RE: News incoming18 Jun 2020 12:21
It just seems to be the way of things, that there’s a couple of these idiots on each share/bb unfortunately.
Their rationale/narrative seems always to be the same i.e. “providing balance” versus the so called “rampers” and therefore their negativity is legitimate and has a place. What they don't seem to understand is that negativity for the ‘sake of balance’ isn’t research (It’s just bashing) and does nothing other than discourage new investors and harm their own “alleged” investment.
So called “Rampers”, on the other hand, usually only offer research and fact (with the very odd exception) and have an absolute right to do so as they have a vested interest in the share price increasing. Real “balance” for someone looking to offer a counter/negative argument, would be to pick holes in that research and offer an alternative take or view, with reason. I’m not seeing any of that from ATrades, Chablard or Goup. For the record guys, slating the BoD and CEO does NOT constitute “research” I’m afraid, that’s just whinging!
I’m just not sure some people truly understand what “balanced research” really is.