. The people worrying and pasting the same quote over and over haven't even talked about this, which is why we're seeing a river of tears.
Great post, thanks Matml
I posted this in the other thread but I'll post it here since, ironically, there's a fire to put out here.
RM says "It might be so for COVID in the home setting, the patients aren’t poorly enough to generate a big signal. Nevertheless you don’t need much of an effect when the world is broken and straining and hospitals are filled up with patients, any effect you can have in the home environment is priceless".
This was recorded a month ago, and he said it *might* be so for COVID in the home setting, extrapolating from what he's seen from the drug in COPD/Asthma patients. This answer was simply in reply to Max Herrmann, who said that it would be interesting if the early treatment data was even better than the later treatment data; it would not make sense for RM to leave that comment from Max as is without addressing it. If I was to give my thoughts on what the results would be like from what I've seen the drug do in the past for other illnesses, I'd say this too.
Can't change the IFN mechanism, and the patients who'd need SNG001 would respond well to the treatment, given the larger signal. The patients who don't need it would be fine regardless. It keeps patients out of hospital.
I understand why you'd want to hop on a negativity bandwagon to buy a lower price, but that time has passed - everyone held through the vacuum and negative posts, and we'll continue to hold until take-off which of course, will be soon.
I agree. I don't interpret this negatively at all. Adding to that as well, RM says "It might be so for COVID in the home setting, the patients aren’t poorly enough to generate a big signal. Nevertheless you don’t need much of an effect when the world is broken and straining and hospitals are filled up with patients, any effect you can have in the home environment is priceless".
It was recorded a month ago, and he said it *might* so for COVID in the home setting, extrapolating from what he's seen from the drug in COPD/Asthma patients. This answer was simply in reply to Max Herrmann, who said that it would be interesting if the early treatment data was even better than the later treatment data; it would not make sense for RM to leave that comment from Max as is without addressing it. If I was to give my thoughts on what the results would be like from what I've seen the drug do in the past for other illnesses, I'd say this too.
Can't change the IFN mechanism, and the patients who'd need SNG001 would respond well to the treatment, given the larger signal. The patients who don't need it would be fine regardless.
Not long now!
You don't scale up manufacturing before approval unless you know you're sitting on a solid product and confident of it. We're so close.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6UUKBD62gk - The link if anyone needs it.
Do you have a link to it Matterhorn?
The SP is only 160 because of the extended news vacuum which is fine. If people were suddenly aware of the goldmine that we were sitting on with news/results imminent, the SP would be much higher - we'll see this happen very quickly post-news. You generally need to light a very obvious fire under people to make them buy in, and that'll happen shortly.
It's insane that it's 160, given where I think this is going very soon.
No problem Lurker, the paywalls are terrible when information should be free to access, especially news.
Foobar - NoScript is a great alternative.
Great post. I think this will be important to refer back to when our restrictions are lifted soon, since I fully expect the cases to rapidly climb. This increase in cases, even subtracting the new variant factors, would always be the case even with a hypothetical current vaccinated population with both jabs; but since these restrictions are going to be eased with a partially vaccinated population with only one of those jabs, vaccinations that don't even account for all variants alone aren't going to end this. As discussed before, a partially vaccinated population has other implications with new variants etc, which I'm sure we'll hear more about soon.
Quick tip for anyone coming across news they want to read behind a paywall like we saw on the Telegraph today:
You can bypass these paywalls by using https://archive.fo/ - enter the URL and it'll spit you back the full page. For example, if I enter the Telegraph article URL from today in there, I get this URL which is the full article https://archive.fo/OlsVh
Enjoy!
Ghia and Meelie - Thank you for clearing that up!
Good Luck All.
Can I ask how making a quick trade in April can minimise CGT? (from Ghia's earlier post). I've recently invested in SNG via S&S ISA but I'm new to trading. I'd appreciate any help with this as I am maxed out and thinking about topping up, thank you everyone!
Granted, but other companies are discussed here outside of this scope also so I'm curious as to whether anyone here is invested - they're a bio company still.